/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.38 Aspirin prevents blood from clot... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Aspirin prevents blood from clotting and so helps prevent strokes. The Second European Stroke Prevention Study asked whether adding another anticlotting drug named dipyridamole would be more effective for patients who had already had a stroke. Here are the data on strokes during the two years of the study:

(a) Summarize these data in a two-way table.

(b) Make a graph to compare the rates of strokes for the four treatments. Describe what you see.

(c) Explain in words what the null hypothesis H0: p1 = p2 = p3 = p4 says about the incidence of strokes.

(d) Find the expected counts if H0 is true, and display them in a two-way table similar to the table of observed counts

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.

b.

(c) The null hypothesis states that the proportion of successes for each treatment is the same, based on the participants' smoking behaviours.

(d) The expected counts are the total of the rows multiplied by the total of the columns, divided by the sample size

Step by step solution

01

Part (a)Step 1: Given information

Given in the question that, Aspirin prevents blood from clotting and so helps prevent strokes. The Second European Stroke Prevention Study asked whether adding another anticlotting drug named dipyridamole would be more effective for patients who had already had a stroke. Here are the data on strokes during the two years of the study:

We need to summarize these data in a two-way table .

02

Part(a) Step 2: Explanation

Aspirin reduces blood coagulation and hence helps to avoid strokes, according to the question. As a result, the question includes statistics on strokes during the two-year research. Thus, in a two-way table, the number of no strokes equals the number of patients minus the number of strokes, that is,


StrokeNo stroke
Placebo250
1399
1649
Aspirin206
1443
1649
Dipyridamole211
1443
1654
Both157
1493
1650

824
5778
6602
03

Part(b) Step 1: Given information

Given in the question that, a table which contains data on strokes during the two years of the study:

We need to make a graph to compare the rates of strokes for the four treatments.

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

Aspirin reduces blood coagulation and hence helps to avoid strokes, according to the question. As a result, the question includes statistics on strokes during the two-year research. Thus, in a two-way table, the number of no strokes equals the number of patients minus the number of strokes, that is,

As a result, the proportion in each category is computed by dividing the number of strokes/no strokes by the row total given in the last column:


StrokeNo Stroke
Placebo0.1516
0.8484
Aspirin0.1249
0.8751
Dypyridamole0.1276
0.8724
Both0.0952
0.9048

As a result, the following graph can be used to compare the success rates of the four treatments:

Thus, by looking at the histogram we note that the proportions of strokes/no strokes do not seems to vary much by group.

05

Part(c) Step 1: Given information

Given in the question that, Aspirin prevents blood from clotting and so helps prevent strokes. The Second European Stroke Prevention Study asked whether adding another anticlotting drug named dipyridamole would be more effective for patients who had already had a stroke. Here are the data on strokes during the two years of the study:

We need to explain in words what the null hypothesis H0:p1=p2=p3=p4says about the incidence of strokes.

06

Part(c) Step 2: Explanation

Aspirin reduces blood coagulation and hence helps to avoid strokes, according to the question. As a result, the question includes statistics on strokes during the two-year research. Thus, in a two-way table, the number of no strokes equals the number of patients minus the number of strokes, that is,

As a result, the null hypothesis in the question is written as follows:

H0:p1=p2=p3=p4

And the null hypothesis states that the proportion of successes for each treatment is the same, based on the participants' smoking behaviours.

07

Part(d) Step 1: Given information

Given in the question that, Aspirin prevents blood from clotting and so helps prevent strokes. The Second European Stroke Prevention Study asked whether adding another anticlotting drug named dipyridamole would be more effective for patients who had already had a stroke. Here are the data on strokes during the two years of the study:

We need to find the expected counts if H0is true, and

display them in a two-way table similar to the table of observed counts

08

Part (d) Step 2: Explanation

Aspirin reduces blood coagulation and hence helps to avoid strokes, according to the question. As a result, the question includes statistics on strokes during the two-year research. Thus, in a two-way table, the number of no strokes equals the number of patients minus the number of strokes, that is,

As a result, the null hypothesis in the question is written as:

H0:p1=p2=p3=p4

As a result, the expected counts are the total of the rows multiplied by the total of the columns, divided by the sample size n=6602, as follows:

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Birds in the trees Researchers studied the behavior of birds that were searching for seeds and insects in an Oregon forest. In this forest, 54% of the trees were Douglas 铿乺s, 40% were ponderosa pines, and 6% were other types of trees. At a randomly selected time during the day, the researchers observed 156red-breasted nuthatches: 70were seen in Douglas 铿乺s, 79in ponderosa pines, and 7 in other types of trees.2 Do these data suggest that nuthatches prefer particular types of trees when they鈥檙e searching for seeds and insects? Carry out a chi-square goodness-of-铿乼 test to help answer this question.

The conditions for carrying out the chi-square test in exercise T11.2 are

I. Separate random samples from the populations of interest.

II. Expected counts large enough.

III. The samples themselves and the individual observations in each sample are independent.

Which of the conditions is (are) satisfied in this case?

(a) I only

(d) Il and III only

(b) II only

(e) I, II, and III

(c) I and II only

Sorry, no chi-square We would prefer to learn from teachers who know their subject. Perhaps even pre-school children are affected by how knowledgeable they think teachers are. Assign 48three- and four-year-olds at random to be taught the name of a new toy by either an adult who claims to know about the toy or an adult who claims not to know about it. Then ask the children to pick out a picture of the new toy in a set of pictures of other toys and say its name. The response variable is the count of right answers in four tries. Here are the data:

The researchers report that children taught by the teacher who claimed to be knowledgeable did significantly better 2=20.24,P<0.05. Explain why this result isn't valid.

Gregor Mendel (1822鈥1884), an Austrian monk, is considered the father of genetics. Mendel studied the inheritance of various traits in pea plants. One such trait is whether the pea is smooth or wrinkled. Mendel predicted a ratio of 3smooth peas for every 1 wrinkled pea. In one experiment, he observed 423 smooth and133 wrinkled peas. The data were produced in such a way that the Random and Independent conditions are met. Carry out a chi-square goodness-of-fit test based on Mendel鈥檚 prediction. What do you conclude?

Canada has universal health care. The United States does not but often offers more elaborate treatment to patients with access. How do the two systems compare in treating heart attacks? Researchers compared random samples of 2600U.S. and 400Canadian heart attack patients. One key outcome was the patients鈥 own assessment of their quality of life relative to what it had been before the heart attack. Here are the data for the patients who survived a year:

Quality of lifeCanadaUnited StatesMuch better75541Somewhat better71498About the same96779Somewhat worse50282Much worse1965Total3112165

Is there a significant difference between the two distributions of quality-of-life ratings? Carry out an appropriate test at the =0.01level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.