/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q 74. Do reducing diets work? Dr. Lind... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Do reducing diets work? Dr. Linda Stern and her colleagues recruited 132obese adults at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Pennsylvania. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to a low-carbohydrate diet and the other half were assigned to a low-fat diet. Researchers measured each participant鈥檚 change in weight and cholesterol level after six months and again after one year. Subjects in the low-carb diet group lost significantly more weight than subjects in the low-fat diet group during the first six months of the study. At the end of a year, however, the average weight loss for subjects in the two groups was not significantly different.

(a) Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the diet treatments?

(b) Explain to someone who knows little statistics what 鈥渓ost significantly more weight鈥 means.

(c) The subjects in the low-carb diet group lost an aver-age of 5.1kg in a year. The subjects in the low-fat diet group lost an average of 3.1kg. Explain how this infor-

mation could be consistent with the fact that weight loss in the two groups was not significantly different.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) This is because randomization is one of the three principles of experimental design.

(b) It means that the difference in weights is large and it cannot be just by chance.

(c) The total weight difference is 2kg over a period of year which can be by chance.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

132participants were assigned diets randomly to obtain results for weight loss.

An experiment was conducted in which half participant was given low carbohydrate diet and half were given low fat diet. to examine change in weight and cholesterol. The participant in low carb diet lost an average of5.1 kg and subjects in low fat diet lost an average of3.1kg.

02

To explain why did researchers randomly assign the subjectsto the diet treatments

An experiment was conducted in which half participant was given low carbohydrate diet and half were given low fat diet. to examine change in weight and cholesterol. The researchers randomly assign the subjects as randomization is one of the three principles of experimental design. It is also done to make sure that different groups are as similar as possible.

03

To explain “lost significantly more weight” to one who don't understand statistics.

As the context of above experiment, 鈥渓ost significantly more weight鈥 means the difference in weight loss is large that cannot be due to chance and cannot be ignored.

04

To explain how this information could be consistent with the fact that weight loss in the two groups was not significantly different.

As per the results, the participant in low carb diet lost an average of 5.1kg and subjects in low fat diet lost an average of 3.1kg.

The total difference in weight loss was 2kg that appeared over a period of an year. This could be due to chance. Hence weight loss is not statistically significant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In an interesting experiment, researchers examined the effect of ultrasound on birth weight. Pregnant women participating in the study were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group of women received an ultrasound; the second group did not. When the subjects鈥 babies were born, their birth weights were recorded. The women who received the ultrasounds had heavier babies.

Did the experimental design take the placebo effect into account? Why is this important?

The manager of a sports arena wants to learn more about the financial status of the people who are attending an NBA basketball game. He would like to give a survey to a representative sample of the more than 20,000fans in attendance. Ticket prices for the game vary a great deal: seats near the court cost over \(100each, while seats in the top rows of the arena cost \)25each. The arena is divided into 30numbered sections, from 101to 130Each section has rows of seats labeled with letters from A (nearest the court) to ZZ (top row of the arena).

Explain why it might be difficult to give the survey to an SRS of 200 fans.

Explain it to the congresswoman You are on the staff of a member of Congress who is considering a bill that would provide government-sponsored insurance for nursing-home care. You report that 1128 letters have been received on the issue, of which 871 oppose the legislation. 鈥淚鈥檓 surprised that most of my constituents oppose the bill. I thought it would be quite popular,鈥 says the congresswoman. Are you convinced that a majority of the voters oppose the bill? How would you explain the statistical issue to the congresswoman?

Effects of class size Do smaller classes in elementary school really benefit students in areas such as scores on standardized tests, staying in school, and going on to college? We might do an observational study that compares students who happened to be in smaller and larger classes in their early school years. Identify a lurking variable that may lead to confounding with

the effects of small classes. Explain how confounding might occur.

Fabric science A maker of fabric for clothing is setting up a new line to 鈥渇inish鈥 the raw fabric. The line will use either metal rollers or natural-bristle rollers to raise the surface of the fabric; a dyeing-cycle time of either 30 or 40 minutes; and a temperature of either 150 or 175 Celsius. An experiment will compare all combinations of these choices. Three specimens of fabric will be subjected to each treatment and scored for quality.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.