/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q 1.1. A farmer brings a juice company ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A farmer brings a juice company several crates of oranges each week. A company inspector looks at 10 oranges from the top of each crate before deciding whether to buy all the oranges.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Convenience sampling.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Before selecting whether to buy all of the oranges, a business inspector examines ten oranges from the top of each crate.

02

Concept

A simple random sample (SRS) of size n is made up of n people chosen from the population with an equal chance of being the sample that is actually chosen.

03

Explanation

Convenience sampling is a sort of sampling in which the observations collected in a sample are easily accessible to a researcher. There is no probability mechanism for selecting a sample with this procedure. Only the top 10oranges from each available crate are checked by the business inspector. Because the inspector is determining whether or not to buy oranges based on his own convenience. As a result, convenience sampling could be considered. Convenience sampling is a sample method in which the sampling business is higher since it solely relies on the researcher's judgment. As a result, the sample does not produce consistent findings.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sampling at the mall You have probably seen the mall interviewer, approaching people passing by with a clipboard in hand. Explain why even a large sample of mall shoppers would not provide a trustworthy estimate of the current unemployment rate.

Seat belt uses A study in El Paso, Texas, looked at seat belt use by drivers. Drivers were observed at randomly chosen convenience stores. After they left their cars, they were invited to answer questions that included questions about seat belt use. In all, 75% said they always used seat belts, yet only 61.5% were wearing seat belts when they pulled into the store parking lots.16 Explain the reason for the bias observed in responses to the survey. Do you expect bias in the same direction in most surveys about seat belt use?

Reducing unemployment Will cash bonuses speed the return to work of unemployed people? A state department of labor notes that last year 68%of people who filed claims for unemployment insurance found a new job within 15weeks. As an experiment, this year the state offers $500to people filing unemployment claims if they find a job within 15weeks. The percent who do so increases to 77%. What flaw in the design of this experiment makes it impossible to say whether the bonus really caused the increase? Explain.

Stronger players A football coach hears that a new exercise program will increase upper-body strength better than lifting weights. He is eager to test this new program in the off-season with the players on his high school team. The coach decides to let his players choose which of the two treatments they will undergo

for three weeks—exercise or weight lifting. He will use the number of push-ups a player can do at the end of the experiment as the response variable.

(a) Which principle of experimental design does the coach’s plan violate? Explain how this violation could lead to confounding.

(b) Comment on the coach’s choice of response variable.

Meditation for anxiety An experiment that claimed to show that meditation lowers anxiety proceeded as follows. The experimenter interviewed the subjects and rated their level of anxiety. Then the subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimenter taught one group how to meditate and they meditated daily for a month. The other group was simply told to relax more. At the end of the month, the experimenter interviewed all the subjects again and rated their anxiety level. The meditation group now had less anxiety. Psychologists said that the results were suspect because the ratings were not blind. Explain what this means and how lack of blindness could bias the reported results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.