/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.52 Does breast-feeding weaken bones... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does breast-feeding weaken bones? Breast-feeding mothers secrete calcium into their milk. Some of the calcium may come from their bones, so mothers may lose bone mineral. Researchers compared a random sample of 47breast-feeding women with a random sample of 22women of similar age who were neither pregnant nor lactating. They measured the percent change in the bone mineral content (BMC) of the women's spines over three months. Comparative boxplots and summary statistics for the data from fathroom are shown below

(a) Based on the graph and numerical summaries, write a few sentences comparing the percent changes in BMC for the two groups.

(b) Is the mean change in BMC significantly lower for the mothers who are breast-feeding? Carry out an appropriate test to support your answer.

(c) Can we conclude that breast-feeding causes a mother's bones to weaken? Why or why not?

(d) Construct and interpret a95%confidence interval for the difference in mean bone mineral loss. Explain how this interval provides more information than the significance test in part (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Because there is a higher mean for nonpregnant and the boxplot is considerably more to the right, the Not Pregnant Centre likely to be greater than the Breastfeeding Centre. Because it has a higher standard deviation and more distance between the boxplot whiskers, the distribution seems to be larger than the distribution for the Breastfeed community Non-pregnant party. As the median of the boxplot farther to the left, both distributions appear to be right-skewed.

(b) Yes, breast-feeding mothers experience a significantly lower mean change in BMC.

(c) No, we can't deduce that breastfeeding weakens a mother's bones.

(d) -4.850,-2.943

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

Given in the question that,

We have to write a few sentences comparing the percent changes in BMC for the two groups.

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

Because there is a higher mean for nonpregnant and the boxplot is considerably more to the right, the Not Pregnant Centre likely to be greater than the Breastfeeding Centre. Because it has a higher standard deviation and more distance between the boxplot whiskers, the distribution seems to be larger than the distribution for the Breastfeed community Non-pregnant party. As the median of the boxplot farther to the left, both distributions appear to be right-skewed.

03

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information 

Given in the question that,

s1=2.50561s2=1.29832n1=47n2=22

x¯1=-3.58723x¯2=0.309091

We have to determine is the mean change in BMC significantly lower for the mothers who are breast-feeding.

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation 

The formula of test statistic is

t=x¯1-x¯2s12n1+s2m2=-3.58723-0.3000912.50561247+1.29832222=-8.499

The degree of freedom is

df=minn1-1,n2-1=min(47-1,22-1)=21

The P value is

P<0.0005P<0.05⇒rejectH0

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean change in BMC for breast-feeding women is significantly lower

05

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information  

We have to conclude that breast-feeding causes a mother's bones to weaken

06

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation 

An experiment purposely puts specific care on persons in order to examine their reactions. An observational research attempts to obtain details without upsetting the scene they are investigating. Observational Research Because the study is not an experiment, a correlation (that breastfeeding weakens mother's bones) cannot be inferred because the study could be influenced by unknown circumstances.A lurking variable is one that has a significant impact on the relationship between variables in an analysis but is not one of the analysed explanatory factors. If you wish to prove causation, you'll need to do an experiment.

07

Part (d) Step 1: Given Information  

Given in the question that,

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A researcher wants to determine whether or not a five-week crash diet is effective over a long period of time. A random sample of 15 dieters is selected. Each person's weight is recorded before starting the diet and one year after it is concluded. Based on the data shown below (weight in pounds), can we conclude that the diet has a long-term effect, that is, that dieters managed to not regain the weight they lost? Include appropriate statistical evidence to justify your answer.

42. Long words Mary was interested in comparing the mean word length in articles from a medical journal and an airline’s in-flight magazine. She counted the number of letters in the first 200 words of an article in
the medical journal and in the first 100 words of an article in the airline magazine. Mary then used Minitab statistical software to produce the histograms shown.

Dr Teresa Amabile conducted a study involving 47college students, who were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. The 23students in one group were given a list of statements about external reasons (E) for writing, such as public recognition, making money, or pleasing their parents. The 24students in the other group were given a list of statements about internal reasons (I) for writing, such as expressing yourself and enjoying playing with words. Both groups were then instructed to write a poem about laughter. Each student’s poem was rated separately by 12different poets using a creativity scale. The 12poets’ ratings of each student’s poem were averaged to obtain an overall creativity score. We used Fathom software to randomly reassign the 47subjects to the two groups 1000times, assuming the treatment received doesn’t affect each individual’s average creativity rating. The dot plot shows the approximate randomization distribution of x1-xE

(a) Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the two treatment groups?

(b) In the actual experiment, x1-xE=4.15. What conclusion would you draw? Justify your answer with appropriate evidence.

(c) Based on your conclusion in part (b), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Researchers are interested in evaluating the effect of a natural product on reducing blood pressure. This will be done by comparing the mean reduction in blood pressure of a treatment (natural product) group and a placebo group using a two-sample t-test. The researchers would like to be able to detect whether the natural product reduces blood pressure by at least 7points more, on average than the placebo. If groups of size 50are used in the experiment, a two-sample t-test using role="math" localid="1650436089340" α=0.01will have a power of 80%to detect a 7-point difference in mean blood pressure reduction. If the researchers want to be able to detect a 5-point difference instead, then the power of test

(a) would be less than 80%.

(b) would be greater than 80%.

(c) would still be 80%.

(d) could be either less than or greater than 80%, depending on whether the natural product is effective.

(e) would vary depending on the standard deviation of the data.

Mrs. Woods and Mrs. Bryan are avid vegetable gardeners. They use different fertilizers, and each claims that hers is the best fertilizer to use when growing tomatoes. Both agree to do a study using the weight of their tomatoes as the response variable. They had each planted the same varieties of tomatoes on the same day and fertilized the plants on the same schedule throughout the growing season. At harvest time, they each randomly select 15tomatoes from their respective gardens and weigh them. After performing a two-sample t-test on the difference in mean weights of tomatoes, they get t=5.24and P=0.0008. Can the gardener with the larger mean claim that her fertilizer caused her tomatoes to be heavier?

(a) No, because the soil conditions in the two gardens is a potential confounding variable.

(b) No, because there was no replication.

(c) Yes, because a different fertilizer was used on each garden.

(d) Yes, because random samples were taken from each garden.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.