/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 78 The progress of a type of cancer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 78

The progress of a type of cancer differs in women and men. Researchers want to design an experiment to compare three therapies for this cancer. They recruit 500 male and 300 female patients who are willing to serve as subjects. (a) Which are the blocks in this experiment: the cancer therapies or the two sexes? Why? (b) What are the advantages of a randomized block design over a completely randomized design using these 800 subjects? (c) Suppose the researchers had 800 male and no female subjects available for the study. What advantage would this offer? What disadvantage?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The blocks are the two sexes. Block design controls variability due to sex. Exclusively using males simplifies the study, but limits applicability to females.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Blocks

The blocks in this experiment are the two sexes: male and female. This is because researchers are separating subjects based on sex before randomly assigning therapies. This accounts for the potential difference in how cancer progresses in each sex.
02

Randomized Block Design Advantage

Randomized block design offers the advantage of accounting for gender differences in cancer progression. By blocking by sex, the researchers can control for variability between males and females, leading to more precise estimates of the treatment effect within each gender.
03

Evaluate Completely Randomized Design

In a completely randomized design, all subjects would be randomly assigned to treatments without considering gender. This could lead to misleading results if gender has a significant effect on cancer progression, as the variability linked with sex differences would not be accounted for.
04

Advantages with 800 Male Subjects

Having 800 male subjects exclusively would simplify the study by eliminating gender as a source of variability, focusing on treatment effect alone. However, the results would only be applicable to males, limiting generalizability.
05

Disadvantages with 800 Male Subjects

The core disadvantage is the lack of insight into how the therapies might work in females, which is critical since cancer progression differs between sexes. The study's findings would not be applicable to female patients, missing potential sex-specific efficacy and effects of the therapies.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experiment Design
When designing an experiment, researchers need to carefully consider how to set up their study to ensure reliable and valid results. In the given exercise, the experiment design focuses on comparing three cancer therapies. To effectively evaluate the therapies, researchers must control for variables that could affect the results. Here, the key variable is the sex of the patients, given the known differences in how cancer progresses between men and women.
  • Blocking: The experiment uses a randomized block design, which involves dividing subjects into blocks based on a specific characteristic鈥攊n this case, gender. By doing so, researchers can ensure that each therapy is tested fairly within each group, minimizing confounding variables like gender.
  • Randomization: Within each block, subjects are randomly assigned to one of the three therapy treatments. This randomization helps to eliminate bias and ensures that the treatment effects are not skewed by other variables.
This type of design is essential in studies where specific characteristics, such as gender, might influence the response to treatments.
Cancer Therapy Comparison
Comparing cancer therapies involves evaluating the effectiveness of each treatment method in slowing or halting cancer progression. The goal of the experiment in the exercise is to assess which therapy provides the best outcome for patients with a particular type of cancer. Using a randomized block design offers tangible benefits in this comparison.
  • Precision: By blocking by sex, any variation due to gender is controlled, allowing for a more precise estimate of each therapy's effect within each gender group.
  • Minimized Confounding: Randomized block design minimizes the impact of confounders, like gender, ensuring that observed effects are primarily due to the therapies rather than differences in gender responses.
By using this approach, researchers can confidently compare the therapies and determine their relative effectiveness within a controlled context.
Gender Differences in Cancer Study
Understanding gender differences in how cancer progresses and responds to therapy is critical for developing targeted treatments. In the given experiment, the inclusion of both male and female subjects reflects an awareness of these differences.
  • Accounting for Variability: Gender can significantly influence the progression of diseases and the effectiveness of treatments. By incorporating both genders in the study, researchers can gain insights into how therapies perform across different sex-specific paths of disease progression.
  • Generalizability:** Having insights into both male and female responses enhances the ability of the study to apply its findings to a broader population, supporting the development of therapies suitable for both sexes.
Excluding one gender, as discussed in the exercise, could limit the applicability of the results and miss crucial data on how therapies might work differently across genders.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A biologist would like to determine which of two brands of weed killer is less likely to harm the plants in a garden at the university. Before spraying near the plants, the biologist decides to conduct an experiment using 24 individual plants. Which of the following two plans for randomly assigning the treatments should the biologist use? Why? Plan A: Choose the 12 healthiest-looking plants. Apply Brand X weed killer to all 12 of those plants. Apply Brand Y weed killer to the remaining 12 plants. Plan B: Choose 12 of the 24 plants at random. Apply Brand X weed killer to those 12 plants and Brand Y weed killer to the remaining 12 plants.

An expert on worker performance is interested in the effect of room temperature on the performance of tasks requiring manual dexterity. She chooses temperatures of \(70^{\circ} F\) and \(90^{\circ} F\) as treatments. The response variable is the number of correct insertions, during a 30-minute period, in a peg-and-hole apparatus that requires the use of both hands simultaneously. Each subject is trained on the apparatus and then asked to make as many insertions as possible in 30 minutes of continuous effort. (a) Outline a completely randomized design to compare dexterity at 70掳 and 90掳. Twenty subjects are available. (b) Because individuals differ greatly in dexterity, the wide variation in individual scores may hide the systematic effect of temperature unless there are many subjects in each group. Describe in detail the design of a matched pairs experiment in which each subject serves as his or her own control.

Random sampling versus random assignment Explain the difference between the types of inference that can be made as a result of random sampling and random assignment.

A survey of drivers began by randomly sampling all listed residential telephone numbers in the United States. Of 45,956 calls to these numbers, 5029 were completed. The goal of the survey was to estimate how far people drive, on average, per day.14 (a) What was the rate of non response for this sample? (b) Explain how non response can lead to bias in this survey. Be sure to give the direction of the bias.

Suppose 1000 iPhones are produced at a factory today. Management would like to ensure that the phones鈥� display screens meet their quality standards before shipping them to retail stores. Since it takes about 10 minutes to inspect an individual phone鈥檚 display screen, managers decide to inspect a sample of 20 phones from the day鈥檚 production. (a) Explain why it would be difficult for managers to inspect an SRS of 20 iPhones that are produced today. (b) An eager employee suggests that it would be easy to inspect the last 20 iPhones that were produced today. Why isn鈥檛 this a good idea? (c) Another employee recommends inspecting every fiftieth iPhone that is produced. Explain carefully why this sampling method is not an SRS.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.