/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 77 Nurse-practitioners are nurses w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Nurse-practitioners are nurses with advanced qualifications who often act much like primary-care physicians. Are they as effective as doctors at treating patients with chronic conditions? An experiment was conducted with 1316 patients who had been diagnosed with asthma, diabetes, or high blood pressure. Within each condition, patients were randomly assigned to either a doctor or a nurse-practitioner. The response variables included measures of the patients鈥 health and of their satisfaction with their medical care after 6 months.\(^{43}\) (a) Which are the blocks in this experiment: the different diagnoses (asthma, etc.) or the type of care (nurse or doctor)? Why? (b) Explain why a randomized block design is preferable to a completely randomized design in this setting.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The blocks are the different diagnoses. (b) It controls variability within blocks for clearer analysis.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Treatment Groups

In this experiment, the treatment groups are divided based on the type of care: one group is treated by doctors, while the other group is treated by nurse-practitioners. These are not blocks but rather the independent variables that are manipulated.
02

Identify the Blocks

The blocks in this experiment are the different diagnoses: asthma, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Blocking is used to control for the effects of these conditions on the outcome, since they might have different underlying factors impacting the treatment results.
03

Reason for Randomized Block Design

A randomized block design is preferable because it controls for variability within the blocks (the different diagnoses). By randomly assigning the type of care within each block, researchers can isolate the effect of the care type more effectively. This design reduces confounding variables and allows for a clearer analysis of the differences in outcomes between treatment types.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Design
When conducting studies or experiments, it's crucial to have a well-planned experimental design to obtain valid and reliable results. Experimental design refers to the framework used to conduct an experiment. This framework is critical in ensuring that the results are not influenced by external factors or bias.

In our example, researchers are interested in understanding whether nurse-practitioners are as effective as doctors in treating patients with chronic conditions. To do this effectively, they set up the experiment to include patients treated by both doctors and nurse-practitioners, each suffering from conditions like asthma, diabetes, or high blood pressure.

The strength of a good experimental design lies in its ability to reduce or eliminate errors and bias. By clearly defining the treatment groups and blocking variables, researchers increase the reliability of their findings. This approach ensures that any differences in patient outcomes can be attributed to the type of care received, rather than other factors.
Treatment Groups
Treatment groups are central to understanding how various interventions, like different types of medical care, affect outcomes. In any experiment, treatment groups refer to the segments of participants who receive varying levels or kinds of the experimental treatment.

In the nurse-practitioner example, the treatment groups are defined by the type of care provided. One group of patients is treated by nurse-practitioners, and another by doctors. This is the primary focus in evaluating effectiveness.
  • The purpose of having distinct treatment groups is to ensure that the impact of different factors, like the caregiver's role, is clearly observable.
  • By comparing outcomes between these groups, researchers can draw conclusions about the efficiency and effectiveness of each treatment option.
Choosing clear and distinct treatment groups ensures that the study can address the research question reliably and accurately.
Blocking
Blocking is a technique used in experimental design to account for variability among units by separating them into groups, or "blocks," that share similar characteristics. It helps in managing factors that could skew the results if not controlled.

In this experiment, the blocks are defined by different diagnoses: asthma, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Each condition may respond differently to the type of care, so placing patients into blocks based on their specific condition helps in isolating the effect of the treatment type.
  • This technique reduces differences in outcomes that could arise from the underlying condition rather than the care type.
  • Allows for more accurate comparisons within the same block, removing the influence of the condition itself as a confounding variable.
Blocking enhances the study's ability to discern real differences attributable to the treatment variable.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are external influences that create confusion about what relationships exist between the study's variables. They may potentially distort or mask the effects of the independent variable being studied.

In an experiment assessing health care effectiveness, confounding variables might include patients' pre-existing health conditions, lifestyle factors, or other external medical interventions.
  • Confounding variables can seriously undermine the validity of a study by introducing alternative explanations for observed effects.
  • Addressing these through techniques such as randomization and blocking is essential, as done in this experiment where different medical conditions are controlled for as blocks.
By minimizing the impact of confounding variables, researchers are better able to ascertain the true effect of their treatment groups on the study outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do people naturally wake up earlier when they set an alarm before going to sleep? Justin decides to conduct his own experiment to find out. On Friday and Saturday nights, he doesn鈥檛 set the alarm before going to bed. On Monday and Tuesday, he sets the alarm for 7 a.m. Justin records the time when he wakes up each day and then compares his average wake-up time with and without the alarm. (a) Identify any flaws you see in the proposed design for this experiment. (b) Describe how you would design the experiment. Explain how your design addresses each of the problems you identified in (a).

A survey of drivers began by randomly sampling all listed residential telephone numbers in the United States. Of 45,956 calls to these numbers, 5029 were completed. The goal of the survey was to estimate how far people drive, on average, per day.14 (a) What was the rate of non response for this sample? (b) Explain how non response can lead to bias in this survey. Be sure to give the direction of the bias.

A newspaper advertisement for an upcoming TV show said: 鈥淪hould handgun control be tougher? You call the shots in a special call-in poll tonight. If yes, call 1-900-720-6181. If no, call 1-900-720-6182. Charge is 50 cents for the first minute.鈥 Explain why this opinion poll is almost certainly biased.

Dr. Linda Stern and her colleagues recruited 132 obese adults at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Pennsylvania. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to a low-carbohydrate diet and the other half were assigned to a low-fat diet. Researchers measured each participant鈥檚 change in weight and cholesterol level after six months and again after one year. Subjects in the low-carb diet group lost significantly more weight than subjects in the low-fat diet group during the first six months of the study. At the end of a year, however, the average weight loss for subjects in the two groups was not significantly different.\(^{42}\) (a) Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the diet treatments? (b) Explain to someone who knows little statistics what 鈥渓ost significantly more weight鈥 means. (c) The subjects in the low-carb diet group lost an average of 5.1 kg in a year. The subjects in the low-fat diet group lost an average of 3.1 kg. Explain how this information could be consistent with the fact that weight loss in the two groups was not significantly different.

A study in El Paso, Texas, looked at seat belt use by drivers. Drivers were observed at randomly chosen convenience stores. After they left their cars, they were invited to answer questions that included questions about seat belt use. In all, 75% said they always used seat belts, yet only 61.5% were wearing seat belts when they pulled into the store parking lots.16 Explain the reason for the bias observed in responses to the survey. Do you expect bias in the same direction in most surveys about seat belt use?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.