/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Explain why the conditions for u... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Explain why the conditions for using two-sample z procedures to perform inference about \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) are not met in the settings of Exercises 7 through 10 . Broken crackers We don鈥檛 like to find broken crackers when we open the package. How can makers reduce breaking? One idea is to microwave the crackers for 30 seconds right after baking them. Breaks start as hairline cracks called 鈥渃hecking.鈥 Assign 65 newly baked crackers to the microwave and another 65 to a control group that is not microwaved. After one day, none of the microwave group and 16 of the control group show checking.\(^{8}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Conditions aren't met due to the expected count of checking being 0 in the microwave group, violating normal approximation requirements.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Problem

This exercise involves determining whether the conditions for a two-sample z procedure are met for comparing two proportions regarding crackers' checking rates.
02

State Conditions for Two-Sample Z Test

The two-sample z procedure for proportions is appropriate if: 1) the samples are independent, 2) both np and n(1-p) for each sample are at least 10, and 3) the sample sizes are small relative to the populations ( < 10% of populations).
03

Calculate Expected Counts

The expected number of 'checking' crackers should be calculated for each group. For the microwave group, with p estimated as zero, the expected count of checking is 0 out of 65. For the control group, the expectation is that 16 out of 65 show checking.
04

Evaluate np and n(1-p)

For the microwave group, np = 0 and n(1-p) = 65. For the control group, np = 16 and n(1-p) = 49. Both expected counts should be at least 10 for statistical inference using normal approximation to be valid.
05

Assess Condition Fulfillment

The condition of np being at least 10 is not met for the microwave group, as np = 0. This violates the requirement for using the two-sample z procedure.
06

Conclusion

Since the conditions are not met, primarily due to the expected checking number being 0 for one group, the two-sample z procedure isn't valid. Alternative techniques, such as Fisher's exact test, might be more suitable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Inference
Statistical inference is the process where we use sample data to make estimates or test hypotheses about a population. It helps us draw conclusions from data that are subject to random variations or uncertainties. In this exercise, statistical inference is critical for determining whether the difference in checking rates between two cracker groups is significant.

When performing statistical inference, we often rely on certain conditions to be met. Without these conditions, any conclusions we draw may be misleading. For instance, the two-sample z test requires that the sample data meet specific criteria, like independence and sufficient sample size. By ensuring these conditions are met, we are more confident that our inferences accurately reflect the reality of the population being studied.
Proportions
Proportions provide a way to compare two groups by looking at the percentage of a specific outcome within each group. In our cracker example, proportions are used to assess the rate of checking in microwaved versus non-microwaved crackers.

To work with proportions, we need data on the successes (crackers showing checking) and the total number of trials (total crackers in each group). The proportion is calculated by dividing the number of successes by the total number of trials. This value helps express the frequency of the checking phenomenon as a percentage, allowing easier comparison between groups.

In cases where the proportions in each sample are vastly different, like having zero checks in the microwave group, interpreting these differences can be crucial for understanding the effect of microwaving on cracker durability.
Independent Samples
Independent samples mean that the observations in one sample do not affect or are not related to the observations in another sample. When testing hypotheses with two-sample tests, this independence is crucial to ensure that the results are non-biased.

In our problem, we have two groups of crackers: one microwaved and one not. These groups have no overlap, making them independent. Independence allows us to use the two-sample z test among other tests. However, if the conditions are not met, such as having too few observations in one group, the reliability of using this test can be compromised. Alternative methods might need to be considered when independent conditions aren't satisfied effectively.
Normal Approximation
Normal approximation is a technique used in statistical inference for estimating probabilities of a sample proportion when the sample size is large enough. It's based on the central limit theorem, which states that sample means become normally distributed as sample size increases.

For a two-sample z test, it's essential that the normal approximation condition is met. This usually means that both np and n(1-p) must be at least 10 for each group. These conditions ensure that the sample proportions can be considered approximately normally distributed.

In the cracker checking example, because the expected count of checking crackers is zero in the microwave group, the normal approximation is not applicable. Without meeting this criterion, any statistical test using normal distribution assumptions becomes invalid. This is why alternative testing methods might be required.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 23 through 26 involve the following setting. Some women would like to have children but cannot do so for medical reasons. One option for these women is a procedure called in vitro fertilization (IVF), which involves injecting a fertilized egg into the woman鈥檚 uterus. Acupuncture and pregnancy A study reported in the medical journal Fertility and Sterility sought to determine whether the ancient Chinese art of acupuncture could help infertile women become pregnant.\(^{18}\) One hundred sixty healthy women who planned to have IVF were recruited for the study. Half of the subjects (80) were randomly assigned to receive acupuncture 25 minutes before embryo transfer and again 25 minutes after the transfer. The remaining 80 women were assigned to a control group and instructed to lie still for 25 minutes after the embryo transfer. Results are shown in the table below. $$\begin{array}{ll}&{\text { Acupuncture group }} & {\text { Control group }} \\\ \text { Pregnant } & \quad\quad\quad\quad {34} & \quad\quad\quad {21} \\\ \text { Not Pregnant } & \quad\quad\quad\quad {46} & \quad\quad\quad {59} \\\ \text { Total } & \quad\quad\quad\quad {80} & \quad\quad\quad {80}\end{array}$$ Is the pregnancy rate significantly higher for women who received acupuncture? To find out, researchers perform a test of \(H_{0} : p_{1}=p_{2}\) versus \(H_{a} : p_{1}>p_{2},\) where \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) are the actual pregnancy rates for women like those in the study who do and don't receive acupuncture, respectively. (a) Name the appropriate test and check that the conditions for carrying out this test are met. (b) The appropriate test from part (a) yields a P-value of 0.0152. Interpret this P-value in context. (c) What conclusion should researchers draw at the \(\alpha=0.05\) significance level? Explain. (d) What flaw in the design of the experiment prevents us from drawing a cause-and-effect conclusion? Explain.

Happy customers As the Hispanic population in the United States has grown, businesses have tried to understand what Hispanics like. One study interviewed a random sample of customers leaving a bank. Customers were classified as Hispanic if they preferred to be interviewed in Spanish or as Anglo if they preferred English. Each customer rated the importance of several aspects of bank service on a 10-point scale.\(^{34}\) Here are summary results for the importance of 鈥渞eliability鈥 (the accuracy of account records and so on): $$\begin{array}{llll}{\text { Group }} & {n} & {\overline{x}} & {s_{x}} \\\ \hline \text { Anglo } & {92} & {6.37} & {0.60} \\ {\text { Hispanic }} & {86} & {5.91} & {0.93}\end{array}$$ (a) The distribution of reliability ratings in each group is not Normal. A graph of the data reveals no outliers. The use of two-sample t procedures is justified. Why? (b) Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean ratings of the importance of reliability for Anglo and Hispanic bank customers. (c) Interpret the 95% confidence level in the context of this study.

Literacy A researcher reports that 80\(\%\) of high school graduates but only 40\(\%\) of high school dropouts would pass a basic literacy test. Assume that the researcher's claim is true. Suppose we give a basic literacy test to a random sample of 60 high school graduates and a separate random sample of 75 high school dropouts. (a) Find the probability that the proportion of graduates who pass the test is at least 0.20 higher than the proportion of dropouts who pass. Show your work. (b) Suppose that the difference in the sample proportions (graduate 鈥 dropout) who pass the test is exactly 0.20. Based on your result in part (a), would this give you reason to doubt the researcher鈥檚 claim? Explain.

Sleep deprivation Does sleep deprivation linger for more than a day? Researchers designed a study using 21 volunteer subjects between the ages of 18 and 25. All 21 participants took a computer-based visual discrimination test at the start of the study. Then the subjects were randomly assigned into two groups. The 11 subjects in one group, D, were deprived of sleep for an entire night in a laboratory setting. The 10 subjects in the other group, A, were allowed unrestricted sleep for the night. Both groups were allowed as much sleep as they wanted for the next two nights. On Day 4, all the subjects took the same visual discrimination test on the computer. Researchers recorded the improvement in time (measured in milliseconds) from Day 1 to Day 4 on the test for each subject.\(^{41}\) We used Fathom software to randomly reassign the 21 subjects to the two groups 1000 times, assuming the treatment received doesn鈥檛 affect each individual鈥檚 time improvement on the test. The dotplot shows the approximate randomization distribution of \(\overline{x}_{\mathrm{A}}-\overline{x}_{\mathrm{D}}\). (a) Explain why the researchers didn鈥檛 let the subjects choose whether to be in the sleep deprivation group or the unrestricted sleep group. (b) In the actual experiment, \(\overline{x}_{\mathrm{A}}-\overline{x}_{\mathrm{D}}=15.92 .\) This value is marked with a blue line in the figure. What conclusion would you draw? Justify your answer with appropriate evidence. (c) Based on your conclusion in part (b), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Is red wine better than white wine? Observational studies suggest that moderate use of alcohol by adults reduces heart attacks and that red wine may have special benefits. One reason may be that red wine contains polyphenols, substances that do good things to cholesterol in the blood and so may reduce the risk of heart attacks. In an experiment, healthy men were assigned at random to drink half a bottle of either red or white wine each day for two weeks. The level of polyphenols in their blood was measured before and after the two-week period. Here are the percent changes in level for the subjects in both groups:\(^{31}\) Red wine: 3.58 .1\(\quad 7.44 .0 \quad 0.74 .98 .4 \quad 7.05 .5\) White wine: \(3.1 \quad 0.5-3.8\) 4.1 \(-0.62 .7 \quad 1.9-5.9 \quad 0.1\) (a) A Fathom dotplot of the data is shown below. Use the graph to answer these questions: \(\bullet\) Are the centers of the two groups similar or different? Explain. \(\bullet\) Are the spreads of the two groups similar or different? Explain. (b) Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean percent change in polyphenol levels for the red wine and white wine treatments. (c) Does the interval in part (b) suggest that red wine is more effective than white wine? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.