/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Does peer victimization during a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does peer victimization during adolescence have an impact on depression in early adulthood? A study in the United Kingdom examined data on 3898 participants for which the researchers had information on both victimization by peers at age 13 and the presence of depression at age \(18 .\) The study found more than a two-fold increase in the odds of depression between children who were not victimized and those who were frequently victimized. \(\underline{21}\) This is an example of a. an observational study. b. a randomized comparative experiment. c. a block design, with level of victimization as the blocks.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This is an example of an observational study.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Study Type

The problem introduces a research study conducted in the UK examining the connection between peer victimization at age 13 and depression at age 18. We need to determine if this is an observational study, a randomized comparative experiment, or a block design study.
02

Understand Observational Study Characteristics

In an observational study, researchers observe outcomes without manipulating any variables. They assess the relationship between variables as they naturally occur. Here, the researchers observe victimization and depression but do not intervene.
03

Understand Randomized Comparative Experiment Characteristics

In a randomized comparative experiment, subjects are randomly assigned to different groups to receive various treatments or conditions. This helps establish causality. However, in the given study, subjects are not assigned to be victimized or not.
04

Understand Block Design Characteristics

A block design involves dividing participants into groups (blocks) based on certain characteristics before applying treatments. The study describes victimization but does not assign it, nor does it use blocks to assign treatment.
05

Classify the Study Using Definitions

Based on the lack of manipulation and assignment, the study does not fit a randomized comparative design or a block design. The study only observes and records data on victimization and depression, which fits the definition of an observational study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Peer Victimization
Peer victimization occurs when a child or adolescent is repeatedly targeted by their peers in a negative manner. This can include physical aggression, verbal harassment, or exclusion from a group. Victimization can have serious consequences for the mental and emotional health of young people.
It's crucial to understand that being a victim of bullying can lead to issues such as low self-esteem, anxiety, and academic struggles. These negative outcomes are not just temporary; they can persist into later stages of life, including adulthood.
Observing how peer victimization at a young age, especially around 13, might affect adolescents as they grow older is vital for developing effective intervention strategies. Recognizing the signs early can help prevent long-lasting impact on a young person’s life.
Adolescence
Adolescence is a critical developmental period that spans the ages between childhood and adulthood, typically from 10 to 19 years. During this time, individuals experience profound physical, emotional, and social changes.
This stage is characterized by exploration, identity formation, and a search for independence. It is also a time when peer influence becomes incredibly significant, often impacting decisions and behaviors.
Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to peer pressure and victimization. The need for acceptance and fear of rejection can lead them to endure harmful situations. Understanding the challenges faced during this period is essential for providing the right support and guidance.
  • Factors like changing friendships, increasing academic pressure, and family dynamics can also affect how adolescents react to peer victimization.
  • Supportive environments at home and school can help mitigate some negative effects.
Depression
Depression during early adulthood can often be linked to experiences faced during adolescence. This mental health disorder is more than just feeling sad; it affects how a person thinks, feels, and handles daily activities.
It is essential to recognize that symptoms of depression might include persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, changes in appetite or weight, and trouble sleeping. Early identification and treatment are crucial for managing depression effectively.
The study mentioned reveals a significant link between earlier experiences of peer victimization and increased chances of depression later. This underscores the importance of addressing bullying during the adolescence period to potentially reduce the incidence of depression in adulthood.
  • Interventions focused on improving self-esteem and social skills can be beneficial.
  • Engaging with mental health professionals early can make a significant difference in outcomes.
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal research involves studying the same group of individuals over time to observe changes and developments. This method is particularly useful for understanding long-term effects and patterns.
In the context of peer victimization and depression, longitudinal studies can help researchers gain insights into how early life experiences impact later outcomes.
Conducting a longitudinal study requires careful data collection and management as it involves tracking the same participants over extended periods. It offers a more comprehensive understanding compared to snapshot studies.
  • This research method allows for observing natural development without intervening.
  • It helps in identifying cause-and-effect relationships by noting consistent patterns.
Longitudinal research can inform policies and practices aimed at minimizing the negative effects of peer victimization by offering evidence-based data that highlight critical intervention points.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

.Treating Sinus Infections. Sinus infections are common, and doctors commonly treat them with antibiotics. Another treatment is to spray a steroid solution into the nose. A well-designed clinical trial found that these treatments, alone or in combination, do not reduce the severity or the length of sinus infections. \(\frac{34}{4}\) The clinical trial was a completely randomized experiment that assigned 240 patients at random among four treatments, as follows: a. The report of this study in the Journal of the American Medical Association describes it as a "double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled factorial trial." "Factorial" means that the treatments are formed from more than one factor. What are the factors? What do "double-blind" and "placebo-controlled" mean? b. If the random assignment of patients to treatments did a good job of eliminating bias, possible lurking variables such as smoking history, asthma, and hay fever should be similar in all four groups. After recording and comparing many such variables, the investigators said that "all showed no significant difference between groups." Explain to someone who knows no statistics what "no significant difference" means. Does it mean that the presence of all these variables was exactly the same in all four treatment groups?

Quick Randomizing. Here's a quick and easy way to randomize. You have 100 subjects: 50 adults under the age of 65 and 50 who are 65 or older. Toss a coin. If it's heads, assign all the adults under the age of 65 to the treatment group and all those 65 and over to the control group. If the coin comes up tails, assign all those 65 and over to treatment and all those under the age of 65 to the control group. This gives every individual subject a \(50-50\) chance of being assigned to treatment or control. Why isn't this a good way to randomly assign subjects to treatment groups?

Let Them Eat Chocolate. There is some evidence that cocoa has beneficial effects on heart health. To study this, researchers decide to give subjects either a cocoa pill or a placebo daily for a two-year period. Measurements of the subjects' heart health, based on a questionnaire, before and after the two-year period, are to be compared. ? a. Out line the design of this experiment, using 20 subjects, with 10 assigned to each group b. Here are the names of the 20 subjects. Use software or Table B at line 129 to carry out the randomization your design requires. \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline Abel & Devore & Kennedy & Reichert & Stout \\ \hline Aeffner & Fleming & Lamone & Riddle & Williams \\ \hline Birkel & Fritz & Mani & Sawant & Wilson \\ \hline Bower & Giriunas & Mattos & Scannell & Worbis \\ \hline \end{tabular} c. Do you think this can be run as a double-blind experiment? Explain.

Running and Sleep. Sufficient sleep is important for adolescents for both their neural and psychological development. Despite this, daytime sleepiness and poor physical and psychological functioning related to chronic sleep disturbances are common. A growing body of evidence suggests that exercise is associated with both better sleep and improved psychological functioning. Sixty participants were recruited from a high school in northwestern Switzerland. They were randomly assigned to either a running group or a control group, 30 to each group. The running group ran every morning for a little over 30 minutes on weekdays for a threeweek period. All participants used a sleep log for subjective evaluation of sleep, and sleep was also objectively assessed at the beginning and end of the study using a sleep electroencephalographic device that measured quantities such as sleep efficiency and time spent in the four different sleep phases. Running was found to positively impact both objective and subjective measures of sleep functioning.25 a. What are the explanatory variable(s) and the response variable(s)? b. Outline the design of the experiment. c. Here are some more details on the treatment and control groups. All participants arrived at school at 7 A.M., and the running group did two laps on the track and then ran cross country in groups of least four people for 30 minutes. The control group remained seated at the track, worked on homework, and interacted with each other. When the runners returned, all participants prepared for school and ate a breakfast that was provided. Why do you think the experimenters had the control group arrive at \(7 \mathrm{~A}\).M., interact with classmates, and have breakfast together? Explain. Do you think having the control group do these activities is important for the types of conclusions that can be reached? How? d. Time to sleep onset was measured before the beginning of the study and again at the end of the study for participants in both groups. Can this be considered a randomized controlled experiment with time to sleep onset as the response and four treatments (runners before, runners after, controls before, and controls after)? Explain why or why not.

Comparing Breathing Frequencies in Swimming. Researchers from the United Kingdom studied the effect of two breathing frequencies on both performance times and several physiological parameters in front crawl swimming. - \(^{-1}\) The breathing frequencies were one breath every second stroke (B2) and one breath every fourth stroke (B4). Subjects were 10 male collegiate swimmers. Each subject swam 200 meters, once with breathing frequency B2 and once on a different day with breathing frequency B4. a. Describe the design of this matched pairs experiment, including the randomization required by this design. Explain how you might carry out the randomization. b. Could this experiment be conducted using a completely randomized design? How would the design differ from the matched pairs experiment? c. Suppose we allow each swimmer to choose a breathing frequency and then swim 200 meters using the selected frequency. Are there any problems with then comparing the performance of the two breathing frequencies?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.