/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 How Useful Is Regression? Figure... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

How Useful Is Regression? Figure 4.9 (page \(\underline{116}\) ) displays the relationship between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2019 Masters Tournament. The correlation is \(r=0.283\). Eigure \(4.3\) (page 105 ) gives data on number of boats registered in Florida and the number of manatees killed by boats for the years 1977 to 2018. The correlation is \(r=0.919\). Explain in simple language why knowing only these correlations enables you to say that prediction of manatee deaths from number of boats registered by a regression line will be much more accurate than prediction of a golfer's second-round score based on that golfer's first-round score.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Higher correlation (0.919) indicates more accurate predictions for manatees and boats than golfers' scores (0.283).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding correlation

The correlation coefficient \( r \) quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from \(-1\) to \(1\), where \(1\) indicates a perfect positive linear relationship, \(-1\) indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, and \(0\) indicates no linear relationship.
02

Correlation values interpretation

In this exercise, the correlation between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2019 Masters Tournament is given as \( r = 0.283 \), which is relatively low. This suggests a weak positive linear relationship between the scores of the two rounds. In contrast, the correlation between the number of boats registered in Florida and the number of manatees killed by boats is \( r = 0.919 \), indicating a strong positive linear relationship.
03

Regression and prediction accuracy

In regression analysis, a higher correlation coefficient implies that the regression line will better fit the data. This means predictions based on the regression line will be more accurate. With \( r = 0.919 \) for manatees and boats, the regression line can explain much of the variability, allowing for accurate predictions of manatee deaths. For golfers, \( r = 0.283 \) suggests the regression will not fit the data well, leading to less accurate predictions of second-round scores based on first-round scores.
04

Drawing the conclusion

Given the strong correlation \( r = 0.919 \) between boat registrations and manatee deaths, the relationship is more predictable, and the regression line can be used for accurate forecasts. The smaller \( r = 0.283 \) for golfer scores reflects a weaker relationship, resulting in less reliable predictions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Relationship
The concept of a linear relationship is foundational in understanding how two variables change together. When we talk about linear relationships, we often use the correlation coefficient ( r ). This handy number tells us how closely two things are related. It ranges from -1 to 1:
  • 1 means a perfect positive linear relationship exists, where one variable increases, the other does so in a perfectly proportional manner.
  • -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, where an increase in one variable results in a perfectly proportional decrease in the other.
  • 0 suggests no linear relationship at all.

In the exercise example, two correlations are discussed. The weak positive correlation ( r = 0.283 ) between golfers' first and second-round scores suggests they don’t have a strong consistent pattern. On the other hand, a strong positive correlation ( r = 0.919 ) between boat registrations and manatee deaths shows these variables move closely together, indicating a reliable linear relationship.
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is like drawing a best-fit line through data points on a graph. This line helps us predict one variable based on another. When we use regression analysis, a strong correlation encourages confidence in the predictions we make.

In regression analysis, the slope and placement of the line are influenced by the strength of the correlation. Stronger correlations provide a more distinct slope and tighter alignment of data points to the line. In our case, the line used to predict manatee deaths based on boat registrations is based on a strong correlation of r = 0.919 , suggesting we can make very accurate predictions.

However, with a lesser correlation between golfers' scores ( r = 0.283 ), our regression line will not fit the data as well, making predictions of future scores less reliable. Regression analysis thrives on strong correlations for accurate forecasting.
Prediction Accuracy
Prediction accuracy in regression boils down to how well we can guess the outcome of one variable using another. A stronger correlation coefficient indicates higher prediction accuracy. Let's break down why this matters:
  • High correlation (close to 1 or -1) often means we can trust our prediction line to give results close to reality.
  • Low correlation (close to 0) leads to less confidence, and could mean other factors influence the predicted variable.

For manatee deaths and boats, with a strong r = 0.919 , the high prediction accuracy allows for effective forecasting. In contrast, predicting a golfer's second score isn't as reliable since r = 0.283 suggests lower accuracy.
Ultimately, knowing the strength of a correlation helps us manage expectations on how well we can predict outcomes using regression analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers measured the percentage of body fat and the preferred amount of salt (percentage weight/volume) for several children. Here are data for seven children:16 ln SALT \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline Preferred amount of satt \(x\) & \(0.2\) & \(0.3\) & \(0.4\) & \(0.5\) & \(0.6\) & \(0.8\) & \(1.1\) \\ \hline Percentage of body fat \(y\) & 20 & 30 & 22 & 30 & 39 & 23 & 30 & \\ \hline \end{tabular} Using your calculator or software, what is the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting percentage of body fat based on the preferred amount of salt? a. \(\hat{y}=24.2+6.0 x\) b. \(\hat{y}=0.15+0.01 x\) c. \(\hat{y}=6.0+24.2 x\)

Are You Happy? Exercise 4.26 (page 117) discusses a study in which the mean BRFSS life-satisfaction score of individuals in each state was compared with the mean of an objective measure of well-being (based on the "compensating-differentials method") for each state. Suppose that instead of the means for the states, the BRFSS life-satisfaction scores for individuals were compared with the corresponding measure of well-being (based on the compensating-differentials method) for these individuals. Would you expect the correlation between the mean state scores on these two measures to be lower, about the same, or higher than the correlation between the scores of individuals on these two measures? Explain your answer.

Husbands and Wives. The mean height of American women in their twenties is about \(64.3\) inches, and the standard deviation is about \(2.7\) inches. The mean height of men the same age is about \(69.9\) inches, with standard deviation about \(3.1\) inches. Suppose that the correlation between the heights of husbands and wives is about \(r=0.5\). a. What are the slope and intercept of the regression line of the husband's height on the wife's height in young couples? Interpret the slope in the context of the problem. b. Draw a graph of this regression line for heights of wives between 56 and 72 inches. Predict the height of the husband of a woman who is 67 inches tall and plot the wife's height and predicted husband's height on your graph. c. You don't expect this prediction for a single couple to be very accurate. Why not?

Grade Inflation and the SAT. The effect of a lurking variable can be surprising when individuals are divided into groups. In recent years, the mean SAT score of all high school seniors has increased. But the mean SAT score has decreased for students at each level of high school grade averages (A, B, C, and so on). Explain how grade inflation in high school (the lurking variable) can account for this pattern.

Fred keeps his savings in his mattress. He began with \(\$ 10,000\) from his mother and adds \(\$ 200\) each year. His total savings \(y\) after \(x\) years are given by the equation a. \(y=10,000+200 x\). b. \(y=200+10,000 x\). c. \(y=10,000+x\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.