/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 Smokers don't live as long (on t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Smokers don't live as long (on the average) as nonsmokers, and heavy smokers don't live as long as light smokers. You regress the age at death of a group of male smokers on the number of packs per day they smoked. The slope of your regression line a. will be greater than 0 . b. will be less than 0 . c. can't be determined without seeing the data.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The slope of the regression line will be less than 0.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Slope

The slope in a regression line indicates the relationship between the independent variable (number of packs per day) and the dependent variable (age at death). A **positive slope** suggests that as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable also increases. Conversely, a **negative slope** indicates that as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable decreases.
02

Analyze the Relationship

According to the problem, heavy smokers tend to live less than light smokers, meaning that as the number of packs per day increases, the age at death decreases. This identifies a negative relationship between smoking intensity and lifespan.
03

Determine the Slope

Given the negative relationship identified in the analysis, the slope of the regression line should be **less than 0**. This is expected because the increase in the number of packs per day (an increase in smoking intensity) is associated with a decrease in the age at death.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Slope Interpretation
In regression analysis, interpreting the slope is crucial to understanding the relationship between the variables being studied. The slope tells us how much the dependent variable changes for a one-unit change in the independent variable. Simply put, if the slope is positive, as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable also increases. If the slope is negative, as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable decreases.

In the context of the smoking example, the independent variable is the number of packs per day, and the dependent variable is the age at death. A negative slope, therefore, suggests that as the number of packs per day increases, the age at death decreases. This implies a negative correlation or inverse relationship between smoking and lifespan. Always remember:
  • Positive slope: Both variables move in the same direction.
  • Negative slope: Variables move in opposite directions.
You can visualize this on a graph where the downward slope of the line through the data points confirms that smoking more decreases lifespan.
Dependent and Independent Variables
Understanding the concept of dependent and independent variables is fundamental when performing a regression analysis. The independent variable is the one you manipulate or consider as the "cause" in the equation, while the dependent variable is the "effect" or the outcome you measure.

In the exercise about smoking, the independent variable is the "number of packs per day smoked," because it is the factor that we assume has an effect on the outcome. The dependent variable is the "age at death," as this is the result we are observing and analyzing based on changes in smoking behavior.
  • Independent Variable: Often represented on the X-axis in graphs.
  • Dependent Variable: Typically displayed on the Y-axis.
Identifying these variables correctly is essential to accurately interpret the results of your regression analysis.
Negative Correlation
Negative correlation describes a relationship between two variables where one variable increases while the other decreases. When dealing with regression analysis, a negative correlation is represented by a downward sloping line, indicating that as one variable's value rises, the other falls.

In our smoking example, there is a negative correlation between the number of packs smoked per day and the age at death. This means that higher smoking rates lead to a decrease in expected lifespan.
  • Negative correlation: As one goes up, the other goes down.
  • The correlation coefficient will be less than 0.
Recognizing this type of relationship helps to predict and understand the dynamics of cause-and-effect in varied scenarios, confirming that smoking more can negatively impact longevity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Grade Inflation and the SAT. The effect of a lurking variable can be surprising when individuals are divided into groups. In recent years, the mean SAT score of all high school seniors has increased. But the mean SAT score has decreased for students at each level of high school grade averages (A, B, C, and so on). Explain how grade inflation in high school (the lurking variable) can account for this pattern.

Is Math the Key to Success in College? A College Board study of 15,941 high school graduates found a strong correlation between how much math minority students took in high school and their later success in college. News articles quoted the head of the College Board as saying that "math is the gatekeeper for success in college." Maybe so, but we should also think about lurking variables. What might lead minority students to take more or fewer high school math courses? Would these same factors influence success in college?

How Useful Is Regression? Figure 4.9 (page \(\underline{116}\) ) displays the relationship between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2019 Masters Tournament. The correlation is \(r=0.283\). Eigure \(4.3\) (page 105 ) gives data on number of boats registered in Florida and the number of manatees killed by boats for the years 1977 to 2018. The correlation is \(r=0.919\). Explain in simple language why knowing only these correlations enables you to say that prediction of manatee deaths from number of boats registered by a regression line will be much more accurate than prediction of a golfer's second-round score based on that golfer's first-round score.

A Few More Dollars, One More Year. Data on the average income of all men who died in the past year in several U.S. counties showed a positive correlation with average age of death of men who died in the past year in the counties. Would the correlation be greater, smaller, or about the same if you calculated the correlation between the incomes of individual men who died in the past year and their age at death? Explain your answer.

Regression to the Mean. Ejgure. \(4.9\) (page 116 ) displays the relationship between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2019 Masters Tournament. The least-squares line for predicting second-round scores \((y)\) from first-round scores \((x)\) has equation \(\hat{y}=62.91+0.164 x\). Find the predicted second-round scores for a player who shot 80 in the first round and for a player who shot 70 . The mean second-round score for all players was 75.02. So, a player who does well in the first round is predicted to do less well, but still better than average, in the second round. In addition, a player who does poorly in the first is predicted to do better, but still worse than average, in the second. (Comment: This is regression to the mean. If you select individuals with extreme scores on some measure, they tend to have less extreme scores when measured again. That's because their extreme position is partly merit and partly luck, and the luck will be different next time. Regression to the mean contributes to lots of "effects." The rookie of the year often doesn't do as well the next year; the best player in an orchestral audition may play less well once hired than the runners-up; a student who feels she needs coaching after taking the SAT often does better on the next try without coaching.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.