/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 44 The First Child Has Higher IQ. D... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The First Child Has Higher IQ. Does the birth order of a family's children influence their IQ scores? A careful study of 241,310 Norwegian 18- and 19 -year-olds found that firstborn children scored \(2.3\) points higher on the average than second children in the same family. This difference was highly significant \((P<0.001)\). A commentator said, "One puzzle highlighted by these latest findings is why certain ot her within-family studies have failed to show equally consistent results. Some of these previous null findings, which have all been obtained in much smaller samples, may be explained by inadequate stat istical power." \(\underline{12}\) a. Explain in simple language why tests having low power often fail to give evidence against a null hypothesis even when the hypothesis is really false. b. Do you think a difference of \(2.3\) points in IQ scores is an important difference?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Low power means missing true effects; 2.3 IQ points may matter depending on context.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Statistical Power

Statistical power is the probability that a test will reject a false null hypothesis. When a test has low power, it means there is a high chance of falsely accepting the null hypothesis, even if it is actually false. This occurs because the sample size is too small to detect a true difference or effect.
02

Importance of Sample Size

A small sample size can lead to a lack of statistical power. With fewer observations, the test is less likely to detect a true difference, leading to more frequent Type II errors, where a false null hypothesis is not rejected.
03

Evaluating the IQ Difference

Consider whether a 2.3 point increase in IQ scores (in a scale typically ranging from 85 to 115) is significant. This depends on the context, such as the potential impacts this difference might have in real-world settings like educational attainment or job performance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis ( ull H_0 ) is a fundamental concept in statistical testing. It is a default assumption that there is no effect, difference, or relationship between groups or variables being tested. For example, in the study of IQ scores among siblings, the null hypothesis might state that birth order does not affect IQ scores.
In hypothesis testing, researchers aim to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. If the evidence from the data is strong enough to suggest otherwise, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Understanding the null hypothesis is crucial because it sets the stage for the entire testing process. It helps researchers define what they are testing and understand what results could mean in the context of their study.
Type II Error
A Type II error occurs when a statistical test fails to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false. This is also known as a "false negative". In simpler terms, it's like saying "there's no difference" when, in fact, there is.
In the context of the IQ study, a Type II error would mean concluding that birth order does not affect IQ when it actually does. This type of error can often happen when the test has low statistical power, which is influenced by factors such as sample size and the true effect size.
Minimizing Type II errors is crucial in research as they can lead to missing out on potentially important findings. Adequate planning, such as increasing the sample size, can help in reducing the likelihood of Type II errors.
Sample Size
Sample size refers to the number of observations or data points included in a study. It plays a significant role in the accuracy and reliability of hypothesis testing.
A larger sample size generally provides more reliable and robust results. This is because larger samples give a clearer picture of the population, reducing the margin of error and increasing the test's statistical power.
In the case of the Norwegian study, the large sample size of 241,310 participants contributed to the statistical power, allowing detection of small differences in IQ scores. A smaller sample might not have revealed such distinctions, increasing the likelihood of Type II errors.
IQ Difference
IQ, or Intelligence Quotient, is a measure used to assess human intelligence. In this study, an average IQ difference of 2.3 points was observed between firstborns and second children.
On an IQ scale typically ranging from 85 to 115 for average intelligence, a difference of 2.3 points may seem small. However, its importance depends on the context.
Considerations include potential impacts on educational outcomes or career opportunities. In some contexts, even small differences can lead to significant real-world effects.
  • For educators: Understanding even slight differences might inform teaching strategies.
  • For policy makers: Such findings could influence educational policies or resource allocation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sensitive Questions. The 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Survey found that 194 individuals in its random sample of 1450 Ohio high school students said that they had carried a weapon such as a gun, knife, or club in the previous 30 days. That's \(13.4 \%\) of the sample. Why is this estimate likely to be biased? Do you think it is biased high or low? Does the margin of error of a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of all Ohio high school students who had carried a weapon such as a gun, knife, or club in the previous 30 days allow for this bias?

Searching for ESP. A researcher looking for evidence of extrasensory perception (ESP) tests 1000 subjects. Forty-three of these subjects do significantly better \((P<0.05)\) than random guessing. a. Forty-three seems like a lot of people, but you can't conclude that these 43 people have ESP. Why not? b. What should the researcher now do to test whether any of these 43 subjects have ESP?

A medical experiment compared zinc supplements with a placebo for reducing the duration of colds. Let \(\mu\) denote the mean decrease, in days, in the duration of a cold. A decrease to \(\mu=2\) is a practically important decrease. The significance level of a test of \(H_{0}: \mu=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>0\) is defined as a. the probability that the test fails to reject \(H_{0}\) when \(\mu=2\) is true. b. the probability that the test rejects \(H_{0}\) when \(\mu=2\) is true. c. the probability that the test rejects \(H_{0}\) when \(\mu=0\) is true.

Find the Error Probabilities. You have an SRS of size \(n=25\) from a Normal distribution with \(\sigma=2.0\). You wish to test $$ \begin{aligned} &H_{0}: \mu=0 \\ &H_{a}: \mu>0 \end{aligned} $$ You decide to reject \(H_{0}\) if \(x>0\) and not reject \(H_{0}\) otherwise. a. Find the probability of a Type I error. That is, find the probability that the test rejects \(H_{0}\) when in fact \(\mu=0\). b. Find the probability of a Type II error when \(\mu=0.5\). This is the probability that the test fails to reject \(H_{0}\) when in fact \(\mu=0.5\). c. Find the probability of a Type II error when \(\mu=1.0\).

The most important condition for sound conclusions from statistical inference is usually that a. the P-value we calculate is small. b. the population distribution is exactly Normal. c. the data can be thought of as a random sample from the population of interest.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.