/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 A medical experiment compared zi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A medical experiment compared zinc supplements with a placebo for reducing the duration of colds. Let \(\mu\) denote the mean decrease, in days, in the duration of a cold. A decrease to \(\mu=1\) is a practically important decrease. The significance level of a test of \(H_{0}: \mu=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>0\) is defined as (a) the probability that the test rejects \(H_{0}\) when \(\mu=0\) is true. (b) the probability that the test rejects \(H_{0}\) when \(\mu=1\) is true. (c) the probability that the test fails to reject \(H_{0}\) when \(\mu=1\) is true.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (a) is the significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Hypotheses

We have the null hypothesis, \( H_{0} : \mu = 0 \), which states that the zinc supplements have no effect on the duration of the cold. The alternative hypothesis, \( H_{a} : \mu > 0 \), suggests that zinc supplements reduce the duration of colds.
02

Defining Significance Level

The significance level is the probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis \( H_{0} \) when it is actually true.
03

Analyzing Options

(a) pertains to rejecting \( H_{0} \) when it is true, which aligns with the definition of significance level. (b) and (c) involve scenarios where \( \mu = 1 \), thus not directly relating to the null hypothesis being true.
04

Solution

The significance level describes the scenario in option (a), where we reject \( H_{0} \) when \( \mu = 0 \) is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, the significance level is a crucial component for decision making. It is denoted by \( \alpha \), and represents the probability of making a Type I error. This occurs when the null hypothesis \( H_0 \) is rejected even though it is true. Essentially, it measures how willing we are to take the risk of rejecting a true null hypothesis.

The significance level is pre-determined by the researcher and commonly set at values like 0.05 or 0.01. This threshold helps us determine whether the results of an experiment are statistically significant.

  • Setting a significance level of 0.05, for example, implies a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none.
  • The smaller the significance level, the stronger the evidence must be to reject the null hypothesis.
Understanding the significance level is fundamental to interpreting results in experiments such as testing zinc supplements' effect on colds.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), is a foundational concept in hypothesis testing. It is a statement that there is no effect or difference, and it serves as the default or starting assumption for any statistical test.

In the given exercise, the null hypothesis \( H_0 : \mu = 0 \) suggests that zinc supplements have no effect on cold duration. This means that the average decrease in cold duration due to the supplement is zero.

  • It offers a benchmark against which the strength of the observed data is tested.
  • Failing to reject the null hypothesis implies insufficient evidence to support a real effect.
However, failing to reject \( H_0 \) is not equivalent to proving it true. It simply means that, based on the evidence, the null hypothesis stands unchallenged.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by \( H_a \), claims the opposite of the null hypothesis. It posits that there is an effect or difference. In the given scenario, \( H_a : \mu > 0 \) implies that zinc supplements do indeed reduce the duration of a cold, meaning the mean decrease in cold duration is greater than zero.

The purpose of conducting a hypothesis test is often to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

  • If the evidence from the data is strong enough, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
  • Unlike the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis indicates the presence of a specific effect or difference.
When the statistical test results show a p-value less than the significance level, it suggests we have enough evidence to reject \( H_0 \) and support \( H_a \), indicating zinc supplements effectively reduce cold duration.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How much education children get is strongly associated with the wealth and social status of their parents. In social science jargon, this is socioeconomic status, or SES. But the SES of parents has little influence on whether children who have graduated from college go on to yet more education. One study looked at whether college graduates took the graduate admissions tests for business, law, and other graduate programs. The effects of the parents' SES on taking the LSAT test for law school were "both statistically insignificant and small." (a) What does "statistically insignificant" mean? (b) Why is it important that the effects were small in size as well as insignificant?

An article in the New England Journal of Medicine describes a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of using a balloon with a special coating in angioplasty (the repair of blood vessels) compared with a standard balloon. According to the article, the study was designed to have power \(90 \%\), with a two-sided Type I error of \(0.05\), to detect a clinically important difference of approximately 17 percentage points in the presence of certain lesions 12 months after surgery. 13 (a) What fixed significance level was used in calculating the power? (b) Explain to someone who knows no statistics why power \(90 \%\) means that the experiment would probably have been significant if there was a difference between the use of the balloon with a special coating compared to the use of the standard balloon.

The 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Survey found that 349 individuals in its random sample of 1367 Ohio high school students said that they had texted or emailed while driving in the previous 30 days. That's \(25.5 \%\) of the sample. Why is this estimate likely to be biased? Do you think it is biased high or low? Does the margin of error of a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of all Ohio high school students who texted or emailed while driving in the previous 30 days allows for this bias?

A writer in a medical journal says: "An uncontrolled experiment in 37 women found a significantly improved mean clinical symptom score after treatment. Methodologic flaws make it difficult to interpret the results of this study." The writer is skeptical about the significant improvement because (a) there is no control group, so the improvement might be due to the placebo effect or to the fact that many medical conditions improve over time. (b) the \(P\)-value given was \(P=0.048\), which is too large to be convincing. (c) the response variable might not have an exactly Normal distribution in the population.

How sensitive are the untrained noses of students? Exercise \(16.27\) (page 390) gives the lowest levels of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) that 10 students could detect. You want to estimate the mean DMS odor threshold among all students and you would be satisfied to estimate the mean to within \(\pm 0.1\) with \(99 \%\) confidence. The standard deviation of the odor threshold for untrained noses is known to be \(\sigma=7\) micrograms per liter of wine. How large an SRS of untrained students do you need?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.