/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 The coach of a Canadian universi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The coach of a Canadian university's men's hockey team records the resting heart rates of the 26 team members. You should not trust a confidence interval for the mean resting heart rate of all male students at this Canadian university based on these data because (a) with only 26 observations, the margin of error will be large. (b) heart rates may not have a Normal distribution. (c) the members of the hockey team can't be considered a random sample of all students.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (c) is correct: the hockey team members aren't a random sample of all students.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Question

The exercise asks why we shouldn't trust a confidence interval for the mean resting heart rate of all male students based on the data from the hockey team.
02

Analyze Option (a)

Option (a) suggests that with only 26 observations, the margin of error will be large. While 26 is a relatively small sample size, it is generally sufficient for constructing a confidence interval if the sample is random and representative, and if the underlying assumptions are met.
03

Analyze Option (b)

Option (b) suggests heart rates may not have a Normal distribution. While a Normal distribution is needed for small sample sizes to make accurate conclusions through a confidence interval, we can often assume normality using the Central Limit Theorem with 26 observations, provided the sample is random and not heavily skewed.
04

Analyze Option (c)

Option (c) suggests that the members of the hockey team can't be considered a random sample of all students. This is critical because the team members likely have different physical fitness levels compared to the general student body, meaning they don't represent a random or unbiased sample.
05

Conclude with Correct Reason

Considering all options, the most critical reason why we shouldn't trust the confidence interval is because the hockey team's heart rates do not represent a random or unbiased sample of all students (Option c). This leads to an unrepresentative sample, which invalidates the statistical basis for the interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals are a fundamental concept in statistics and statistical inference. They provide a range of values within which we estimate a population parameter, such as the mean, will fall. The range is defined by two main elements: the estimate from the sample data and a margin of error. The margin of error accounts for variability and gives a sense of the uncertainty in our estimate.

When constructing confidence intervals, certain assumptions must be met to ensure their accuracy. These include having a sufficiently large and random sample, alongside the data typically following a normal distribution, especially if the sample size is small. If these assumptions aren't met, the confidence interval may not accurately reflect the population parameter. This is the case in the exercise, where the sample of hockey players isn't representative of all students, leading to unreliable intervals.
Sampling Methods
Sampling methods play a crucial role in ensuring the reliability of our statistical inferences, such as confidence intervals. A random sample is one in which every individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected. This randomness helps in generalizing findings from the sample to the population accurately.

In the exercise, members of the hockey team were used as a sample to represent all male students. However, this is not a random sample as they likely have distinct characteristics, such as higher physical fitness, compared to the general student population. This non-random nature leads to bias, which skews the results and makes the findings not generalizable beyond the team itself. Always aim for samples that are random and represent the diversity of the entire population for more accurate and effective statistical analysis.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is a powerful statistical principle that simplifies data analysis by stating that the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normally distributed, provided the sample size is sufficiently large, usually 30 or more. This holds true regardless of the population's distribution.

In the context of the original exercise, the CLT would allow us to assume a normal distribution of sample means if the data were a random and unbiased sample. However, with only 26 observations and the sample being non-random (as it only includes hockey team members), the CLT's guarantee of normality and reliability of the interval estimate is weakened. This makes the confidence interval derived from this sample unreliable for making general statements about the entire student body.
Data Analysis
Data analysis involves inspecting, cleaning, and modeling data to discover useful information to support decision-making. It often starts with gathering data using appropriate sampling methods to ensure validity and reliability.

Once data is collected, it's crucial to understand whether the data set meets the assumptions required for the statistical methods you intend to use. For example, checking for normality and randomness in the sample distribution. In the exercise, the data analysis reveals that the sample isn't random or representative of the whole student population, invalidating inferences about all students' heart rates.

Careful data analysis ensures conclusions drawn are trustworthy and reflect the true characteristics of the population, guiding reliable decision-making processes.`

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following questions does a test of significance answer? Briefly explain your replies. (a) Is the sample or experiment properly designed? (b) Is the observed effect due to chance? (c) Is the observed effect important?

A July 2015 Gallup poll asked a national sample of 1009 adults aged 18 and over if they actively avoided drinking soda or pop. Of those sampled, \(61 \%\) indicated they do so. Gallup announced the poll's margin of error for \(95 \%\) confidence as \(\pm 4\) percentage points. Which of the following sources of error are included in this margin of error? (a) Gallup dialed landline telephone numbers at random and so missed all people without landline phones, including people whose only phone is a cell phone. (b) Some people whose numbers were chosen never answered the phone in several calls or answered but refused to participate in the poll. (c) There is chance variation in the random selection of telephone numbers.

How much education children get is strongly associated with the wealth and social status of their parents. In social science jargon, this is socioeconomic status, or SES. But the SES of parents has little influence on whether children who have graduated from college go on to yet more education. One study looked at whether college graduates took the graduate admissions tests for business, law, and other graduate programs. The effects of the parents' SES on taking the LSAT test for law school were "both statistically insignificant and small." (a) What does "statistically insignificant" mean? (b) Why is it important that the effects were small in size as well as insignificant?

Here are data on the percent change in the total mass (in tons) of wildlife in several West African game preserves in the years 1971 to \(1999:^{9}\) $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} \hline 1971 & 1972 & 1973 & 1974 & 1975 & 1976 & 1977 & 1978 & 1979 & 1980 \\ 2.9 & 3.1 & -1.2 & -1.1 & -3.3 & 3.7 & 1.9 & -0.3 & -5.9 & -7.9 \\ \hline 1981 & 1982 & 1983 & 1984 & 1985 & 1986 & 1987 & 1988 & 1989 & 1990 \\ -5.5 & -7.2 & -4.1 & -8.6 & -5.5 & -0.7 & -5.1 & -7.1 & -4.2 & 0.9 \\ \hline 1991 & 1992 & 1993 & 1994 & 1995 & 1996 & 1997 & 1998 & 1999 & \\ -6.1 & -4.1 & -4.8 & -11.3 & -9.3 & -10.7 & -1.8 & -7.4 & -22.9 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Software gives the \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean annual percent change as \(-6.66 \%\) to \(-2.55 \%\). There are several reasons we might not trust this interval. (a) Examine the distribution of the data. What feature of the distribution throws doubt on the validity of statistical inference? (b) Plot the percents against year. What trend do you see in this time series? Explain why a trend over time casts doubt on the condition that years 1971 to 1999 can be treated as an SRS from a larger population of years.

At the Statistics Canada website, WWW. statcan.gc. ca, you can find the percent of adults in each province or territory who have at least a university certificate, diploma, or degree at bachelor's level or above. It makes no sense to find \(x^{-} \bar{x}\) for these data and use it to get a confidence interval for the mean percent \(\mu\) in all 13 provinces or territories. Why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.