/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Pets Researchers at the National... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Pets Researchers at the National Cancer Institute released the results of a study that investigated the effect of weed-killing herbicides on house pets. They examined 827 dogs from homes where an herbicide was used on a regular basis, diagnosing malignant lymphoma in 473 of them. Of the 130 dogs from homes where no herbicides were used, only 19 were found to have lymphoma. a) What's the standard error of the difference in the two proportions? b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for this difference. c) State an appropriate conclusion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Standard error is approximately 0.047; 95% confidence interval is [0.334, 0.518]; Herbicides likely increase lymphoma risk.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Parameters

Let \( p_1 \) be the proportion of dogs with lymphoma where herbicides were used, and \( p_2 \) be the proportion of dogs with lymphoma where no herbicides were used. Calculate \( p_1 = \frac{473}{827} \) and \( p_2 = \frac{19}{130} \).
02

Calculate the Proportions

Calculate the proportions: \( p_1 = \frac{473}{827} \approx 0.572 \) and \( p_2 = \frac{19}{130} \approx 0.146 \).
03

Compute the Standard Error (SE)

The standard error for the difference in proportions \( SE(p_1 - p_2) \) is given by \( \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1 - p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1 - p_2)}{n_2}} \), where \( n_1 = 827 \) and \( n_2 = 130 \). Substitute the values to find the SE.
04

Substitute Values in the SE Formula

Calculate the standard error: \[ SE(p_1 - p_2) = \sqrt{\frac{0.572 \times 0.428}{827} + \frac{0.146 \times 0.854}{130}} \approx 0.047 \].
05

Calculate the 95% Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is given by \( (p_1 - p_2) \pm Z \times SE(p_1 - p_2) \). For 95%, \( Z \approx 1.96 \). Calculate \( (0.572 - 0.146) \pm 1.96 \times 0.047 \).
06

Find the Confidence Interval

Calculate: Difference \( = 0.426 \), Margin of Error \( = 1.96 \times 0.047 \approx 0.092 \). So, the 95% confidence interval is \( 0.426 \pm 0.092 \) or \([0.334, 0.518]\).
07

State the Conclusion

Since the confidence interval \([0.334, 0.518]\) does not include 0, there is a significant difference in the proportion of lymphoma in dogs from homes using herbicides compared to those that do not. This suggests herbicides might increase the risk of lymphoma in dogs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Difference
Understanding the difference in proportions is crucial when comparing two groups. In this exercise, we have two groups of dogs: those living in homes with herbicide use and those without. We want to know the difference in the incidence of malignant lymphoma between these groups.

To find this difference, we calculate the proportion of affected dogs in each group. For homes where herbicides were used, this proportion is represented by \( p_1 = \frac{473}{827}\). In homes without herbicides, the proportion is \( p_2 = \frac{19}{130} \).

The difference in proportions is then simply \( p_1 - p_2 \). This number tells us how much more likely it is for dogs in herbicide-using homes to develop lymphoma compared to those in non-herbicide-using homes. A positive difference suggests a higher potential risk in the first group.
Herbicide Effect
The exercise explores the effect of herbicides on the development of malignant lymphoma in dogs. Herbicides are chemicals used to kill unwanted plants, such as weeds. However, their use around house pets can pose unintended health risks.

In this study, researchers discovered that a significant portion of dogs exposed to regular herbicide use were diagnosed with malignant lymphoma, a type of cancer. Understanding this effect is vital as it can inform pet owners about potential risks and guide them in making safer choices for their pets' environment.
  • Regular exposure: The study distinguishes between homes that regularly use herbicides and those that do not.
  • Impact of exposure: Higher rates of lymphoma in the herbicide-using group suggest a potential health impact on pets.
By examining the herbicide effect, we can begin to understand the correlation between chemical exposure and pet health, prompting further investigation into safer gardening practices.
Malignant Lymphoma
Malignant lymphoma is a serious condition that's prominent in this study's context. It refers to a type of cancer that affects the lymphatic system, which is part of the body's immune system.

For dogs, malignant lymphoma is among the most common cancers diagnosed. The lymph nodes, spleen, and other immune organs are primarily affected. Symptoms can include swelling, lethargy, weight loss, and loss of appetite.
  • Early detection: Important for treatment success.
  • Common in canines: Many dogs are diagnosed each year, making it a crucial focus area for veterinary medicine.
The link explored in this exercise between herbicide exposure and malignant lymphoma highlights environmental risk factors that may exacerbate or contribute to the onset of the disease in canines.
Standard Error
When comparing two group proportions, the standard error (SE) is a critical statistical concept. It helps quantify the uncertainty in the estimate of the difference between the two proportions.

The standard error for the difference in proportions is calculated using the formula:\[SE(p_1 - p_2) = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1 - p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1 - p_2)}{n_2}}\]where \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes of the respective groups.

This value is crucial as it determines the margin of error in the confidence interval calculation. A larger standard error indicates more variability and less precision in the proportion difference estimate, while a smaller standard error signifies greater precision.
  • Provides context: Helps determine precision of estimate between groups.
  • Affects confidence intervals: Directly influences the breadth of the interval.
Understanding standard error allows researchers to assess how confidently they can report differences between groups, addressing natural variability in data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Twins In \(2001,\) one county reported that, among 3132 white women who had babies, 94 were multiple births. There were also 20 multiple births to 606 black women. Does this indicate any racial difference in the likelihood of multiple births? a) Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion in context. b) If your conclusion is incorrect, which type of error did you commit?

Name recognition A political candidate runs a weeklong series of TV ads designed to attract public attention to his campaign. Polls taken before and after the ad campaign show some increase in the proportion of voters who now recognize this candidate's name, with a P-value of 0.033. Is it reasonable to believe the ads may be effective?

Graduation In October 2000 the U.S. Department of Commerce reported the results of a large-scale survey on high school graduation. Researchers contacted more than 25,000 randomly chosen Americans aged 24 years to see if they had finished high school; \(84.9 \%\) of the 12,460 males and \(88.1 \%\) of the 12,678 females indicated that they had high school diplomas. a) Are the assumptions and conditions necessary for inference satisfied? Explain. b) Create a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in graduation rates between males and females. c) Interpret your confidence interval. d) Does this provide strong evidence that girls are more likely than boys to complete high school? Explain.

Buy it again? A consumer magazine plans to poll car owners to see if they are happy enough with their vehicles that they would purchase the same model again. They'll randomly select 450 owners of American-made cars and 450 owners of Japanese models. Obviously, the actual opinions of the entire population couldn't be known, but suppose \(76 \%\) of owners of American cars and \(78 \%\) of owners of Japanese cars would purchase another. a) What sampling design is the magazine planning to use? b) What difference would you expect their poll to show? c) Of course, sampling error means the poll won't reflect the difference perfectly. What's the standard deviation for the difference in the proportions? d) Sketch a sampling model for the difference in proportions that might appear in a poll like this. e) Could the magazine be misled by the poll, concluding that owners of American cars are much happier with their vehicles than owners of Japanese cars? Explain.

Non-profits, part 2 The researchers from Exercise 2 created a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportions who are "highly satisfied" among people who work at non-profits versus people who work at for- profit companies. a) Interpret the interval with a sentence in context. \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{\text {non-profits }}-p_{\text {for-profits }}=(1.77 \%, 10.50 \%)\) b) For this interval, explain what "95\% confidence" means.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.