/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 More \(P\) -values Which of the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

More \(P\) -values Which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a) A very low \(P\) -value provides evidence against the null hypothesis. b) A high P-value is strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. c) A P-value above 0.10 shows that the null hypothesis is true. d) If the null hypothesis is true, you can't get a P-value below 0.01.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) True, b) False, c) False, d) False.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding P-values

A P-value measures the probability of observing data as extreme as or more extreme than what was actually observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A low P-value indicates that such extreme observations are unlikely under the null hypothesis.
02

Analyzing Statement a

Statement a: "A very low \(P\) -value provides evidence against the null hypothesis." This statement is true because a very low P-value suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true, thus providing evidence against the null hypothesis.
03

Analyzing Statement b

Statement b: "A high P-value is strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis." This statement is false. A high P-value indicates that the observed data is not unusual under the null hypothesis, but it is not considered strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. It merely suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected.
04

Analyzing Statement c

Statement c: "A P-value above 0.10 shows that the null hypothesis is true." This statement is false. A P-value above 0.10 indicates that there is weak evidence against the null hypothesis, but it does not show that the null hypothesis is true. P-values do not provide proof of truth.
05

Analyzing Statement d

Statement d: "If the null hypothesis is true, you can't get a P-value below 0.01." This statement is false. Even if the null hypothesis is true, it is still possible (though unlikely) to observe sample data that results in a P-value below 0.01 due to random chance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
When we talk about the null hypothesis in statistics, we're referring to a kind of default assumption about a population parameter. This concept is crucial in hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis, often denoted as \( H_0 \), is typically a statement of "no effect" or "no difference." It suggests that any observed change or difference in data is due to chance or random fluctuations rather than a significant effect.

For example, if we are looking at a new drug's effectiveness, the null hypothesis might state that the drug has no effect on patients. In practice, the goal of our test is to gather enough evidence to cast doubt on this null hypothesis, thereby allowing us to consider an alternative explanation (called the alternative hypothesis). It's important to remember that the null hypothesis assumes we begin with the belief that there's nothing new or significant happening. The test then determines if there's sufficient statistical evidence to reject this assumption.
Evidence Against Null Hypothesis
When conducting a hypothesis test, we collect data and calculate a P-value. The P-value is a measure of the probability that, assuming the null hypothesis is true, the observed data (or more extreme) occurred by random chance.

If we end up with a very low P-value, it suggests that such an occurrence is quite rare under the null hypothesis. This rarity provides evidence against the null hypothesis, leading us to suspect that there may be some true effect or difference in play. In science and research, we often use a threshold, such as 0.05, to determine if a P-value is "low" enough to challenge our confidence in the null hypothesis.
  • A low P-value implies unlikely events under the null hypothesis assumption.
  • It often prompts researchers to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, when you have a low P-value, you have evidence suggesting that the null hypothesis might not be the best explanation for your data, encouraging further investigation into potential alternative hypotheses.
High P-value
A high P-value is an outcome of hypothesis testing that indicates that the observed data is not significantly uncommon under the null hypothesis. This means that there's a high probability that the data occurred by chance, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

While it might seem that a high P-value suggests that the null hypothesis is "true," that's not the case. It's more accurate to say that there isn't sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we don't accept the null hypothesis as true; we simply do not have enough evidence to say it's false.
  • A high P-value means observed data is consistent with the null hypothesis.
  • It suggests not rejecting the null hypothesis, but doesn't confirm it as true.
It’s essential to emphasize that hypothesis tests do not prove hypotheses true or false; they merely assess evidence towards them.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a term used to determine whether the results obtained in a study are likely not due to random chance. When results are statistically significant, they indicate a certain level of confidence that an observed effect or difference is real, and not just a product of random variation in the data.

To measure statistical significance, we often use a significance level (denoted by \( \alpha \)), such as 0.05. This threshold helps determine whether a P-value is considered "significant." If the P-value is less than \( \alpha \), the results are deemed statistically significant, which means we have enough confidence to reject the null hypothesis.
  • Statistical significance helps decide if an effect/difference is genuine.
  • Common significance level is 0.05; P-values below this indicate significance.
While statistical significance is a helpful tool, it's important to understand that it doesn't measure the size of an effect or its practical importance; it only suggests whether an effect is likely real given the sample data observed.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Spam Spam filters try to sort your e-mails, deciding which are real messages and which are unwanted. One method used is a point system. The filter reads each incoming e-mail and assigns points to the sender, the subject, key words in the message, and so on. The higher the point total, the more likely it is that the message is unwanted. The filter has a cutoff value for the point total; any message rated lower than that cutoff passes through to your inbox, and the rest, suspected to be spam, are diverted to the junk mailbox. We can think of the filter's decision as a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis is that the e-mail is a real message and should go to your inbox. A higher point total provides evidence that the message may be spam; when there's sufficient evidence, the filter rejects the null, classifying the message as junk. This usually works pretty well, but, of course, sometimes the filter makes a mistake. a) When the filter allows spam to slip through into your inbox, which kind of error is that? b) Which kind of error is it when a real message gets classified as junk? c) Some filters allow the user (that's you) to adjust the cutoff. Suppose your filter has a default cutoff of 50 points, but you reset it to \(60 .\) Is that analogous to choosing a higher or lower value of \(\alpha\) for a hypothesis test? Explain. d) What impact does this change in the cutoff value have on the chance of each type of error?

Dropouts A Statistics professor has observed that for several years about \(13 \%\) of the students who initially enroll in his Introductory Statistics course withdraw before the end of the semester. A salesman suggests that he try a statistics software package that gets students more involved with computers, predicting that it will cut the dropout rate. The software is expensive, and the salesman offers to let the professor use it for a semester to see if the dropout rate goes down significantly. The professor will have to pay for the software only if he chooses to continue using it. a) Is this a one-tailed or two-tailed test? Explain. b) Write the null and alternative hypotheses. c) In this context, explain what would happen if the professor makes a Type I error. d) In this context, explain what would happen if the professor makes a Type II error. e) What is meant by the power of this test?

Pottery An artist experimenting with clay to create pottery with a special texture has been experiencing difficulty with these special pieces. About \(40 \%\) break in the kiln during firing. Hoping to solve this problem, she buys some more expensive clay from another supplier. She plans to make and fire 10 pieces and will decide to use the new clay if at most one of them breaks. a) Suppose the new, expensive clay really is no better than her usual clay. What's the probability that this test convinces her to use it anyway? (Hint: Use a Binomial model.) b) If she decides to switch to the new clay and it is no better, what kind of error did she commit? c) If the new clay really can reduce breakage to only \(20 \%,\) what's the probability that her test will not detect the improvement? d) How can she improve the power of her test? Offer at least two suggestions.

Hypotheses and parameters As in Exercise \(1,\) for each of the following situations, define the parameter and write the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of parameter values. a) Seat-belt compliance in Massachusetts was \(65 \%\) in \(2008 .\) The state wants to know if it has changed. b) Last year, a survey found that \(45 \%\) of the employees were willing to pay for on-site day care. The company wants to know if that has changed. c) Regular card customers have a default rate of \(6.7 \%\) A credit card bank wants to know if that rate is different for their Gold card customers.

P-values Which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a) A very high P-value is strong evidence that the null hypothesis is false. b) A very low \(P\) -value proves that the null hypothesis is false. c) A high P-value shows that the null hypothesis is true. d) A P-value below 0.05 is always considered sufficient evidence to reject a null hypothesis.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.