/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 A friend of yours claims to be p... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A friend of yours claims to be psychic. You are skeptical. To test this you take a stack of 100 playing cards and have your friend try to identify the suit (hearts, diamonds, clubs, or spades), without looking, of course! a) State the null hypothesis for your experiment. b) State the alternative hypothesis. You did the experiment and your friend correctly identified more than \(25 \%\) of the cards. c) A hypothesis test gave a P-value of 0.014. What do you conclude? d) What would you conclude if the P-value had been \(0.245 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) H0: p = 0.25 b) Ha: p > 0.25 c) Reject null hypothesis (might be psychic) d) Fail to reject null hypothesis (not enough evidence).

Step by step solution

01

State the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis ( H0 ) is an assumption that there is no effect or difference. In this case, the null hypothesis is that your friend is simply guessing, which means that he would correctly identify the suit of each card by random chance. For four suits, the chance for a correct guess is 25 percent. Thus, H_0: p = 0.25 .
02

State the Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis ( Ha ) is what you want to test for, indicating that it contradicts the null hypothesis. In this scenario, the alternative hypothesis is that your friend is psychic, which means he can identify more than 25 percent of the cards correctly. Therefore, Ha: p > 0.25 .
03

Evaluate Conclusion with P-value 0.014

A P-value of 0.014 indicates the probability of observing results as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed results, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Since 0.014 is less than the common significance level (such as 0.05 ), we reject the null hypothesis. This suggests your friend might have psychic abilities based on the test.
04

Evaluate Conclusion with P-value 0.245

A P-value of 0.245 indicates the probability of observing results as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed results, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Since 0.245 is greater than the typical significance level (such as 0.05 ), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This implies there is not enough evidence to conclude that your friend is psychic.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, often represented as \(H_0\), is a critical starting point. It is essentially a default position or a statement of no effect or no difference. In the case of your psychic friend experiment, the null hypothesis would assume that your friend does not have psychic powers.

You would state this by saying that your friend is guessing the suits of the cards, thus being right purely due to random chance. Given there are four suits, the probability of guessing correctly is \(25\%\) or \(0.25\). It would be written mathematically as \(H_0: p = 0.25\). This hypothesis sets a benchmark for the test, guiding what we expect without any special abilities involved.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_a\), is the statement that challenges the null hypothesis. It suggests there is an effect or a difference. In the context of testing your friend's psychic abilities, the alternative hypothesis would imply that your friend is indeed psychic.

For this scenario, you would assume that your friend can correctly identify more than \(25\%\) of the cards because of psychic abilities. Mathematically, it is expressed as \(H_a: p > 0.25\). The alternative hypothesis is what you are testing for; hence, if evidence supports this, you consider rejecting the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
P-value
The P-value is a measure used in statistical hypothesis testing to determine the significance of the results. It provides the probability of observing results at least as extreme as those measured during the experiment, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
  • If the P-value is small, it implies that observed results are unlikely under the null hypothesis, suggesting the possibility of rejecting \(H_0\).
  • In your friend's psychic test, a P-value of \(0.014\) means there's a \(1.4\%\) chance that your friend would guess correctly to this extent or more just by chance. A P-value of \(0.245\) indicates a much higher probability \(24.5\%\), signaling no strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Understanding P-value helps determine the likelihood of getting results under the assumptions made by the null hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, usually denoted as \( \alpha \), is the threshold set before testing that defines how much risk you are willing to take to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Typical significance levels are \(0.05\) or \(0.01\).

For example, if you set \(\alpha\) to \(0.05\), it means you accept a \(5\%\) risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. This threshold helps in deciding whether the P-value obtained is considered statistically significant.
  • If the P-value is less than this threshold, you reject the null hypothesis.
  • If the P-value is greater, you "fail to reject" or retain the null hypothesis.

This concept is central to making decisions in hypothesis testing, determining the strength of the evidence needed to support changes in initial assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The seller of a loaded die claims that it will favor the outcome \(6 .\) We don't believe that claim, and roll the die 200 times to test an appropriate hypothesis. Our P-value turns out to be 0.03. Which conclusion is appropriate? Explain. a) There's a \(3 \%\) chance that the die is fair. b) There's a \(97 \%\) chance that the die is fair. c) There's a \(3 \%\) chance that a loaded die could randomly produce the results we observed, so it's reasonable to conclude that the die is fair. d) There's a \(3 \%\) chance that a fair die could randomly produce the results we observed, so it's reasonable to conclude that the die is loaded.

A very large study showed that aspirin reduced the rate of first heart attacks by \(44 \% . \mathrm{A}\) pharmaceutical company thinks they have a drug that will be more effective than aspirin, and plans to do a randomized clinical trial to test the new drug. a) What is the null hypothesis the company will use? b) What is their alternative hypothesis? They conducted the study and found that the group using the new drug had somewhat fewer heart attacks than those in the aspirin group. c) The P-value from the hypothesis test was 0.28. What do you conclude? d) What would you have concluded if the P-value had been 0.004?

An appliance manufacturer stockpiles washers and dryers in a very large warehouse for shipment to retail stores. Sometimes in handling them the appliances get damaged. Even though the damage may be minor, the company must sell those machines at drastically reduced prices. The company goal is to keep the level of damaged machines below \(2 \% .\) One day an inspector randomly checks 60 washers and finds that 5 of them have scratches or dents. Is this strong evidence that the warehouse is failing to meet the company goal? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. Be sure the appropriate assumptions and conditions are satisfied before you proceed.

The College Board reported that \(58.7 \%\) of all students who took the 2010 AP Statistics exam earned scores of 3 or higher. One teacher wondered if the performance of her school was better. She believed that year's students to be typical of those who will take AP Stats at that school and was pleased when 34 of her 54 students achieved scores of 3 or better. Can she claim that her school is better? Explain.

Some people are concerned that new tougher standards and high-stakes tests adopted in many states have driven up the high school dropout rate. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that the high school dropout rate for the year 2004 was \(10.3 \% .\) One school district whose dropout rate has always been very close to the national average reports that 210 of their 1782 high school students dropped out last year. Is this evidence that their dropout rate may be increasing? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.