/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Test the correlation, as indicat... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Test the correlation, as indicated. Show all details of the test. Test for a negative correlation; \(r=-0.41\); \(n=18\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on this analysis, it is not clear that there is a statistically significant negative correlation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the given correlation coefficient and sample size

The given correlation coefficient (r) is -0.41 and the sample size (n) is 18.
02

Identify the critical value and its negative

We need to look up the critical value for a correlation coefficient at a particular alpha level (usually 0.05) for the given sample size in a statistical table. For 18 samples, the critical value with an alpha of 0.05 is approximately +/- 0.444. So, the positive critical value is 0.444 and the negative critical value is -0.444.
03

Compare the absolute value of the given correlation coefficient with the absolute value of the negative critical value

With absolute values, we can remove the negativity of the given correlation coefficient and compare it with the negative critical value. The absolute value of the given correlation coefficient is |-0.41| = 0.41. The absolute value of the negative critical value is |-0.444| = 0.444.
04

Draw the conclusion about correlation

Since 0.41 (the absolute value of given correlation coefficient) is less than 0.444 (the absolute value of the negative critical value), we cannot reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the correlation in our sample is not statistically significant, and we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant negative correlation in the population.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a concept that helps us decide whether the results we observe in a study are likely due to chance or if they reflect a genuine effect in the population. In simpler terms, it tells us if what we're seeing is meaningful or merely random noise.
When testing a correlation, we determine statistical significance by comparing the correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables, to a critical value. This comparison helps us decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, which we'll discuss later.
Statistical significance often depends on a predetermined significance level, usually denoted as \( \alpha \), which is typically set at 0.05. This means that we are willing to accept a 5% chance of incorrectly concluding that a relationship exists when it doesn’t. In practical terms, if our result is statistically significant, we can be reasonably confident it exists in the target population. Consequently, understanding statistical significance is crucial for accurate data interpretation and making well-informed decisions.
Critical Value
The critical value is a threshold that our test statistic (in this case, the correlation coefficient) must surpass for us to consider our results statistically significant. We find this value in statistical tables based on the sample size and the significance level \( \alpha \).
In our exercise, the critical value for a sample size of 18 at a 0.05 significance level is approximately ±0.444. We use both the positive and negative values because correlation can be either positive or negative.
Here's how it functions in practice:
  • If the absolute value of our correlation coefficient is larger than the absolute value of the critical value, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
  • If it is smaller, as seen in our example where 0.41 is less than 0.444, we do not have sufficient evidence, and the result is not statistically significant.
Understanding critical values helps us make informed judgments regarding the presence or absence of a true effect within the population we study.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is an essential component in hypothesis testing. It acts as the starting assumption that there is no effect or relationship in the context we are examining. For correlation tests, the null hypothesis typically states that there is no correlation between the two variables being studied.
Our exercise tested for a negative correlation with a correlation coefficient \( r = -0.41 \). Here, the null hypothesis would be that there is no negative correlation in the population.
To test this hypothesis, we calculate the correlation coefficient from our sample data and compare it to the critical value.
  • If the sample statistic exceeds the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis, suggesting significant evidence that a correlation does exist.
  • However, in our example, the correlation coefficient did not exceed the critical value. Thus, we failed to reject the null hypothesis, indicating insufficient evidence for a negative correlation in the population.
The null hypothesis plays a vital role in providing a benchmark for interpreting statistical tests. It allows researchers to draw conclusions about the presence or absence of effects based on calculated evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 9.66 and 9.67 refer to the regression line (given in Exercise 9.46 ): Cognition \(=102.3-3.34 \cdot\) Years using years playing football to predict the score on a cognition test. In each exercise, (a) Find the predicted cognition score for that case. (b) Two intervals are shown: one is a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean response and the other is a \(95 \%\) prediction interval for the response. Which is which? A person who has played football for 8 years. \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Interval I: }(22.7,128.5) & \text { Interval II: }(63.4,87.8)\end{array}\)

Show some computer output for fitting simple linear models. State the value of the sample slope for each model and give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the slope in the population is different from zero. Identify the p-value and use it (and a \(5 \%\) significance level) to make a clear conclusion about the effectiveness of the model.$$ \begin{array}{lrrrr} \text { Coefficients: } & \text { Estimate } & \text { Std.Error } & \mathrm{t} \text { value } & \operatorname{Pr}(>|\mathrm{t}|) \\ \text { (Intercept) } & 7.277 & 1.167 & 6.24 & 0.000 \\ \text { Dose } & -0.3560 & 0.2007 & -1.77 & 0.087 \end{array} $$

FIBER IN CEREALS AS A PREDICTOR OF CALORIES In Example 9.10 on page \(592,\) we look at a model to predict the number of calories in a cup of breakfast cereal using the number of grams of sugars. In Exercises 9.64 and 9.65 , we give computer output with two regression intervals and information about a specific amount of sugar. Interpret each of the intervals in the context of this data situation. (a) The \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean response (b) The \(95 \%\) prediction interval for the response The intervals given are for cereals with 16 grams of sugars: Sugars 95 \(\mathrm{P}\) \(\begin{array}{rrr}\text { rs Fit } & \text { SE Fit } \\\ 6 & 157.88 & 7.10 & \text { (143.3 }\end{array}\) \(95 \% \mathrm{Cl}\) 35,172.42) \(9 \%\) \(\begin{array}{lllll}16 & 15788 & 7.10 & (143.35,172.42) & (101.46\end{array}\) 214.31)

Test the correlation, as indicated. Show all details of the test. Test for evidence of a linear association; \(r=0.28 ; n=100\).

A random sample of 50 countries is stored in the dataset SampCountries. Two variables in the dataset are life expectancy (LifeExpectancy) and percentage of government expenditure spent on health care (Health) for each country. We are interested in whether or not the percent spent on health care can be used to effectively predict life expectancy. (a) What are the cases in this model? (b) Create a scatterplot with regression line and use it to determine whether we should have any serious concerns about the conditions being met for using a linear model with these data. (c) Run the simple linear regression, and report and interpret the slope. (d) Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the slope. (e) Is the percentage of government expenditure on health care a significant predictor of life expectancy? (f) The population slope (for all countries) is 0.467 . Is this captured in your \(95 \%\) CI from part (d)? (g) Find and interpret \(R^{2}\) for this linear model.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.