/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 45 The dataset ICUAdmissions, intro... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The dataset ICUAdmissions, introduced in Data 2.3 on page \(69,\) includes information on 200 patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit. One of the variables, Status, indicates whether each patient lived (indicated with a 0 ) or died (indicated with a 1 ). Use technology and the dataset to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of ICU patients who live.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution involves five steps: identifying the sample proportion, calculating the standard error, stating the confidence level, creating the confidence interval, and interpreting the results. The final answer will be a range (interval), representing the interval within which we can be 95% confident that the true population proportion lies.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the sample proportion

The first step is to identify the sample proportion: the number of patients who lived divided by the total number of patients. This is represented in general as \(\hat{p}=\frac{x}{n}\), where \(x\) is the number of successes (the number of patients who lived), and \(n\) is the total number of observations.
02

Calculate the standard error

The standard error is a measure of ground-level variation. This can be calculated using the formula for standard error of a proportion, which is \(\sqrt{\frac{{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}}{n}}\).
03

Choose the Confidence Level

In this problem, the specified confidence level is 95%. The Z score for a 95% confidence level is around 1.96.
04

Construct the confidence interval

Now you construct the confidence interval using the formula:\(\hat{p}\pm Z_{\alpha/2} \times \text{{Standard Error}}\). Hence the confidence interval will be \(\hat{p}\pm 1.96 \times \text{{Standard Error}}\). Here, \(Z_{\alpha/2}\) is the Z score (1.96 for a 95% confidence level).
05

Interpret the results

The 95% confidence interval means you can be 95% confident that the true proportion of ICU patients who live lies within the resulting interval. If the interval includes 0, it means the result is not statistically significant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion
A sample proportion, represented by \( \hat{p} \), is a key concept in statistics. It is the ratio of the number of successful outcomes to the total number of observations within a sample. In the context of the ICUAdmissions dataset, a successful outcome is defined as a patient who lived. To calculate the sample proportion, use the formula:
  • \( \hat{p} = \frac{x}{n} \)
  • where \(x\) is the number of patients who lived,
  • and \(n\) is the total number of patients in the sample, 200.
By determining this proportion, we gain a better understanding of the sample's characteristics. This statistic provides insight into the likelihood or frequency of a specific outcome occurring within the entire sample size. It's like checking a mini-version of the real world to get clues about how things might look across the full landscape.
Standard Error
Standard error is a crucial concept that helps measure the accuracy of a sample proportion. Essentially, it indicates how much the sample proportion is expected to fluctuate from the true population proportion due to the randomness inherent in sampling.The standard error of a sample proportion \( \hat{p} \) is given by the formula:
  • \( \text{SE} = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}} \)
  • where \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion,
  • and \(n\) is the total number of observations.
In simple terms, think of standard error as a measure of how spread out the sample proportion might be if we repeated the sampling multiple times under the same conditions. The smaller the standard error, the closer our sample proportion is likely to be to the true population proportion, providing a more reliable result. Consequently, knowing the standard error is essential for constructing a confidence interval that accurately reflects the variability and reliability of the sample data.
Z Score
The Z score is an important statistical tool used to understand how a particular result compares with a "normal" distribution. It tells you how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean. In the context of confidence intervals, the Z score represents the number of standard errors you need to include in your interval to achieve a certain level of confidence. For instance, in a 95% confidence interval, the Z score is approximately 1.96. This value signifies that we are capturing 95% of the standard normal distribution under the bell curve. The Z score helps us determine the range of values our confidence interval should span to ensure that it encompasses the true proportion a specified percentage of the time. Here's why it matters:
  • The higher the confidence level, the wider the interval, and consequently, the larger the Z score.
  • In our case, a Z score of 1.96 ensures we can confidently state our interval includes the true population proportion 95% of the time.
  • By multiplying this Z score by the standard error, we adjust our sample proportion range to reflect the desired confidence level.
This tool is central to making informed conclusions in hypothesis testing and confidence interval calculation, ensuring that our conclusions are statistically sound and reliable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As part of the same study described in Exercise 6.254 , the researchers also were interested in whether babies preferred singing or speech. Forty-eight of the original fifty infants were exposed to both singing and speech by the same woman. Interest was again measured by the amount of time the baby looked at the woman while she made noise. In this case the mean time while speaking was 66.97 with a standard deviation of \(43.42,\) and the mean for singing was 56.58 with a standard deviation of 31.57 seconds. The mean of the differences was 10.39 more seconds for the speaking treatment with a standard deviation of 55.37 seconds. Perform the appropriate test to determine if this is sufficient evidence to conclude that babies have a preference (either way) between speaking and singing.

In Exercise 6.93 on page \(430,\) we see that the average number of close confidants in a random sample of 2006 US adults is 2.2 with a standard deviation of \(1.4 .\) If we want to estimate the number of close confidants with a margin of error within ±0.05 and with \(99 \%\) confidence, how large a sample is needed?

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. To study the effect of sitting with a laptop computer on one's lap on scrotal temperature, 29 men have their scrotal temperature tested before and then after sitting with a laptop for one hour.

Do Hands Adapt to Water? Researchers in the UK designed a study to determine if skin wrinkled from submersion in water performed better at handling wet objects. \(^{62}\) They gathered 20 participants and had each move a set of wet objects and a set of dry objects before and after submerging their hands in water for 30 minutes (order of trials was randomized). The response is the time (seconds) it took to move the specific set of objects with wrinkled hands minus the time with unwrinkled hands. The mean difference for moving dry objects was 0.85 seconds with a standard deviation of 11.5 seconds. The mean difference for moving wet objects was -15.1 seconds with a standard deviation of 13.4 seconds. (a) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving dry objects. (b) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving wet objects.

Use the t-distribution and the given sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distributions are relatively normal. Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) using the sample results \(\bar{x}_{1}=56, s_{1}=8.2\) with \(n_{1}=30\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=51, s_{2}=6.9\) with \(n_{2}=40\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.