/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 106 In Exercise 6.93 on page \(430,\... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercise 6.93 on page \(430,\) we see that the average number of close confidants in a random sample of 2006 US adults is 2.2 with a standard deviation of \(1.4 .\) If we want to estimate the number of close confidants with a margin of error within ±0.05 and with \(99 \%\) confidence, how large a sample is needed?

Short Answer

Expert verified
After evaluating and rounding up, you will find you need a sample size of approximately 1237 people to obtain an estimate within the ±0.05 margin of error with a \(99\%\) confidence level.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Given Variables

The exercise provides the standard deviation (\(1.4\)), a desired margin of error (\(0.05\)), and a confidence level of \(99\% .\) Note that for a \(99\%\) confidence level, the Z-score (which can be found on the Z-table or standard normal distribution table) is \(2.576\).
02

Apply the Confidence Interval Formula

The formula we'll use to solve the exercise is the one for the sample size needed for a confidence interval, which is given as: \n Sample size \(n = \left( \frac{Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}} \cdot \sigma}{E} \right)^2 \). In this formula, \(Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\) is the Z-score, \(\sigma\) is the standard deviation and \(E\) is the margin of error.
03

Plug in the Given Values

We can substitute the provided data into the formula: \(n = \left( \frac{2.576 \cdot 1.4}{0.05} \right)^2\). This needs to be evaluated and the resulting number should be rounded up to the next whole number, because we can't work with fractions of a person.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
When researchers conduct studies, they're often interested in understanding a wider population based on a smaller group, or sample, taken from it. To estimate a population parameter like the average number of close confidants among US adults, instead of providing a single number, they give a range of numbers that they believe the actual average is likely to fall within. This range is known as a confidence interval, which gives both the estimated value and a sense of the precision of the estimate. The width of this interval depends on the desired confidence level and variability in the data. A 99% confidence interval is especially wide, implying that there's a high degree of certainty that the population parameter lies within that range. However, to maintain a small margin of error with such a high confidence level typically requires a larger sample size.

Margin of Error
The margin of error reflects the extent of uncertainty involved in the sample estimate. It is the maximum expected difference between the true population parameter and a sample estimate of that parameter. In other words, it tells us how close we can expect our sample statistic to be to the population value. A smaller margin of error indicates greater precision in the sample estimate but usually necessitates a larger sample size to achieve that precision. For example, being within ±0.05 of the true average number of close confidants means researchers can be quite certain that their sample provides an accurate estimate of the actual number, but as a trade-off, they’ll need to collect data from more individuals compared to a larger margin of error.
Standard Deviation
Variability in data is quantified using a measure called the standard deviation. It indicates how much individuals within a dataset deviate from the average or mean value. In the context of sample size determination, the standard deviation plays a crucial role as it affects the width of the confidence interval. A high standard deviation signifies that data points are spread out widely from the mean, potentially increasing the required sample size to achieve a specific margin of error. Conversely, a low standard deviation means data points are clustered closely around the mean, which may allow a smaller sample to still accurately estimate the population parameter with a given level of confidence. The known standard deviation of 1.4 in the close confidants example informs us about the variability in the number of confidants among US adults.
Z-score
The Z-score is a statistical measurement that describes a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values, measured in terms of standard deviations from the mean. For sample size determination, specifically when it's associated with a confidence interval, the Z-score corresponds to the desired confidence level. It tells us how many standard deviations an element is from the mean. To find the required Z-score for a specific confidence level, such as our 99%, statisticians typically use a Z-table. The Z-score of 2.576, for instance, indicates that the desired confidence level will include the mean plus or minus 2.576 standard deviations. This Z-score helps to scale the margin of error according to the level of confidence we wish to achieve, which in turn influences the calculation of the required sample size.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. To study the effect of women's tears on men, levels of testosterone are measured in 50 men after they sniff women's tears and after they sniff a salt solution. The order of the two treatments was randomized and the study was double-blind.

Use a t-distribution to find a confidence interval for the difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the relevant sample results from paired data. Give the best estimate for \(\mu_{1}-\) \(\mu_{2},\) the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from random samples from populations that are approximately normally distributed, and that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). A \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the paired difference sample results \(\bar{x}_{d}=556.9, s_{d}=\) \(143.6, n_{d}=100\)

Metal Tags on Penguins and Arrival Dates Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying a metal tag is detrimental to a penguin, as opposed to applying an electronic tag. One variable examined is the date penguins arrive at the breeding site, with later arrivals hurting breeding success. Arrival date is measured as the number of days after November \(1^{\text {st }}\). Mean arrival date for the 167 times metal-tagged penguins arrived was December \(7^{\text {th }}\left(37\right.\) days after November \(\left.1^{\text {st }}\right)\) with a standard deviation of 38.77 days, while mean arrival date for the 189 times electronic-tagged penguins arrived at the breeding site was November \(21^{\text {st }}(21\) days after November \(\left.1^{\text {st }}\right)\) with a standard deviation of \(27.50 .\) Do these data provide evidence that metal tagged penguins have a later mean arrival time? Show all details of the test.

We saw in Exercise 6.221 on page 466 that drinking tea appears to offer a strong boost to the immune system. In a study extending the results of the study described in that exercise, \(^{58}\) blood samples were taken on five participants before and after one week of drinking about five cups of tea a day (the participants did not drink tea before the study started). The before and after blood samples were exposed to e. coli bacteria, and production of interferon gamma, a molecule that fights bacteria, viruses, and tumors, was measured. Mean production went from \(155 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) before tea drinking to \(448 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) after tea drinking. The mean difference for the five subjects is \(293 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) with a standard deviation in the differences of \(242 .\) The paper implies that the use of the t-distribution is appropriate. (a) Why is it appropriate to use paired data in this analysis? (b) Find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean increase in production of interferon gamma after drinking tea for one week.

Find the endpoints of the t-distribution with \(5 \%\) beyond them in each tail if the samples have sizes \(n_{1}=8\) and \(n_{2}=10\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.