/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 In Exercises 6.1 to \(6.6,\) if ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercises 6.1 to \(6.6,\) if random samples of the given size are drawn from a population with the given proportion, find the standard error of the distribution of sample proportions. Samples of size 1000 from a population with proportion 0.70

Short Answer

Expert verified
After the calculations, one will find the standard error of the distribution of sample proportions.

Step by step solution

01

Identify given values

From the exercise, we identify the given values as follows: the sample size (\(n\)) is 1000 and the population proportion (\(p\)) is 0.70.
02

Use the formula to calculate standard error

We substitute the given values into the standard error formula like this: \[SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.70(1-0.70)}{1000}}\]
03

Simplification and Final answer

On simplifying, we find the value of standard error. This simplification involves multiplication and division followed by square root operation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standard Error
The standard error is a measure of how much sample proportions will vary from the true population proportion. It provides an idea of the spread of all possible sample proportions. The standard error is crucial when it comes to understanding the precision of an estimate. It gives us insight into how close our sample proportion is likely to be to the actual population proportion. This is especially important when making inferences about a population based on a sample.

To calculate the standard error of the sample proportions, we can use the following formula:

\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} \]

Where:
* \( p \) is the population proportion
* \( n \) is the sample size

This formula essentially computes the spread or variability of the sample proportions. A smaller standard error indicates that the sample proportion is relatively close to the true population proportion.
Population Proportion
Population proportion is a parameter that represents the fraction of the population that possesses a certain characteristic or attribute. It is denoted by \( p \) and is considered a fixed number because it refers to the whole population. Understanding the population proportion helps us to estimate the likelihood of a certain trait or outcome being present in a larger group, based on observations from a smaller sample.

For example, if the population proportion is 0.70, it means 70% of the population exhibits the trait in question. This information is fundamental in calculating probabilities and making predictions about real-world conditions based on sample data.

When you draw a sample and calculate its proportion, you are attempting to estimate this population proportion. The accuracy of this estimate is often reflected in the standard error, which tells us how much the sample proportion might differ from \( p \).
Sample Size
Sample size, denoted as \( n \), is the number of observations or individuals included in a sample drawn from the larger population. It plays a critical role in statistical analysis and directly affects the reliability and accuracy of sample estimates.

Larger sample sizes tend to provide more reliable and precise estimates of the population proportion. This is because, as the sample size increases, the standard error decreases, suggesting less variability in the sample estimates. In other words:

  • Large sample size = more accuracy
  • Smaller standard error = closer approximation to the population proportion

The choice of sample size is balanced with practical considerations, such as the cost and feasibility of data collection. However, for more accurate and generalizable results, larger sample sizes are often preferred. This is particularly important when attempting to detect differences or make significant predictions based on sample data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume the samples are random samples from distributions that are reasonably normally distributed, and that a t-statistic will be used for inference about the difference in sample means. State the degrees of freedom used. Find the endpoints of the t-distribution with \(2.5 \%\) beyond them in each tail if the samples have sizes \(n_{1}=15\) and \(n_{2}=25\).

Do Hands Adapt to Water? Researchers in the UK designed a study to determine if skin wrinkled from submersion in water performed better at handling wet objects. \(^{62}\) They gathered 20 participants and had each move a set of wet objects and a set of dry objects before and after submerging their hands in water for 30 minutes (order of trials was randomized). The response is the time (seconds) it took to move the specific set of objects with wrinkled hands minus the time with unwrinkled hands. The mean difference for moving dry objects was 0.85 seconds with a standard deviation of 11.5 seconds. The mean difference for moving wet objects was -15.1 seconds with a standard deviation of 13.4 seconds. (a) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving dry objects. (b) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving wet objects.

Split the Bill? Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The data in SplitBill includes the cost of what each person ordered (in Israeli shekels) and the payment method (Individual or Split). Some summary statistics are provided in Table 6.20 and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to test (at a \(5 \%\) level ) if there is evidence that the mean cost is higher when people split the bill. You may have done this test using randomizations in Exercise 4.118 on page 302 .

Using Data 5.1 on page \(375,\) we find a significant difference in the proportion of fruit flies surviving after 13 days between those eating organic potatoes and those eating conventional (not organic) potatoes. ask you to conduct a hypothesis test using additional data from this study. \(^{40}\) In every case, we are testing $$\begin{array}{ll}H_{0}: & p_{o}=p_{c} \\\H_{a}: & p_{o}>p_{c}\end{array}$$ where \(p_{o}\) and \(p_{c}\) represent the proportion of fruit flies alive at the end of the given time frame of those eating organic food and those eating conventional food, respectively. Also, in every case, we have \(n_{1}=n_{2}=500 .\) Show all remaining details in the test, using a \(5 \%\) significance level. Effect of Organic Bananas after 15 Days After 15 days, 345 of the 500 fruit flies eating organic bananas are still alive, while 320 of the 500 eating conventional bananas are still alive.

Metal Tags on Penguins and Arrival Dates Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying a metal tag is detrimental to a penguin, as opposed to applying an electronic tag. One variable examined is the date penguins arrive at the breeding site, with later arrivals hurting breeding success. Arrival date is measured as the number of days after November \(1^{\text {st }}\). Mean arrival date for the 167 times metal-tagged penguins arrived was December \(7^{\text {th }}\left(37\right.\) days after November \(\left.1^{\text {st }}\right)\) with a standard deviation of 38.77 days, while mean arrival date for the 189 times electronic-tagged penguins arrived at the breeding site was November \(21^{\text {st }}(21\) days after November \(\left.1^{\text {st }}\right)\) with a standard deviation of \(27.50 .\) Do these data provide evidence that metal tagged penguins have a later mean arrival time? Show all details of the test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.