/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Effect of Organic Soybeans after... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Effect of Organic Soybeans after 8 Days After 8 days, the proportion of fruit flies eating organic soybeans still alive is \(0.79,\) while the proportion still alive eating conventional soybeans is 0.32 . The standard error for the difference in proportions is 0.031 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference in the proportions of fruit flies still alive after eating the two types of soybeans is \(0.47\). The standard error of this difference is \(0.031\).

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Proportions

Identify the provided proportions: proportion for organic soybeans is \(0.79\) and for conventional soybeans is \(0.32\).
02

Calculate the Difference in Proportions

Find the difference between the proportions. Here, it means subtracting the proportion for conventional from the one for organic soybeans: \(0.79 - 0.32\). The difference is \(0.47\).
03

Utilize the Standard Error

The standard error for the difference in proportions is given as \(0.031\). This can be used to calculate a confidence interval or perform a statistical test to verify whether the difference is statistically significant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportions
Proportions are a way to express the size of a part in relation to a whole. In this study, we look at the proportion of fruit flies remaining alive after feeding on different types of soybeans. To calculate the proportion, you divide the part by the whole. For example, if out of 100 fruit flies, 79 are still alive after feeding on organic soybeans, the proportion of surviving flies is 0.79. In contrast, for conventional soybeans, if 32 out of 100 flies survive, the proportion is 0.32.

Understanding proportions is crucial because they help compare different groups and identify differences or similarities. They allow us to see the potential impact of different diets on the survival rates of fruit flies. Such comparisons can highlight significant effects that require further investigation.
Standard Error
The standard error measures the accuracy of a sample proportion when trying to estimate a population proportion. It helps us understand the variability or error in the sample used for our analysis. In the context of the exercise, a standard error of 0.031 is associated with the difference between the proportions of fruit flies surviving with different soybeans. This small standard error suggests a relatively precise estimate.

To compute the standard error for differences in proportions, you often need to know the sample sizes and the individual proportions. The standard error gives us a way to gauge how much the sample result might vary if the study were repeated. A smaller standard error indicates less variability and more confidence in the observed results as an estimate of the true difference.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain a population parameter, like a proportion difference, with a certain level of confidence, commonly 95%. In this example, you can use the standard error to determine the confidence interval for the difference in proportions between organic and conventional soybean-fed fruit flies.

The confidence interval calculation uses the difference in proportions (0.47) and the standard error (0.031). A common approach is to multiply the standard error by a critical value (often 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval) and add/subtract it from the estimated difference:
  • Confidence Interval = Difference ± (Critical Value × Standard Error)
Thus, the interval provides a range, reflecting the uncertainty of the difference's true value. It helps us understand how much the difference might vary, supporting better decisions based on the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the indicated confidence interval. Assume the standard error comes from a bootstrap distribution that is approximately normally distributed. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for a difference in proportions \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) if the samples have \(n_{1}=50\) with \(\hat{p}_{1}=0.68\) and \(n_{2}=80\) with \(\hat{p}_{2}=0.61,\) and the standard error is \(S E=0.085\).

Predicting Price of Used Mustangs from Miles Driven Data 3.4 on page 246 describes a sample of \(n=25\) Mustang cars being offered for sale on the Internet. The data are stored in MustangPrice, and we want to predict the Price of each car (in \(\$ 1000 \mathrm{~s}\) ) based on the Miles it has been driven (also in \(1000 \mathrm{~s}\) ). (a) Find the slope of the regression line for predicting Price based on Miles for these data. (b) Estimate the standard error of the slope using a bootstrap distribution and use it and the normal distribution to find a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for the slope of this relationship in the population of all Mustangs for sale on the Internet.

Find the indicated confidence interval. Assume the standard error comes from a bootstrap distribution that is approximately normally distributed. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for a difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) if the samples have \(n_{1}=100\) with \(\bar{x}_{1}=256\) and \(s_{1}=51\) and \(n_{2}=120\) with \(\bar{x}_{2}=242\) and \(s_{2}=47,\) and the standard error is \(S E=6.70 .\)

Penalty Shots in World Cup Soccer A study \(^{11}\) of 138 penalty shots in World Cup Finals games between 1982 and 1994 found that the goalkeeper correctly guessed the direction of the kick only \(41 \%\) of the time. The article notes that this is "slightly worse than random chance." We use these data as a sample of all World Cup penalty shots ever. Test at a \(5 \%\) significance level to see whether there is evidence that the percent guessed correctly is less than \(50 \%\). The sample size is large enough to use the normal distribution. The standard error from a randomization distribution under the null hypothesis is \(S E=0.043 .\)

How Often Do You Use Cash? In a survey \(^{13}\) of 1000 American adults conducted in April 2012 . \(43 \%\) reported having gone through an entire week without paying for anything in cash. Test to see if this sample provides evidence that the proportion of all American adults going a week without paying cash is greater than \(40 \%\). Use the fact that a randomization distribution is approximately normally distributed with a standard error of \(S E=0.016 .\) Show all details of the test and use a \(5 \%\) significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.