/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 60 Give null and alternative hypoth... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p<0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=38 / 100=0.38\) with \(n=100\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null and alternative hypotheses are \(H_{0}: p = 0.5\) and \(H_{a}: p < 0.5\) respectively. The sample data provides a sample proportion of \(\hat{p}=38/100 = 0.38\) based on a sample size \(n=100\). This data can be used on statistical software like StatKey to generate a random distribution and compute the p-value.

Step by step solution

01

Hypothesis Formulation

The null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) posits that the population proportion \(p = 0.5\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) suggests that the population proportion \(p < 0.5\). It's essential to remember that the null hypothesis often includes an equals sign.
02

Sample Data Interpretation

Our sample proportion is given by \(\hat{p}=38/100 = 0.38\). This is based on a sample size \(n=100\). The sample implies that in 100 trials, the predicted scenario occurred 38 times.
03

Use of Statistical Software

With our hypotheses and sample data, we can now use StatKey or compatible software to conduct our tests. Select 'Test for a Single Proportion' then 'Edit Data' where you insert your sample data.
04

Calculation of p-value

Using the software, generate a random distribution. The p-value can be subsequently calculated. The p-value is the chance of obtaining our observed sample data (or more extreme) assuming that the null hypothesis is true. It measures the strength of evidence in support of a null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Understanding null and alternative hypotheses is a cornerstone of hypothesis testing. In any experimental setup, a null hypothesis (\(H_{0}\)) is a statement that there is no effect or no difference, and it specifies a population proportion that we assume to be true before collecting any data. In contrast, the alternative hypothesis (\(H_{a}\) or \(H_{1}\) ) is a statement that indicates what we suspect might be true instead.

Using the example from the exercise, the null hypothesis is \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) suggesting no difference from the expected value. The alternative hypothesis, \(H_{a}: p<0.5\) in this case, suggests that the actual population proportion is less than what we initially believed. Accurately formulating these hypotheses is essential for analyzing the direction and the robustness of the evidence provided by the sample data.
Population Proportion
The term population proportion, denoted by \(p\) indicates the likelihood of a particular outcome within a population. In hypothesis testing, we use the sample proportion (\(\hat{p}\) as an estimate of the true population proportion based on the sample data. The sample proportion is calculated by dividing the number of times the event of interest occurs by the total number of trials.

In the context of the textbook exercise, the sample proportion was calculated to be \(\hat{p}=38/100=0.38\) from a sample size of 100. This estimate plays a pivotal role in testing our hypotheses and determining the statistical significance of our findings.
P-value Calculation
P-value calculation is a crucial step in hypothesis testing that quantifies the evidence against the null hypothesis. The p-value is the probability of observing a sample statistic as extreme or more extreme than the one calculated from the sample data, given that the null hypothesis is true.

The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis. A commonly used threshold for significance is \(p < 0.05\) which indicates that if the null hypothesis were true, there would be less than a 5% chance of observing a result as extreme as the sample data. Calculating the p-value allows researchers to make an informed decision on whether to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
StatKey Software
To streamline the process of hypothesis testing, tools like StatKey software are invaluable. StatKey is designed to conduct statistical tests, including hypothesis testing for a single proportion, and create the relevant distributions for analysis. The user-friendly interface allows for easy entry of sample data, and it automates the randomization process and the calculation of the p-value.

Following the steps in the provided exercise, StatKey simplifies these processes by allowing the user to input their sample information directly and obtain results that guide decision-making in statistical testing. By promptly generating a randomization distribution and the associated p-value, the software aids in substantiating the statistical reasoning.
Randomization Distribution
A randomization distribution is a representation of what the distribution of a sample statistic (like a sample proportion) would look like, assuming the null hypothesis were true. This distribution is generated by randomly reassigning outcomes among the observations in the sample and calculating the statistic for many randomized samples.

The central purpose of observing a randomization distribution is to determine how unusual the observed statistic is. The extremity of the sample data is assessed in the context of the distribution, which culminates in the calculation of the p-value. By comparing the sample statistic to this distribution, we essentially determine the likelihood of obtaining our sample or more extreme results, should the null hypothesis hold true. The randomization test is a non-parametric method of hypothesis testing which does not rely on underlying population distributions, making it versatile and robust for a range of data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Using the complete voting records of a county to see if there is evidence that more than \(50 \%\) of the eligible voters in the county voted in the last election.

Indicate whether it is best assessed by using a confidence interval or a hypothesis test or whether statistical inference is not relevant to answer it. (a) What proportion of people using a public restroom wash their hands after going to the bathroom? (b) On average, how much more do adults who played sports in high school exercise than adults who did not play sports in high school? (c) In \(2010,\) what percent of the US Senate voted to confirm Elena Kagan as a member of the Supreme Court? (d) What is the average daily calorie intake of 20 year-old males?

Testing 50 people in a driving simulator to find the average reaction time to hit the brakes when an object is seen in the view ahead.

Data 4.3 on page 265 introduces a situation in which a restaurant chain is measuring the levels of arsenic in chicken from its suppliers. The question is whether there is evidence that the mean level of arsenic is greater than \(80 \mathrm{ppb},\) so we are testing \(H_{0}: \mu=80\) vs \(H_{a}:\) \(\mu>80,\) where \(\mu\) represents the average level of arsenic in all chicken from a certain supplier. It takes money and time to test for arsenic, so samples are often small. Suppose \(n=6\) chickens from one supplier are tested, and the levels of arsenic (in ppb) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}68, & 75, & 81, & 93, & 95, & 134\end{array}\) (a) What is the sample mean for the data? (b) Translate the original sample data by the appropriate amount to create a new dataset in which the null hypothesis is true. How do the sample size and standard deviation of this new dataset compare to the sample size and standard deviation of the original dataset? (c) Write the six new data values from part (b) on six cards. Sample from these cards with replacement to generate one randomization sample. (Select a card at random, record the value, put it back, select another at random, until you have a sample of size \(6,\) to match the original sample size.) List the values in the sample and give the sample mean. (d) Generate 9 more simulated samples, for a total of 10 samples for a randomization distribution. Give the sample mean in each case and create a small dotplot. Use an arrow to locate the original sample mean on your dotplot.

4.150 Approval from the FDA for Antidepressants The FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) is responsible for approving all new drugs sold in the US. In order to approve a new drug for use as an antidepressant, the FDA requires two results from randomized double-blind experiments showing the drug is more effective than a placebo at a \(5 \%\) level. The FDA does not put a limit on the number of times a drug company can try such experiments. Explain, using the problem of multiple tests, why the FDA might want to rethink its guidelines. 4.151 Does Massage Really Help Reduce Inflammation in Muscles? In Exercise 4.112 on page \(301,\) we learn that massage helps reduce levels of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in muscles when muscle tissue is tested 2.5 hours after massage. The results were significant at the \(5 \%\) level. However, the authors of the study actually performed 42 different tests: They tested for significance with 21 different compounds in muscles and at two different times (right after the massage and 2.5 hours after). (a) Given this new information, should we have less confidence in the one result described in the earlier exercise? Why? (b) Sixteen of the tests done by the authors involved measuring the effects of massage on muscle metabolites. None of these tests were significant. Do you think massage affects muscle metabolites? (c) Eight of the tests done by the authors (including the one described in the earlier exercise) involved measuring the effects of massage on inflammation in the muscle. Four of these tests were significant. Do you think it is safe to conclude that massage really does reduce inflammation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.