/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 A taste test is conducted betwee... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A taste test is conducted between two brands of diet cola, Brand \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{Brand} \mathrm{B},\) to determine if there is evidence that more people prefer Brand A. A total of 100 people participate in the taste test. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Give an example of possible sample results that would provide strong evidence that more people prefer Brand A. (Give your results as number choosing Brand \(\mathrm{A}\) and number choosing Brand B.) (c) Give an example of possible sample results that would provide no evidence to support the claim that more people prefer Brand \(\mathrm{A}\). (d) Give an example of possible sample results for which the results would be inconclusive: the sample provides some evidence that Brand \(\mathrm{A}\) is preferred but the evidence is not strong.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this example, the null hypothesis is that there is no preference between Brands A and B (50% of people like each brand). The alternative hypothesis is that more than 50% of people like Brand A. Strong support for Brand A would be shown with, for example, 80 out of 100 taste testers preferring Brand A. No support would be shown by an even split (50 for Brand A, 50 for Brand B). Inconclusive results might occur if 60 prefer Brand A and 40 prefer Brand B.

Step by step solution

01

- Define the parameter and state the null and alternative hypotheses

Parameter: \( p_A \), the proportion of all people who prefer Brand A over Brand B. \[ \] Null Hypothesis, \( H_0 \): \( p_A = 0.5 \). This means that 50% of people prefer Brand A, implying no preference between the two brands. \[ \] Alternative Hypothesis, \( H_A \): \( p_A > 0.5 \). This means that more than 50% of people prefer Brand A, implying preference for Brand A.
02

- Give example for strong evidence supporting alternative hypothesis

Assume that of the 100 people who took part in the taste test, 80 chose Brand A and 20 chose Brand B. Here, the proportion who prefer Brand A, which is 0.8 (80/100), is substantially more than 0.5, providing strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
03

- Give example for no evidence supporting alternative hypothesis

Assume that of the 100 people who took part in the taste test, 50 chose Brand A and 50 chose Brand B. Here, the proportion who prefer Brand A and Brand B, both are 0.5 (50/100), which supports the null hypothesis and provides no evidence of preference for Brand A.
04

- Give example for inconclusive results

Assume that of the 100 people who took part in the taste test, 60 chose Brand A and 40 chose Brand B. Here, the proportion who prefer Brand A, which is 0.6, is more than 0.5 but not significantly more to draw a clear conclusion. Therefore, the results are inconclusive and provide some evidence but not strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Taste Test
A taste test is a fun and practical way to gather feedback on different products, like sodas, ice creams, or any other consumables. It involves participants trying two or more versions of a product and choosing their favorite. This type of test helps companies understand consumer preferences, which can inform product development and marketing strategies.
For a taste test to be effective, it usually needs a good number of participants to ensure reliable results. In our example, 100 people participated, which is a fairly robust sample size. This allows for meaningful analysis of the preferences between two diet colas: Brand A and Brand B.
Understanding how people make choices in a taste test helps us set up hypotheses based on their preferences, which leads us to hypothesis testing. Analyzing results from a taste test can tell us whether consumers have a significant preference for one product over another. This understanding is crucial for businesses to make informed decisions.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a foundational concept in statistics, especially relevant in hypothesis testing. It is a statement that there is no effect or no difference, and it forms the basis of many statistical tests.
In the context of our taste test, the null hypothesis (often denoted as \( H_0 \)) is that there is no preference between the two brands of diet cola. Mathematically, this is expressed as \( p_A = 0.5 \), meaning exactly 50% of the participants would prefer Brand A, assuming no bias or preference exists.
It's important to start with this assumption because it allows us to use statistical methods to test whether there's enough evidence to reject it. In hypothesis testing, we either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on our analysis. The null hypothesis is critical because it reflects a baseline expectation, helping to evaluate changes or differences in the observed data.
Proportion Analysis
Proportion analysis helps us understand and interpret the results of categorical data, especially when looking at preferences or counts in experiments like taste tests. It involves comparing proportions, or percentages, to determine if one group is preferred over another.
In our example, we're analyzing the proportion of participants who selected Brand A over Brand B. The parameter we're interested in is \( p_A \), the proportion who prefer Brand A. The analysis revolves around comparing this proportion to 0.5, which represents no preference.
When calculating proportions, we divide the number of people who chose a particular option by the total number of participants. In a taste test:
  • Strong evidence for a preference is observed if the proportion is significantly greater than 0.5 (e.g., 80 out of 100 choose Brand A, giving a proportion of 0.8).
  • No evidence for preference happens when the proportion equals 0.5 (e.g., 50 for each brand).
  • Inconclusive evidence occurs when the proportion is slightly more than 0.5 but not enough to rule out sampling variability (e.g., 60 out of 100 choose Brand A, proportion is 0.6).
Understanding proportion analysis is essential as it informs whether we can confidently claim one product is favored, influencing evidence-based decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu=15\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 15\) (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 13.9\) to 16.2 (b) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 12.7\) to 14.8 (c) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 13.5\) to 16.5

Euchre One of the authors and some statistician friends have an ongoing series of Euchre games that will stop when one of the two teams is deemed to be statistically significantly better than the other team. Euchre is a card game and each game results in a win for one team and a loss for the other. Only two teams are competing in this series, which we'll call team A and team B. (a) Define the parameter(s) of interest. (b) What are the null and alternative hypotheses if the goal is to determine if either team is statistically significantly better than the other at winning Euchre? (c) What sample statistic(s) would they need to measure as the games go on? (d) Could the winner be determined after one or two games? Why or why not? (e) Which significance level, \(5 \%\) or \(1 \%,\) will make the game last longer?

Mating Choice and Offspring Fitness Does the ability to choose a mate improve offspring fitness in fruit flies? Researchers have studied this by taking female fruit flies and randomly dividing them into two groups; one group is put into a cage with a large number of males and able to freely choose who to mate with, while flies in the other group are each put into individual vials, each with only one male, giving no choice in who to mate with. Females are then put into egg laying chambers, and a certain number of larvae collected. Do the larvae from the mate choice group exhibit higher survival rates? A study \(^{44}\) published in Nature found that mate choice does increase offspring fitness in fruit flies (with p-value \(<0.02\) ), yet this result went against conventional wisdom in genetics and was quite controversial. Researchers attempted to replicate this result with a series of related experiments, \({ }^{45}\) with data provided in MateChoice. (a) In the first replication experiment, using the same species of fruit fly as the original Nature study, 6067 of the 10000 larvae from the mate choice group survived and 5976 of the 10000 larvae from the no mate choice group survived. Calculate the p-value. (b) Using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and \(\mathrm{p}\) -value from (a), state the conclusion in context. (c) Actually, the 10,000 larvae in each group came from a series of 50 different runs of the experiment, with 200 larvae in each group for each run. The researchers believe that conditions dif- fer from run to run, and thus it makes sense to treat each \(\mathrm{run}\) as a case (rather than each fly). In this analysis, we are looking at paired data, and the response variable would be the difference in the number of larvae surviving between the choice group and the no choice group, for each of the 50 runs. The counts (Choice and NoChoice and difference (Choice \(-\) NoChoice) in number of surviving larva are stored in MateChoice. Using the single variable of differences, calculate the p-value for testing whether the average difference is greater than \(0 .\) (Hint: this is a single quantitative variable, so the corresponding test would be for a single mean.) (d) Using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and the p-value from (c), state the conclusion in context. (e) The experiment being tested in parts (a)-(d) was designed to mimic the experiment from the original study, yet the original study yielded significant results while this study did not. If mate choice really does improve offspring fitness in fruit flies, did the follow-up study being analyzed in parts (a)-(d) make a Type I, Type II, or no error? (f) If mate choice really does not improve offspring fitness in fruit flies, did the original Nature study make a Type I, Type II, or no error?

You roll a die 60 times and record the sample proportion of 5 's, and you want to test whether the die is biased to give more 5 's than a fair die would ordinarily give. To find the p-value for your sample data, you create a randomization distribution of proportions of 5 's in many simulated samples of size 60 with a fair die. (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Where will the center of the distribution be? Why? (c) Give an example of a sample proportion for which the number of 5 's obtained is less than what you would expect in a fair die. (d) Will your answer to part (c) lie on the left or the right of the center of the randomization distribution? (e) To find the p-value for your answer to part (c), would you look at the left, right, or both tails? (f) For your answer in part (c), can you say anything about the size of the p-value?

Interpreting a P-value In each case, indicate whether the statement is a proper interpretation of what a p-value measures. (a) The probability the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (b) The probability that the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is true. (c) The probability of seeing data as extreme as the sample, when the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (d) The probability of making a Type I error if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (e) The probability of making a Type II error if the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is true.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.