/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 A situation is described for a s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A situation is described for a statistical test. In each case, define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. Testing to see if there is evidence that a correlation between height and salary is significant (that is, different than zero ).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The relevant parameters are height and salary. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no correlation between height and salary (\( \rho = 0 \)). The alternative hypothesis (H1) is that the correlation between height and salary is significantly different than zero (\( \rho \neq 0 \)).

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Parameters

The parameters in this case study are height and salary. They both constitute a correlation relationship.
02

Setting up the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (H0) is often a statement of no effect or no relationship. So in this case, the null hypothesis would be: There is no correlation between height and salary, which translates to a correlation coefficient of 0.
03

Setting up the Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis (H1) is the statement that directly contradicts the null hypothesis. What we want to prove is that a correlation between height and salary exists (meaning the correlation is significantly different than zero). Hence, the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a non-zero correlation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In any statistical analysis, the null hypothesis is critical as it is the claim being tested. The null hypothesis asserts that there is no association or effect between the variables of interest. In the context of the correlation between height and salary, the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) posits that the correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of this relationship, is equal to zero. This means there is no evidence to suggest any relationship between height and salary in the population.

It's like a base assumption that we start with, and our objective in hypothesis testing is to challenge this assumption. It places the burden of proof on those who claim that a relationship exists, requiring them to demonstrate this with sufficient evidence from data. Setting up a clear null hypothesis is crucial for a strong foundation in any statistical test.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (\( H_1 \) or (\( H_a \)) serves as the counter-claim to the null hypothesis. It's what you suspect might be true and are seeking evidence to support. In the scenario where we're investigating a relationship between height and salary, the alternative hypothesis posits that there exists a non-zero correlation: essentially, height does have some effect on salary.

This hypothesis doesn't necessarily specify whether the effect is positive or negative, only that there's some statistically significant relationship to be observed. The alternative hypothesis fosters the investigative nature of statistical testing, where we're set to either reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative or fail to find enough evidence to do so.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, where 1 represents a perfect positive correlation, 0 represents no correlation, and -1 represents a perfect negative correlation.

This coefficient is the crux of our statistical test in the given exercise. If it significantly deviates from zero (in either a positive or negative direction), it suggests that as one variable increases, the other variable also tends to increase (or decrease, if the correlation is negative). It's this value that is tested against the null hypothesis when we assess the significance of the relationship between height and salary.
Parameters in Statistics
Parameters in statistics refer to the defining characteristics or measurable factors of a population that help in concluding from sampled data. For example, the mean of a population is a parameter that summarizes the average value of that population.

In the exercise at hand, height and salary are the key parameters as they define the aspects of the population we're examining for a correlation. Identifying the correct parameters is essential in setting up the hypotheses and conducting an accurate test. In practice, we often estimate parameters through a statistic, a measure computed from sample data, since having data for an entire population is rarely possible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Approval Rating for Congress In a Gallup poll \(^{51}\) conducted in December 2015 , a random sample of \(n=824\) American adults were asked "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job?" The proportion who said they approve is \(\hat{p}=0.13,\) and a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for Congressional job approval is 0.107 to 0.153 . If we use a 5\% significance level, what is the conclusion if we are: (a) Testing to see if there is evidence that the job approval rating is different than \(14 \%\). (This happens to be the average sample approval rating from the six months prior to this poll.) (b) Testing to see if there is evidence that the job approval rating is different than \(9 \%\). (This happens to be the lowest sample Congressional approval rating Gallup ever recorded through the time of the poll.)

In a test to see whether males, on average, have bigger noses than females, the study indicates that " \(p<0.01\)."

Figure 4.25 shows a scatterplot of the acidity (pH) for a sample of \(n=53\) Florida lakes vs the average mercury level (ppm) found in fish taken from each lake. The full dataset is introduced in Data 2.4 on page 71 and is available in FloridaLakes. There appears to be a negative trend in the scatterplot, and we wish to test whether there is significant evidence of a negative association between \(\mathrm{pH}\) and mercury levels. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) For these data, a statistical software package produces the following output: $$ r=-0.575 \quad p \text { -value }=0.000017 $$ Use the p-value to give the conclusion of the test. Include an assessment of the strength of the evidence and state your result in terms of rejecting or failing to reject \(H_{0}\) and in terms of \(\mathrm{pH}\) and mercury. (c) Is this convincing evidence that low \(\mathrm{pH}\) causes the average mercury level in fish to increase? Why or why not?

Data 4.2 on page 263 describes a study of a possible relationship between the perceived malevolence of a team's uniforms and penalties called against the team. In Example 4.36 on page 326 we construct a randomization distribution to test whether there is evidence of a positive correlation between these two variables for NFL teams. The data in MalevolentUniformsNHL has information on uniform malevolence and penalty minutes (standardized as \(z\) -scores) for National Hockey League (NHL) teams. Use StatKey or other technology to perform a test similar to the one in Example 4.36 using the NHL hockey data. Use a \(5 \%\) significance level and be sure to show all details of the test.

Polling 1000 people in a large community to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater then \(10 \%\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.