/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 182 Exercise 2.143 on page 102 intro... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercise 2.143 on page 102 introduces a study that examines the association between playing football. brain size as measured by left hippocampal volume (in \(\mu \mathrm{L}\) ), and percentile on a cognitive reaction test. Figure 2.56 gives two scatterplots. Both have number of years playing football as the explanatory variable while Graph (a) has cognitive percentile as the response variable and Graph (b) has hippocampal volume as the response variable. (a) The two corresponding correlations are -0.465 and \(-0.366 .\) Which correlation goes with which scatterplot? (b) Both correlations are negative. Interpret what this means in terms of football, brain size, and cognitive percentile.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For graph (a) and (b), the correlations are \(-0.465\) and \(-0.366\) respectively. The negative correlation indicates that with an increase in the number of years playing football, both the cognitive percentile and hippocampal volume decrease.

Step by step solution

01

Match Correlations to Scatterplots

To recognize which correlation belongs to each scatterplot, we need to understand that a more negative correlation means a stronger negative relationship between the variables. Graph (a) pairs football years with cognitive percentile, and Graph (b) pairs football years with hippocampal volume. The correlation of \(-0.465\) is more negative than \(-0.366\), hence it indicates a stronger negative relationship. We need to examine both graphs to identify which one shows a stronger negative relationship.
02

Interpret Negative Correlation

Negative correlation implies that as one variable increases, the other decreases. Here, both correlations are negative, meaning that as the number of years playing football increases, both cognitive percentile and hippocampal volume decrease. However, we can’t infer causation from correlation. It doesn’t necessarily mean football causes these decreases, there could be confounding variables.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Negative Correlation
In statistics, a negative correlation between two variables indicates an inverse relationship. This means that as one variable increases, the other tends to decrease. In the context of the exercise, the two negative correlations noted are between years of playing football and two separate outcomes: cognitive percentile and hippocampal volume.

For example, a correlation of \(-0.465\) suggests that as the number of years playing football increases, the cognitive percentile generally decreases. Similarly, a correlation of \(-0.366\) implies that a longer football career might be associated with a lower hippocampal volume. These numbers tell us the direction and strength of the relationship, with \(-0.465\) showing a stronger negative correlation than \(-0.366\).

Understanding that correlation does not imply causation is crucial here. The negative correlation merely suggests a tendency but not a direct cause-and-effect relationship. Other factors could be contributing to this observation. Exploring potential confounding variables—like age, overall health, or training intensity—could provide further insights.
Scatterplot Analysis
Scatterplots are a powerful visual tool used in statistics to examine the relationship between two variables. Each point on a scatterplot represents an observation with its coordinates determined by the two variables being analyzed. In the context of the exercise, scatterplots were used to display relationships between years of football played (explanatory variable) against cognitive performance and brain volume (response variables).

By examining scatterplots, we can visually assess the trend of the data points. When talking about a negative correlation, we often see a downward trend from left to right on the graph. In this exercise, reviewing the scatterplots allows us to identify where the correlation is more negatively inclined by spotting the steeper downward trend, which aligns with the more negative correlation value.

Utilizing scatterplot analysis to see the trend helps to intuitively understand complex statistical relationships. It provides a way to visually detect outliers or any peculiar data patterns that could influence the results, which are not always obvious in numerical data alone.
Cognitive Performance
Cognitive performance refers to the ability to perform various mental tasks, such as memory, attention, and problem-solving. It's often measured by standardized tests that provide scores in percentiles, indicating how an individual’s abilities compare to a broader population. In this exercise, cognitive performance was one of the outcomes related to years of playing football.

The negative correlation between years of playing football and cognitive percentile suggests that longer football exposure may be associated with lower scores in cognitive tests. However, this does not outright signal a decline in cognitive abilities solely due to football. It is important to consider how activities and lifestyle choices or even measurement errors might influence these scores.

Keeping an eye on different studies involving sports and cognitive outcomes is essential to understand the broader implications. Cognitive performance is influenced by many factors, including education, health conditions, and socioeconomic status, which should all be considered when interpreting findings from correlation studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Runs and Wins in Baseball In Exercise 2.150 on page \(104,\) we looked at the relationship between total hits by team in the 2014 season and division (NL or AL) in baseball. Two other variables in the BaseballHits dataset are the number of wins and the number of runs scored during the season. The dataset consists of values for each variable from all 30 MLB teams. From these data we calculate the regression line: \(\widehat{\text { Wins }}=34.85+0.070(\) Runs \()\) (a) Which is the explanatory and which is the response variable in this regression line? (b) Interpret the intercept and slope in context. (c) The San Francisco Giants won 88 games while scoring 665 runs in 2014. Predict the number of games won by San Francisco using the regression line. Calculate the residual. Were the Giants efficient at winning games with 665 runs?

Indicate whether the five number summary corresponds most likely to a distribution that is skewed to the left, skewed to the right, or symmetric. (15,25,30,35,45)

Fiber in the Diet The number of grams of fiber eaten in one day for a sample of ten people are \(\begin{array}{ll}10 & 11\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{ll}11 & 14\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllll}15 & 17 & 21 & 24 & 28 & 115\end{array}\) (a) Find the mean and the median for these data. (b) The value of 115 appears to be an obvious outlier. Compute the mean and the median for the nine numbers with the outlier excluded. (c) Comment on the effect of the outlier on the mean and on the median.

Multiple studies \(^{61}\) in both animals and humans show the importance of a mother's love (or the unconditional love of any close person to a child) in a child's brain development. A recent study shows that children with nurturing mothers had a substantially larger area of the brain called the hippocampus than children with less nurturing mothers. This is important because other studies have shown that the size of the hippocampus matters: People with large hippocampus area are more resilient and are more likely to be able to weather the stresses and strains of daily life. These observations come from experiments in animals and observational studies in humans. (a) Is the amount of maternal nurturing one receives as a child positively or negatively associated with hippocampus size? (b) Is hippocampus size positively or negatively associated with resiliency and the ability to weather the stresses of life? (c) How might a randomized experiment be designed to test the effect described in part (a) in humans? Would such an experiment be ethical? (d) Can we conclude that maternal nurturing in humans causes the hippocampus to grow larger? Can we conclude that maternal nurturing in animals (such as mice, who were used in many of the experiments) causes the hippocampus to grow larger? Explain.

Use data on college students collected from the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment survey \(^{18}\) conducted in Fall 2011 . The survey was administered at 44 colleges and universities representing a broad assortment of types of schools and representing all major regions of the country. At each school, the survey was administered to either all students or a random sample of students, and more than 27,000 students participated in the survey. Students in the ACHA-NCHA survey were asked, "Within the last 12 months, have you been in a relationship (meaning an intimate/coupled/partnered relationship) that was emotionally abusive?" The results are given in Table 2.12 . (a) What percent of all respondents have been in an emotionally abusive relationship? (b) What percent of the people who have been in an emotionally abusive relationship are male? (c) What percent of males have been in an emotionally abusive relationship? (d) What percent of females have been in an emotionally abusive relationship? Table 2.12 Have you been in an emotionally abusive relationship? $$\begin{array}{l|rr|r} \hline & \text { Male } & \text { Female } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { No } & 8352 & 16,276 & 24,628 \\ \text { Yes } & 593 & 2034 & 2627 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 8945 & 18,310 & 27,255 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.