/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 85 Three situations are described a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Three situations are described at the start of this section, on page \(29 .\) In the third bullet, we describe an association between the amount of salt spread on the roads and the number of accidents. Describe a possible confounding variable and explain how it fits the definition of a confounding variable.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A possible confounding variable can be 'weather conditions'. This is because weather conditions might affect both the amount of salt spread on the roads (more salt is spread in bad weather conditions) and the number of accidents (more accidents may occur in bad weather) and may trick us into believing that there's a causal link between salt quantity and number of accidents.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Scenario

Consider the described situation: an association between the amount of salt spread on the roads and the number of accidents.
02

Identifying a Confounding Variable

A possible confounding variable in this scenario might be the weather conditions. The quantity of salt spread on the roads is likely to increase with worsening weather conditions especially during winter, as salt is used to melt ice.
03

Explaining as Confounding Variable

Now, the increased number of accidents may not be entirely due to the amount of salt spread on the roads, but could also be a result of bad weather conditions. Here, 'weather conditions' is the confounding variable because it is related to both the proposed cause (amount of salt on roads) and the effect (number of accidents). The confounding variable, the weather condition, could be making it seem that there is a direct relationship between the amount of salt spread and the number of accidents, when indeed there might not be a direct association.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Association
An association refers to a relationship or connection between two or more variables. In this context, it involves evaluating whether a change in one variable corresponds to a change in another. For example, we might assess whether greater quantities of salt on roads are linked with a higher number of accidents. However, it's important to recognize that an association does not necessarily imply causation. Causation means that one variable is responsible for the change in the other. Just because two variables are associated does not mean one causes the other.
Be careful not to jump to conclusions without sufficient evidence. For example, the association between more salt usage on roads and increased accidents may suggest a relationship, but other factors such as weather conditions must be considered to truly determine the nature of any connection.
  • Make sure you understand that association is about a statistical link, not about direct causes.
  • Avoid conflating correlation with causation, which requires more rigorous testing.
Weather Conditions
Weather conditions are the environmental factors such as temperature, precipitation, and wind that vary across different times and locations. In relation to road safety, weather can significantly impact the driving environment. Snow, sleet, or rain can make roads slippery, reducing traction and increasing stopping distances.
During harsh weather, more salt is often applied to roads to help melt ice and improve driving conditions. However, it is precisely these poor weather conditions that might lead to increased accidents. As a result, when evaluating the relationship between road salt usage and accidents, weather conditions become a potential confounding factor.
  • Understand that weather conditions can alter driving safety independently of other factors.
  • Recognize that they can complicate efforts to ascertain cause-and-effect relationships between variables like road salt usage and accidents.
Road Safety
Road safety involves measures and methods employed to reduce the risk of road users being injured or killed. It's crucial for protecting drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and all who use the roads. In adverse weather conditions, maintaining road safety becomes more challenging. Techniques such as spreading salt are used to enhance grip and minimize slip on icy roads. However, even with these precautions, accidents may still occur due to poor visibility or unexpected road conditions.
Understanding the extent and effect of road safety measures requires careful consideration of various factors, including not just conditions like ice and snowfall, but also how these conditions are addressed.
While good road safety practices mitigate risks, they cannot entirely remove the risks posed by weather-related variables. Therefore, assessing road safety should always include an evaluation of external factors like weather to ensure comprehensive safety strategies.
  • Keep in mind that road safety is an interplay of various protective measures and conditions.
  • Evaluate changes in accident rates with consideration for all contributing environmental factors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Can experiences of parents affect future children? New studies \(^{12}\) suggest that they can: Early life experiences of parents appear to cause permanent changes in sperm and eggs. In one study, some male rats were fed a high-fat diet with \(43 \%\) of calories from fat (a typical American diet), while others were fed a normal healthy rat diet. Not surprisingly, the rats fed the high- fat diet were far more likely than the normal-diet rats to develop metabolic syndrome (characterized by such things as excess weight, excess fat, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance.) What surprised the scientists was that the daughters of these rats were also far more likely to develop metabolic syndrome than the daughters of rats fed healthy diets. None of the daughters and none of the mothers ate a high-fat diet and the fathers did not have any contact with the daughters. The high-fat diet of the fathers appeared to cause negative effects for their daughters. What are the two main variables in this study? Is each categorical or quantitative? Identify the explanatory and response variables.

In 2008 , a study \(^{46}\) was conducted measuring the impact that music volume has on beer consumption. The researchers went into bars, controlled the music volume, and measured how much beer was consumed. The article states that "the sound level of the environmental music was manipulated according to a randomization scheme." It was found that louder music corresponds to more beer consumption. Does this provide evidence that louder music causes people to drink more beer? Why or why not?

To examine whether playing music in a store increases the amount customers spend, we randomly assign some stores to play music and some to stay silent and compare the average amount spent by customers.

To examine whether planting trees reduces air pollution, we find a sample of city blocks with similar levels of air pollution and we then plant trees in half of the blocks in the sample. After waiting an appropriate amount of time, we measure air pollution levels.

Climate Change In July 2015, a poll asked a random sample of 1,236 registered voters in Iowa whether they agree or disagree that the world needs to do more to combat climate change. \({ }^{26}\) The results show that \(65 \%\) agree, while \(25 \%\) disagree and \(10 \%\) don't know. (a) What is the sample? What is the intended population? (b) Is it reasonable to generalize this result and estimate that \(65 \%\) of all registered voters in Iowa agree that the world needs to do more to combat climate change?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.