/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 A relationship between two varia... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A relationship between two variables is described. In each case, we can think of one variable as helping to explain the other. Identify the explanatory variable and the response variable. Amount of fertilizer used and the yield of a crop

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this scenario, the explanatory variable is the 'amount of fertilizer used' and the response variable is the 'yield of a crop'.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the terms

To solve this problem, it's important to define and understand the two terms. An explanatory variable is one that can be manipulated or controlled, and it can affect the outcome or response variable. On the other hand, a response variable is what we measure or observe to test our hypothesis.
02

Apply the terms to the scenario

In this scenario, the 'amount of fertilizer used' is something that we can control or manipulate. We're interested in seeing how changing the amount of fertilizer used affects the 'yield of a crop'. Therefore, the explanatory variable is the amount of fertilizer used and the response variable is the yield of a crop.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variable
In the world of statistics, understanding the role of an explanatory variable is crucial for dissecting relationships between different phenomena. An explanatory variable, sometimes called an independent variable, is the element that researchers manipulate or decide to control in an experiment. Its purpose is to determine whether it has any effect on another variable, which is typically the one being studied or observed for change.

Let’s imagine you are a scientist interested in understanding how different amounts of fertilizer impact crop yield. Here, the amount of fertilizer is the explanatory variable. Why is it called that? Because you're changing it deliberately to see if it can explain shifts or variations in the outcome, which in this situation would be the crop yield. The key thing to remember is that the explanatory variable is something within your control—it’s not determined by other variables in the study.
  • Can be manipulated or controlled.
  • Helps explain changes in another variable.
  • Acts independently in the research setup.
Response Variable
While exploring relationships between variables, we cannot ignore the role of the response variable. Also known as the dependent variable, it is what we observe or measure—and analyze the changes in—when the explanatory variable shifts. It depends on the manipulation of the explanatory variable to show the pattern or effect.

Imagine you're continuing your experiment with fertilizer and crop yield. As you adjust the amount of fertilizer (the explanatory variable), you note changes in the yield of the crop. The yield is the response variable because it reflects what you are trying to measure the impact on. It helps provide insight into whether your hypothesis is supported or refuted by the data.
  • Is measured or observed.
  • Represents the outcome of your experiment.
  • Changes in response to the explanatory variable.
Cause and Effect in Statistics
Establishing a cause and effect relationship in statistics often revolves around identifying and understanding explanatory and response variables. The key is to determine whether changes in the explanatory variable directly cause changes in the response variable. This process involves generating hypotheses, running experiments, and analyzing data for patterns or connections.

In our example with fertilizers and crop yields, you're testing if an increase in fertilizer (cause) leads to an increase in crop yield (effect). Recognizing a cause-and-effect relationship is not always straightforward. Sometimes, variables can coincide with one another without having a direct cause-and-effect bond. Therefore, statisticians use methods such as experiments and observational studies to verify their predictions and establish causal links.
  • Focuses on understanding linkages between variables.
  • Assumes manipulation of explanatory variable affects the result.
  • Verification with data analysis and testing is crucial.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do Cat Videos Improve Mood? As part of an "internet cat videos/photos" study, Dr. Jessica Gall Myrick posted an on-line survey to Facebook and Twitter asking a series of questions regarding how individuals felt before and after the last time they watched a cat video on the Internet. \(^{31}\) One of the goals of the study was to determine how watching cat videos affects an individual's energy and emotional state. People were asked to share the link, and everyone who clicked the link and completed the survey was included in the sample. More than 6,000 individuals completed the survey, and the study found that after watching a cat video people generally reported more energy, fewer negative emotions, and more positive emotions. (a) Would this be considered a simple random sample from a target population? Why or why not? (b) Ignoring sampling bias, what other ways could bias have been introduced into this study?

Teaching Ability In a sample survey of professors at the University of Nebraska, \(94 \%\) of them descrihed themselves as "ahove average" teachers. \({ }^{28}\) (a) What is the sample? What is the population? (b) Based on the information provided, can we conclude that the study suffers from sampling bias? (c) Is \(94 \%\) a good estimate for the percentage of above-average teachers at the University of Nebraska? If not, why not?

A 2014 headline reads "Sitting Is the New Smoking: Ways a Sedentary Lifestyle is Killing You," 12 and explains the mounting evidence for ways in which sitting is bad for you. A more recent large 2015 study \(^{53}\) contributed to this evidence by following 69,260 men and 77,462 women and finding that for women, those who spent more leisure time sitting were significantly more likely to get cancer. (a) What are the explanatory and response variables for the 2015 study? (b) Is the 2015 study an observational study or a randomized experiment? (c) Can we conclude from the 2015 study that spending more leisure time sitting causes cancer in women? Why or why not? (d) Can we conclude from the 2015 study that spending more leisure time sitting does not cause cancer in women?

A biased sampling situation is described. In each case, give: (a) The sample (b) The population of interest (c) A population we can generalize to given the sample To investigate interest across all residents of the US in a new type of ice skate, a random sample of 1500 people in Minnesota are asked about their interest in the product.

State whether or not the sampling method described produces a random sample from the given population. The population is all trees in a forest. We walk through the forest and pick out trees that appear to be representative of all the trees in the forest.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.