/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 76 Describe an association between ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe an association between two variables. Give a confounding variable that may help to account for this association. Air pollution is higher in places with a higher proportion of paved ground relative to grassy ground.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Urbanization is a confounding variable that might help explain the association between air pollution and the proportion of paved ground relative to grassy ground. This is because urbanization increases both air pollution and the proportion of paved surfaces, potentially contributing to the observed correlation.

Step by step solution

01

Comprehend the Association

Understand the stated correlation and causation. The association here is that air pollution (variable 1) increases with increasing proportion of paved ground relative to grassy ground (variable 2). This understanding is important to correctly identify a suitable confounding variable.
02

Consider Possible Confounding Variables

Identify external factors that impact both variables in the stated association. A confounding variable might influence both the air pollution levels and the ratio of paved to grassy ground in the same direction. For example, urbanization could be such a variable. As cities expand, they tend to have more paved grounds and less grassy areas, and they also tend to produce more air pollution due to increased human activities and vehicle operations.
03

Choose Appropriate Confounding Variable

After exploring various potential confounding variables, select the most suitable one. Here, urbanization can be chosen as the confounding variable because it extensively influences both air pollution and the proportion of paved ground to grassy ground by forming the backbone of the observed correlation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confounding Variables
When examining the association between two variables, it's essential to consider confounding variables. These are external variables that affect both of the primary variables in the study, potentially leading to a misleading interpretation of their relationship. In the example provided, there is a correlation between air pollution and the proportion of paved ground to grassy ground. However, the confounding variable here is urbanization. Urbanization influences the amounts of paved and grassy areas while simultaneously affecting air pollution levels.
  • Urban expanses usually come hand in hand with increased construction and transportation, both contributing to more paved areas and higher pollution levels.
  • Failing to account for urbanization as a confounding variable might lead someone to incorrectly infer a direct causal relation between paved ground and pollution levels.
By recognizing the role of urbanization, we can gain a clearer understanding of the real dynamics at play, emphasizing the significance of confounding variables in research.
Causation and Correlation
It is crucial to differentiate between causation and correlation when analyzing data. Correlation refers to the statistical association between two variables, meaning they move together in some consistent way. Meanwhile, causation indicates that changes in one variable directly cause changes in the other.
  • In our case, the correlation between air pollution and paved ground suggests that these two variables change together.
  • However, we cannot immediately conclude causation – namely, that paved ground directly causes increased pollution without further evidence.
The presence of a confounding variable like urbanization shows that while there is an association, there might not be a direct causal link. Knowing whether a relationship is due to causation or merely correlation is essential for informed decision making.
In environmental studies, this distinction enables researchers to propose informed solutions rather than basing actions on erroneous interpretations. Understanding correlation versus causation is therefore a fundamental tool in both scientific research and real-world applications.
Environmental Statistics
Environmental statistics is a field that focuses on analyzing data related to the environment, often dealing with complex interactions between various factors. The interplay between air pollution and paved surfaces, as studied here, is a classic problem in environmental statistics.
  • By employing statistical tools, researchers can identify relationships and trends within environmental data sets, such as levels of pollution over time or space.
  • This helps in predicting future environmental changes and assessing the impact of human activities.
A major challenge in environmental statistics is dealing with multivariate relationships, often hampered by confounding variables. For instance, one might oversimplify and link increased air pollution solely to more paved ground without recognizing urbanization as an underlying factor.
Statisticians use various methods to control for such confounders, ensuring that the conclusions about environmental impacts are as accurate as possible. By properly analyzing environmental trends, these efforts can guide policies that mitigate negative impacts, ensuring sustainable futures.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Hookahs are waterpipes used for smoking flavored tobacco. One study \({ }^{13}\) of 3770 university students in North Carolina found that \(40 \%\) had smoked a hookah at least once, with many claiming that the hookah smoke is safer than cigarette smoke. However, a second study observed people at a hookah bar and recorded the length of the session, the frequency of puffing, and the depth of inhalation. An average session lasted one hour and the smoke inhaled from an average session was equal to the smoke in more than 100 cigarettes. Finally, a third study measured the amount of tar, nicotine, and heavy metals in samples of hookah smoke, finding that the water in a hookah filters out only a very small percentage of these chemicals. Based on these studies and others, many states are introducing laws to ban or limit hookah bars. In each of the three studies, identify the individual cases, the variables, and whether each variable is quantitative or categorical.

To examine whether planting trees reduces air pollution, we find a sample of city blocks with similar levels of air pollution and we then plant trees in half of the blocks in the sample. After waiting an appropriate amount of time, we measure air pollution levels.

State whether or not the sampling method described produces a random sample from the given population. The population is adults between the ages of 18 and 22. A sample of 100 students is collected from a local university, and each student at the university had an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

A biased sampling situation is described. In each case, give: (a) The sample (b) The population of interest (c) A population we can generalize to given the sample To estimate the average number of tweets from all twitter accounts in \(2015,\) one of the authors randomly selected 10 of his followers and counted their tweets.

Spiders regularly engage in spider foreplay that does not culminate in mating. Male spiders mature faster than female spiders and often practice the mating routine on not-yet-mature females. Since male spiders run the risk of getting eaten by female spiders, biologists wondered why spiders engage in this behavior. In one study, some spiders were allowed to participate in these near-matings, while other maturing spiders were isolated. When the spiders were fully mature, the scientists observed real matings. They discovered that if either partner had participated at least once in mock sex, the pair reached the point of real mating significantly faster than inexperienced spiders did. (Mating faster is, apparently, a real advantage in the spider world.) Describe the variables, indicate whether each variable is quantitative or categorical, and indicate the explanatory and response variables.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.