/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 72 Describe an association between ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe an association between two variables. Give a confounding variable that may help to account for this association. More ice cream sales have been linked to more deaths by drowning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A possible confounding variable in the association between ice cream sales and deaths by drowning is the temperature. In warmer weather, people are more likely to indulge in eating ice cream as well as partake in swimming, which increases the risk of drowning.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the variables

The two main variables here are ice cream sales and deaths by drowning. Note that an increase in one is associated with an increase in the other.
02

Understand the association

Though it may appear on the surface that ice cream sales and deaths by drowning are associated directly, there is no logical reason for this to be the case on first glance.
03

Identify a confounding variable

Consider factors that could affect both ice cream sales and deaths by drowning. Temperature is a possible confounding variable - in warmer weather, people are more likely to both eat ice cream and participate in water activities which could increase the risk of drowning.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation and Causation
When we observe two variables changing together, such as ice cream sales and drowning deaths seemingly increasing simultaneously, it's easy to jump to conclusions. This relationship between the two is known as correlation. However, just because two events occur together doesn't mean one causes the other. This is an important concept in statistics called "correlation does not imply causation."
Understanding this difference is crucial in data analysis, as mistaking correlation for causation can lead to incorrect conclusions. For example, if we assume that buying ice cream causes drownings, we might mistakenly restrict ice cream sales in an attempt to reduce drowning incidents. In reality, the relationship is more complicated. It's essential to delve deeper into data to find out if a true causal link exists, or if other factors are at play.
Confounding Variable
A confounding variable is a factor that might affect the relationship between the variables of interest, in this case, ice cream sales and drowning deaths. In this example, temperature is the perfect illustration of a confounding variable. As temperatures rise, people buy more ice cream to cool down and they are also more likely to engage in swimming and other water-related activities, which could increase the risk of drowning.
To avoid misleading conclusions, identifying and accounting for potential confounding variables is essential. This can involve:
  • Collecting additional data on potential confounders like weather conditions
  • Using statistical methods to control for the effects of these confounders
  • Performing experiments where possible to isolate the effect of the variable of interest
By considering confounding variables, analysts can gain a deeper understanding of the true relationships at play.
Variable Association
Variable association refers to the relationship between two variables. In our example, there is a noted association between ice cream sales and drowning deaths. But association doesn't mean one variable affects the other directly. Instead, it simply means there is a relationship worth investigating further.
Associations can be positive, where both variables increase together, or negative, where one variable increases as the other decreases. Recognizing the type of association is the first step in data analysis.
It's equally important to combine knowledge of correlation and identify potential confounding variables to comprehensively understand associations. Doing so adds depth to our insights and helps avoid drawing simplistic or erroneous conclusions based on mere associations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Infections Can Lower IQ A headline in June 2015 proclaims "Infections can lower IQ." 1 The headline is based on a study in which scientists gave an IQ test to Danish men at age \(19 .\) They also analyzed the hospital records of the men and found that \(35 \%\) of them had been in a hospital with an infection such as an STI or a urinary tract infection. The average IQ score was lower for the men who had an infection than for the men who hadn't. (a) What are the cases in this study? (b) What is the explanatory variable? Is it categorical or quantitative? (c) What is the response variable? Is it categorical or quantitative? (d) Does the headline imply causation? (e) Is the study an experiment or an observational study? (f) Is it appropriate to conclude causation in this case?

A study published in 2010 showed that city dwellers have a \(21 \%\) higher risk of developing anxiety disorders and a \(39 \%\) higher risk of developing mood disorders than those who live in the country. A follow-up study published in 2011 used brain scans of city dwellers and country dwellers as they took a difficult math test. \(^{61}\) To increase the stress of the participants, those conducting the study tried to humiliate the participants by telling them how poorly they were doing on the test. The brain scans showed very different levels of activity in stress centers of the brain, with the urban dwellers having greater brain activity than rural dwellers in areas that react to stress. (a) Is the 2010 study an experiment or an observational study? (b) Can we conclude from the 2010 study that living in a city increases a person's likelihood of developing an anxiety disorder or mood disorder? (c) Is the 2011 study an experiment or an observational study? (d) In the 2011 study, what is the explanatory variable and what is the response variable? Indicate whether each is categorical or quantitative. (e) Can we conclude from the 2011 study that living in a city increases activity in stress centers of the brain when a person is under stress?

Do Cat Videos Improve Mood? As part of an "internet cat videos/photos" study, Dr. Jessica Gall Myrick posted an on-line survey to Facebook and Twitter asking a series of questions regarding how individuals felt before and after the last time they watched a cat video on the Internet. \(^{31}\) One of the goals of the study was to determine how watching cat videos affects an individual's energy and emotional state. People were asked to share the link, and everyone who clicked the link and completed the survey was included in the sample. More than 6,000 individuals completed the survey, and the study found that after watching a cat video people generally reported more energy, fewer negative emotions, and more positive emotions. (a) Would this be considered a simple random sample from a target population? Why or why not? (b) Ignoring sampling bias, what other ways could bias have been introduced into this study?

The ability to recognize and interpret facial expressions is key to successful human interaction. Could this ability be compromised by sleep deprivation? A 2015 study \(^{58}\) took 18 healthy young adult volunteers and exposed them to 70 images of facial expressions, ranging from friendly to threatening. They were each shown images both after a full night of sleep and after sleep deprivation ( 24 hours of being awake), and whether each individual got a full night of sleep or was kept awake first was randomly determined. The study found that people were much worse at recognizing facial expressions after they had been kept awake. (a) What are the explanatory and response variables? (b) Is this an observational study or a randomized experiment? If it is a randomized experiment, is it a randomized comparative experiment or a matched pairs experiment? (c) Can we conclude that missing a night of sleep hinders the ability to recognize facial expressions? Why or why not? (d) In addition, for the people who had slept, the study found a strong positive association between quality of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep and ability to recognize facial expressions. Can we conclude that better quality of REM sleep improves ability to recognize facial expressions? Why or why not?

State whether the data are best described as a population or a sample. A questionnaire to understand athletic participation on a college campus is emailed to 50 college students, and all of them respond.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.