/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 79 Divorce Opinions and Gender In D... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Divorce Opinions and Gender In Data 4.4 on page \(227,\) we introduce the results of a May 2010 Gallup poll of 1029 U.S. adults. When asked if they view divorce as "morally acceptable," \(71 \%\) of the men and \(67 \%\) of the women in the sample responded yes. In the test for a difference in proportions, a randomization distribution gives a p-value of \(0.165 .\) Does this indicate a significant difference between men and women in how they view divorce?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, the p-value of 0.165 does not indicate a significant difference between men and women in how they view divorce, as it is greater than the typically used threshold of 0.05.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the P-value

A p-value is a number between 0 and 1 that is used in hypothesis testing to help you support or reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability that, if the null hypothesis were true, the observed data (or data that is more extreme) could occur. A low p-value (typically under 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you would reject the null hypothesis.
02

Interpret the P-value

In this case, the p-value is 0.165. This is greater than the commonly used threshold of 0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that, based on the data, there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant difference in the proportions of men and women that responded yes.
03

Conclusion

It is important to note that not rejecting the null hypothesis does not prove that the null hypothesis is true. It simply means that the observed difference between men and women could have happened due to random chance alone, and not necessarily due to a significant difference in their views on divorce.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
When we set out to conduct a hypothesis test, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is the proposition that assumes there is no effect or no difference between groups. In the context of the exercise involving the Gallup poll, the null hypothesis posits that the proportion of men who find divorce morally acceptable is the same as the proportion of women who do so. When analyzing statistical data, the null hypothesis serves as the starting point, and it's what we attempt to reject or fail to reject based on our p-value.

Although failing to reject the null hypothesis does not necessarily prove it's true, it does imply that there is insufficient evidence to claim a significant effect or difference exists.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination about the likelihood that the observed difference or effect in a study is due to something other than random chance. It's typically assessed using a p-value. If the p-value is below a predetermined threshold – commonly set at 0.05 – the results are deemed statistically significant, meaning there is less than a 5% probability that the results are due to random chance.

The Gallup poll’s p-value of 0.165 indicates that the differences observed between men and women regarding the moral acceptability of divorce are not statistically significant. Therefore, the study does not provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that any observed differences could well be due to random variation in sample responses.
Proportions Difference
When comparing groups, such as men and women in a survey about moral views on divorce, we often look at the proportions who respond a certain way to understand if there’s a notable difference. The difference in proportions is a subtraction of one group's proportion from the other group's proportion.

In our example, we have a 4% difference in observed proportions (71% of men vs. 67% of women). To determine whether this observed difference is statistically significant, we use hypothesis testing with our p-value. Since our p-value was not low enough, the evidence suggests that this 4% difference could quite likely have occurred by chance when there is actually no true difference in the entire population.
Gallup Poll
A Gallup poll is a type of public opinion poll that’s often used to measure attitudes and beliefs on a wide range of topics. These polls are structured to represent the opinions of a population by surveying a randomized sample of individuals.

For our analysis, the May 2010 Gallup poll asked a sample of U.S. adults their views on the moral acceptability of divorce. The methodology behind this and other Gallup polls ensures that the sample reflects the diversity of the larger population, which is critical for obtaining accurate and generalizable findings. However, even with careful survey methods, there is always a margin of error, which is where hypothesis testing and concepts like p-value come into play.
Moral Acceptability of Divorce
Public opinion on the moral acceptability of divorce can vary widely and may be influenced by several factors, such as religious beliefs, cultural norms, and personal experiences. The Gallup poll in question sought to measure this aspect of social opinion among men and women in the United States.

Analyzing the moral views of individuals about divorce, as in the case of the provided exercise, involves understanding not just the statistical outcomes of surveys, but also the implications these outcomes may have for societal norms and policy-making. Even with no significant statistical difference found between genders in this particular poll, tracking changes over time could provide insights into shifting cultural attitudes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do iPads Help Kindergartners Learn: A Series of Tests Exercise 4.163 introduces a study in which half of the kindergarten classes in a school district are randomly assigned to receive iPads. We learn that the results are significant at the \(5 \%\) level (the mean for the iPad group is significantly higher than for the control group) for the results on the HRSIW subtest. In fact, the HRSIW subtest was one of 10 subtests and the results were not significant for the other 9 tests. Explain, using the problem of multiple tests, why we might want to hesitate before we run out to buy iPads for all kindergartners based on the results of this study.

Does Massage Really Help Reduce Inflammation in Muscles? In Exercise 4.132 on page \(279,\) we learn that massage helps reduce levels of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in muscles when muscle tissue is tested 2.5 hours after massage. The results were significant at the \(5 \%\) level. However, the authors of the study actually performed 42 different tests: They tested for significance with 21 different compounds in muscles and at two different times (right after the massage and 2.5 hours after). (a) Given this new information, should we have less confidence in the one result described in the earlier exercise? Why? (b) Sixteen of the tests done by the authors involved measuring the effects of massage on muscle metabolites. None of these tests were significant. Do you think massage affects muscle metabolites? (c) Eight of the tests done by the authors (including the one described in the earlier exercise) involved measuring the effects of massage on inflammation in the muscle. Four of these tests were significant. Do you think it is safe to conclude that massage really does reduce inflammation?

In Exercises 4.107 to \(4.111,\) null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given. Give the notation \((\bar{x},\) for example) for a sample statistic we might record for each simulated sample to create the randomization distribution. $$ H_{0}: p=0.5 \text { vs } H_{a}: p \neq 0.5 $$

A situation is described for a statistical test. In each case, define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. Testing to see if average sales are higher in stores where customers are approached by salespeople than in stores where they aren't

Exercises 4.117 to 4.122 give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=28 / 40=0.70\) with \(n=40\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.