/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 107 In Exercises 4.107 to \(4.111,\)... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercises 4.107 to \(4.111,\) null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given. Give the notation \((\bar{x},\) for example) for a sample statistic we might record for each simulated sample to create the randomization distribution. $$ H_{0}: p=0.5 \text { vs } H_{a}: p \neq 0.5 $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample statistic used to create the randomization distribution would likely be the sample proportion denoted as \(\hat{p}\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Hypotheses

First, observe the hypotheses that are presented: \(H_0: p=0.5\) and \(H_a: p \neq 0.5\). Here, \(p\) represents the population proportion. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the population proportion is 0.5 while the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) states that the population proportion is not equal to 0.5.
02

Identifying the Sample Statistic

The criteria of the problem is to identify a sample statistic, notation for which we might record for each simulated sample to form the randomization distribution. The appropriate statistic for a test about a population proportion \(p\) is the sample proportion, commonly denoted by \(\hat{p}\).
03

Final Conclusion

Based on the nature of the problem and understanding the hypotheses, the significant sample statistic will be the sample proportion \(\hat{p}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, usually denoted as \(H_0\), is a fundamental concept in the realm of statistics and hypothesis testing. It is a statement that there is no effect or no difference, and it establishes a baseline that the study aims to challenge. For example, in the context of population proportion, the null hypothesis might state that the proportion of individuals with a certain characteristic is a specific value, such as \(H_0: p=0.5\).

This proposition is assumed to be true until evidence suggests otherwise. During hypothesis testing, we collect data and analyze it to determine if there is strong enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, thereby indicating that there may be a significant effect or difference present.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, designated as \(H_a\) or \(H_1\), serves as the counterproposal to the null hypothesis. It posits that there is indeed an effect, a difference, or a relationship. In our exercise, the alternative hypothesis is \(H_a: p eq 0.5\), suggesting that the population proportion is not equal to 0.5.

In practice, the alternative hypothesis is what researchers are usually trying to prove. It is never assumed true, but through hypothesis testing, one can provide evidence that supports it. If there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, then the alternative hypothesis may be considered an appropriate explanation of the observed data.
Sample Statistic
A sample statistic is a numerical characteristic derived from a sample of data, which is a subset of the larger population. The purpose of a sample statistic is to estimate the corresponding population parameter. In population proportion hypothesis testing, the sample statistic commonly used is the sample proportion, denoted as \(\hat{p}\).

The sample proportion represents the number of successes divided by the number of trials in the sample. It serves as an empirical counterpart to the theoretical population proportion \(p\). When we simulate samples to create a randomization distribution, we record the \(\hat{p}\) for each simulated sample as it reflects the proportion of successes in that particular simulation, which will be utilized in the hypothesis testing process.
Randomization Distribution
Randomization distribution is a crucial concept in statistical hypothesis tests involving simulation. It refers to the distribution of a sample statistic that would be formed if the null hypothesis were true and the data were obtained only by random chance.

To conceptualize this, imagine repeatedly taking samples from the population and calculating the sample statistic for each one, under the assumption that the null hypothesis holds. The variety of these sample statistics forms the randomization distribution. This distribution is then used to evaluate the likelihood of obtaining the observed sample statistic, aiding in the decision to reject or not reject the null hypothesis.
Sample Proportion
The sample proportion, represented by \(\hat{p}\), is a key measure in statistics when the focus is on a proportion within a population. It is calculated by dividing the number of individuals in the sample with the characteristic of interest by the total number of individuals in the sample.

Example and Significance

The significance of the sample proportion lies in its role as an estimator for the population proportion \(p\). For instance, if we want to estimate the proportion of people who are left-handed in the population, we would calculate the sample proportion of left-handed individuals in our sample as a representation of \(p\). This statistic becomes the backbone for conducting hypothesis tests regarding population proportions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 4.5 to 4.8 , state the null and alternative hvpotheses for the statistical test described. Testing to see if there is evidence that the mean of group \(\mathrm{A}\) is not the same as the mean of group \(\mathrm{B}\).

State the null and alternative hvpotheses for the statistical test described. Testing to see if there is evidence that the correlation between two variables is negative

Exercises 4.117 to 4.122 give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=30 / 50=0.60\) with \(n=50\)

Influencing Voters: Is a Phone Call More Effective? Suppose, as in Exercise \(4.37,\) that we wish to compare methods of influencing voters to support a particular candidate, but in this case we are specifically interested in testing whether a phone call is more effective than a flyer. Suppose also that our random sample consists of only 200 voters, with 100 chosen at random to get the flyer and the rest getting a phone call. (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses in this situation. (b) Display in a two-way table possible sample results that would offer clear evidence that the phone call is more effective. (c) Display in a two-way table possible sample results that offer no evidence at all that the phone call is more effective. (d) Display in a two-way table possible sample results for which the outcome is not clear: There is some evidence in the sample that the phone call is more effective but it is possibly only due to random chance and likely not strong enough to generalize to the population.

Election Poll In October before the 2008 US presidential election, \(A B C\) News and the Washington Post jointly conducted a poll of "a random national sample" and asked people who they intended to vote for in the 2008 presidential election. \(^{37}\) Of the 1057 sampled people who answered either Barack Obama or John McCain, \(55.2 \%\) indicated that they would vote for Obama while \(44.8 \%\) indicated that they would vote for MeCain. While we now know the outcome of the election, at the time of the poll many people were very curious as to whether this significantly predicts a winner for the election. (While a candidate needs a majority of the electoral college vote to win an election, we'll simplify things and simply test whether the percentage of the popular vote for Obama is greater than \(50 \% .\) ) (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses for testing whether more people would vote for Obama than MeCain. (Hint: This is a test for a single proportion since there is a single variable with two possible outcomes.) (b) Describe in detail how you could create a randomization distribution to test this (if you had many more hours to do this homework and no access to technology).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.