/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 73 In Exercises 4.71 to \(4.74,\) u... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercises 4.71 to \(4.74,\) using the p-value given, are the results significant at a \(10 \%\) level? At a \(5 \%\) level? At a 1\% level? $$ \text { p-value }=0.008 $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The results are statistically significant at all examined levels, 10%, 5%, and 1%, because the p-value is less than all these levels.

Step by step solution

01

Comparing the p-value with a 10% significance level

The given p-value is 0.008, while a 10% significance level means alpha equals 0.10. As the p-value is less than 0.10, this indicates that the results are statistically significant at a 10% level.
02

Comparing the p-value with a 5% significance level

The next step is to compare the given p-value with the 5% significance level, which is alpha equals 0.05. Again, since the p-value of 0.008 is less than 0.05, this indicates that the results are also statistically significant at a 5% level.
03

Comparing the p-value with a 1% significance level

Finally, compare the p-value with a 1% significance level, which is alpha equals 0.01. In this case, the given p-value of 0.008 is less than 0.01, indicating that the results are statistically significant at a 1% level as well.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value
The P-value is a core concept in statistics and plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing. It helps us determine the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. A P-value, or probability value, gives us the probability that the observed results would occur, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
If this probability, or P-value, is very low, this suggests that such results are unlikely under the null hypothesis assumption.
Here's how the P-value works:
  • The P-value ranges from 0 to 1, where a lower P-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • If the P-value is less than a chosen significance level (often denoted as \(\alpha\)), it suggests that the observed data differs significantly from the null hypothesis.
  • Common significance levels are 0.10, 0.05, and 0.01.
When interpreting a P-value like 0.008, you consider how it matches up to these significance thresholds. A P-value of 0.008 indicates very strong evidence against the null hypothesis at many common significance levels.
Understanding the P-value helps you make data-driven decisions about whether to reject or fail to reject a hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level in statistical analysis is a critical threshold used to decide whether your research results are significant. It is denoted by \(\alpha\), and it represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true. This is also known as the Type I error rate.
Key points about significance level:
  • Commonly used significance levels are 0.10, 0.05, and 0.01. These correspond to a 10%, 5%, or 1% risk of committing a Type I error.
  • A lower \(\alpha\) level means stricter criteria to determine significance, resulting in less risk of a Type I error.
  • Choosing the appropriate significance level depends on the context of the study and the potential consequences of making an incorrect decision.
For example, when your P-value is compared with a significance level like 0.05:
  • If the P-value is less than 0.05, the results are considered statistically significant, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.
  • If it's greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected.
This concept helps in making informed judgements when analyzing and interpreting statistical data.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis Testing is a fundamental method in statistics used to make decisions or judgments about a population parameter based on sample data. It's a systematic process that uses data to substantiate or refute a stated hypothesis.
Here’s a breakdown of the process:
  • Begin with a null hypothesis \(H_0\), representing a default position or a status quo. For example, "there is no effect" or "there is no difference."
  • Formulate an alternative hypothesis \(H_1\), which is what you aim to support through your test. It opposes the null hypothesis.
  • Collect and analyze sample data to test these hypotheses.
  • Use a statistical test to calculate the P-value.
  • Compare the P-value with your pre-determined significance level \(\alpha\) to decide whether to reject \(H_0\) or not.
  • If the P-value is lower than \(\alpha\), reject the null hypothesis suggesting that the observed effect is statistically significant.
This testing framework helps in gathering evidence and making conclusions about hypotheses based on sample data. Remember, the goal is not to "prove" the hypothesis absolutely but to assess the likelihood that the observed data could occur should the null hypothesis be true.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 4.146 to \(4.149,\) hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. 4.148 Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) vs \(H_{a}: \rho \neq 0 .\) In addition, in each case for which the results are significant, give the sign of the correlation. (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho: \quad 0.07\) to 0.15 (b) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho: \quad-0.39\) to -0.78 (c) \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho:-0.06\) to 0.03

Testing for a Home Field Advantage in Soccer In Exercise 3.108 on page \(215,\) we see that the home team was victorious in 70 games out of a sample of 120 games in the FA premier league, a football (soccer) league in Great Britain. We wish to investigate the proportion \(p\) of all games won by the home team in this league. (a) Use StatKey or other technology to find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of games won by the home team. (b) State the null and alternative hypotheses for a test to see if there is evidence that the proportion is different from 0.5 . (c) Use the confidence interval from part (a) to make a conclusion in the test from part (b). State the confidence level used. (d) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution and find the p-value for the test in part (b). (e) Clearly interpret the result of the test using the p-value and using a \(10 \%\) significance level. Does your answer match your answer from part (c)? (f) What information does the confidence interval give that the p-value doesn't? What information does the p-value give that the confidence interval doesn't? (g) What's the main difference between the bootstrap distribution of part (a) and the randomization distribution of part (d)?

Red Wine and Weight Loss Resveratrol, an ingredient in red wine and grapes, has been shown to promote weight loss in rodents. A recent study \(^{19}\) investigates whether the same phenomenon holds true in primates. The grey mouse lemur, a primate, demonstrates seasonal spontaneous obesity in preparation for winter, doubling its body mass. A sample of six lemurs had their resting metabolic rate, body mass gain, food intake, and locomotor activity measured for one week prior to resveratrol supplementation (to serve as a baseline) and then the four indicators were measured again after treatment with a resveratrol supplement for four weeks. Some p-values for tests comparing the mean differences in these variables (before vs after treatment) are given below. In parts (a) to (d), state the conclusion of the test using a \(5 \%\) significance level, and interpret the conclusion in context. (a) In a test to see if mean resting metabolic rate is higher after treatment, \(p=0.013\). (b) In a test to see if mean body mass gain is lower after treatment, \(p=0.007\) (c) In a test to see if mean food intake is affected by the treatment, \(p=0.035\). (d) In a test to see if mean locomotor activity is affected by the treatment, \(p=0.980\) (e) In which test is the strongest evidence found? The weakest? (f) How do your answers to parts (a) to (d) change if the researchers make their conclusions using a stricter \(1 \%\) significance level? (g) For each p-value, give an informal conclusion in the context of the problem describing the level of evidence for the result. (h) The sample only included six lemurs. Do you think that we can generalize to the population of all lemurs that body mass gain is lower on average after four weeks of a resveratrol supplement? Why or why not?

Arsenic in Chicken Data 4.5 on page 228 discusses a test to determine if the mean level of arsenic in chicken meat is above 80 ppb. If a restaurant chain finds significant evidence that the mean arsenic level is above \(80,\) the chain will stop using that supplier of chicken meat. The hypotheses are $$ \begin{array}{ll} H_{0}: & \mu=80 \\ H_{a}: & \mu>80 \end{array} $$ where \(\mu\) represents the mean arsenic level in all chicken meat from that supplier. Samples from two different suppliers are analyzed, and the resulting p-values are given: Sample from Supplier A: p-value is 0.0003 Sample from Supplier B: p-value is 0.3500 (a) Interpret each p-value in terms of the probability of the results happening by random chance. (b) Which p-value shows stronger evidence for the alternative hypothesis? What does this mean in terms of arsenic and chickens? (c) Which supplier, \(\mathrm{A}\) or \(\mathrm{B}\), should the chain get chickens from in order to avoid too high a level of arsenic?

Penalty Shots in Soccer A recent article noted that it may be possible to accurately predict which way a penalty-shot kicker in soccer will direct his shot. \({ }^{23}\) The study finds that certain types of body language by a soccer player-called "tells"-can be accurately read to predict whether the ball will go left or right. For a given body movement leading up to the kick, the question is whether there is strong evidence that the proportion of kicks that go right is significantly different from one-half. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses in this situation? (b) If sample results for one type of body movement give a p-value of \(0.3184,\) what is the conclusion of the test? Should a goalie learn to distinguish this movement? (c) If sample results for a different type of body movement give a p-value of \(0.0006,\) what is the conclusion of the test? Should a goalie learn to distinguish this movement?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.