/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 83 Three situations are described a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Three situations are described at the start of this section, on page \(29 .\) In the second bullet, we describe an association between activity at a building's heating plant and more employees missing work due to back pain. A confounding variable in this case is amount of snow. Describe how snowfall meets the definition of a confounding variable by describing how it might be associated with both the variables of interest.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Snowfall is a confounding variable in this scenario because it has the potential to influence both the activity of a building's heating plant (as more heating is required during snowfall) and the increase in employees missing work due to back pain (as snow conditions can lead to potential slips and falls causing back pain). Without considering this confounding variable, false conclusions might be drawn regarding the correlation between the activity of the building's heating plant and employees missing work due to back pain.

Step by step solution

01

Association between Snowfall and Activity at a building's heating plant

In colder seasons, particularly when there is snowfall, the demand for heating increases. To provide warmth, the activity at a building's heating plant may be higher. Hence, snowfall can directly affect the heating plant's activity level. Snowfall necessitates the heating plant to work more, leading to an increased association.
02

Correlation between Snowfall and Employees Missing Work

Snow can cause difficult travel conditions leading to possible slips or falls, potentially resulting in back pain. On snowy days, the likelihood of employees missing work due to back pain may be elevated. Therefore, this indicates a relation between snowfall and employees missing work due to back pain.
03

Concluding the Role of Snowfall as a Confounding Variable

Considering the above two steps, it is clear that snowfall is associated with both the heating plant's activity and employees missing work due to back pain. Thus, snowfall in this case stands as a confounding variable. If not accounted for, this can lead to an incorrect conclusion that the activity of the building's heating plant results in more employees missing work due to back pain, whilst the actual confounding variable is snowfall.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Association in Statistics
When studying statistics, we come across the term 'association', which refers to a relationship between two variables. In essence, if one variable changes, the other variable tends to change in a predictable way. Understanding association is critical because it helps us identify patterns that may suggest a link between different variables.

For example, consider a study that observes an increase in people wearing coats as the temperature drops. Here, the two variables—temperature and the number of people wearing coats—show an association; as one decreases (temperature), the other increases (people wearing coats). However, it's essential not to jump to conclusions about causation based on association alone.

As illustrated in the given exercise, snowfall and the increased activity at the heating plant are associated because colder weather conditions require more heating. Similarly, there's an association between snowfall and employees missing work due to back pain, as adverse weather can lead to injuries that result in absence from work. Recognizing such associations allows us to consider all potential variables in an analysis, leading to more accurate interpretations of data.
Correlation vs Causation
The concepts of correlation and causation are often mentioned together but represent distinct ideas in statistics. Correlation refers to a statistical measure that expresses the extent to which two variables change together. If we see a consistent relationship, we describe it as either a positive correlation (both variables increase or decrease together) or a negative correlation (one variable increases as the other decreases).

However, this is where a common fallacy can arise—assuming that because two variables are correlated, one causes the other, which is not always true. Causation implies that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; there is a cause-and-effect relationship.

Returning to our exercise, we might mistakenly conclude that the activity at the heating plant causes more employees to miss work due to back pain (a causation), without considering the true effect snowfall has on both of these variables (correlation). It's crucial, therefore, to consider whether a third factor, like snowfall in our case, could be influencing the variables being examined before determining a causal relationship.
Variable Relationships
In any statistical analysis, understanding the relationships between variables is paramount. This includes identifying independent variables, which are the presumed cause or predictor of change, and dependent variables, which are affected by the independent variables. Furthermore, there may be confounding variables—like snowfall in our exercise—that are not the primary focus of the study but have an impact on the other variables.

Understanding these relationships aids in forming proper conclusions. For instance, if we view the heating plant's activity as an independent variable and employee absenteeism due to back pain as a dependent variable, we might neglect the confounding variable of snowfall, which affects both.

It's critical to identify and account for these confounding variables to avoid erroneous interpretations. In research, this might involve including additional variables in the study design or employing statistical controls to separate out these effects. The goal is to reach a closer approximation of the true relationship between the variables of interest and make informed decisions based on that knowledge.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Music Volume and Beer Consumption In 2008, a study \(^{44}\) was conducted measuring the impact that music volume has on beer consumption. The researchers went into bars, controlled the music volume, and measured how much beer was consumed. The article states that "the sound level of the environmental music was manipulated according to a randomization scheme." It was found that louder music corresponds to more beer consumption. Does this provide evidence that louder music causes people to drink more beer? Why or why not?

Forty-one employees of a biotechnology company participated in a study \(^{14}\) that examines the immunological and psychological effects of meditation. Twenty-five of the participants, chosen at random, completed an eight-week meditation program while the other 16 employees did no meditation. Brain wave activity across the front of the left hemisphere was measured for all participants before, immediately following, and four months after the program. (Studies have suggested that increased activity in this part of the brain is associated with decreases in negative emotions and increases in positive emotions.) All 41 people received an influenza vaccination at the end of the program and their immune response to the vaccine was measured through blood samples taken one month and two months later. All participants also completed surveys designed to measure negative and positive emotions before and after the course. The surveys produced two numerical scores (one for positive emotions and one for negative emotions) in both situations. Meditators showed an increase in brain wave activity, a decrease in reported negative feelings, and no change in reported positive feelings. Nonmeditators showed no significant change in any of these areas. Meditators had a stronger antibody response to the vaccine than the non-meditators. (a) What are the cases in this study? How many cases are there? (b) What are the variables? Which are categorical and which are quantitative? (c) Which variable is the explanatory variable? (d) How many rows and how many columns will the dataset contain if we assume that each data case is a row and each variable is a column?

State whether or not the sampling method described produces a random sample from the given population. The population is adults between the ages of 18 and \(22 .\) A sample of 100 students is collected from a local university, and each student at the university had an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

Fast-Twitch Muscles and Race Example 1.5 studied a variant of the gene \(A C T N 3\) which inhibits fast-twitch muscles and seems to be less prevalent in sprinters. A separate study \(^{10}\) indicated ethnic differences: Approximately \(20 \%\) of a sample of Caucasians, approximately \(25 \%\) of a sample of Asians, and approximately \(1 \%\) of a sample of Africans had the gene variant. What are the variables in this study? Classify each as categorical or quantitative.

New research \(^{47}\) supports the idea that people who get a good night's sleep look more attractive. In the study, 23 subjects ages 18 to 31 were photographed twice, once after a good night's sleep and once after being kept awake for 31 hours. Hair, make-up, clothing, and lighting were the same for both photographs. Observers then rated the photographs for attractiveness, and the average rating under the two conditions was compared. The researchers report in the British Medical Journal that "Our findings show that sleep- deprived people appear less attractive compared with when they are well rested." (a) What is the explanatory variable? What is the response variable? (b) Is this an experiment or an observational study? If it is an experiment, is it a randomized comparative design or a matched pairs design? (c) Can we conclude that sleep deprivation causes people to look less attractive? Why or why not? 1.92 Do Antidepressants Work? Following the steps below, design a randomized comparative experiment to test whether fluoxetine (the active ingredient in Prozac pills) is effective at reducing depression. The participants are 50 people suffering from depression and the response variable is the changc on a standard questionnaire measuring level of depression. (a) Describe how randomization will be used in the design. (b) Describe how a placebo will be used. (c) Describe how to make the experiment doubleblind.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.