91Ó°ÊÓ

The following case study is reported in the article "Parking Tickets and Missing Women." which appears in an early edition of the book Statistics, \(A\) Guide to the Unknown. In a Swedish trial on a charge of overtime parking, a police officer testified that he had noted the position of the two air valves on the tires of a parked car: To the closest hour, one valve was at the 1 a'clock position and the other was at the 6 o'dock position. After the allowable time for parking in that zone had passed, the policeman returned, noted that the valves were in the same position, and ticketed the car. The owner of the car claimed that he had left the parking place in time and had returned later. The valves just happened by chance to be in the same positions. An "expert" witness computed the probability of this occurring as \((1 / 12)(1 / 12)=1 / 144\) a. What reasoning did the expert use to arrive at the probability of \(1 / 144 ?\) b. Can you spot the error in the reasoning that leads to the stated probability of \(1 / 144 ?\) What effect does this error have on the probability of occurrence? Do you think that \(1 / 144\) is larger or smaller than the correct probability of occurrence?

Step by step solution

01

Problem Interpretation

This problem revolves around the concept of probability. The determination of the probability of the air valves being in the same position after a certain period (even if the car was purportedly moved) is crucial. We will approach this case by analyzing the initial determination that was made, which led to the conclusion of \(1/144\) being the probability of this event.

02

Expert Reasoning Breakdown

The 'expert' calculated this probability by assuming that the position of each valve was completely independent, and each valve has 12 possible positions (like the 12 hours on a clock). From this assumption, he arrived at the probability of a particular valve being at certain hour position as \(1/12\). Considering the two valves, he then multiplied their individual probabilities to get \(1/144\).

03

Error Identification and Recalculation

The fundamental error in the 'expert's reasoning is that he treated the positions of the two air valves as independent events, which they are not. Since the car is moved and then parked again, both the tyres will rotate by the same amount, keeping the relative position of valves same. Thus, the probability of both valves being at the same relative position as before when checked some time later is \(1/12\) and not \(1/144\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

• Full Textbook Solutions

  Get detailed explanations and key concepts

• Unlimited Al creation

  Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

• Ads-free access

  To over 500 millions flashcards

• Money-back guarantee

  We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Calculation Error

Understanding and accurately calculating probabilities are critical in statistics, but errors can easily occur if the underpinning assumptions are flawed. In the example provided, a probability calculation error was made due to an incorrect assumption of independence between events. This is a common mistake and can significantly skew the results.

An 'expert' in the Swedish parking case incorrectly assumed independent events and calculated the probability of the car's valve positions to be \(1/12 \times 1/12 = 1/144\). However, since the two valves are on the same vehicle and move together, the probability of their respective positions isn't independent; hence the calculation should've been \(1/12\).

Such an error not only affects the outcome's numerical value but also impacts the decision-making based on that outcome. It is important, particularly in legal scenarios as presented, to accurately represent the likelihood of events. Had the correct probability been presented, it might have influenced the judge's decision differently, illustrating the real-world ramifications of a probability calculation error.

Independent Events in Probability

The concept of independent events is a cornerstone in probability theory. Two events are considered independent if the occurrence of one event does not influence the probability of the occurrence of the other event. For instance, flipping a coin and rolling a die are independent events; the result of the coin flip does not affect the outcome of the die roll.

In our textbook scenario, the expert witness mistakenly treated the positioning of the two air valves as independent, which would be true if, for example, they were on separate, unrelated vehicles. To prevent such errors, it's vital to critically assess whether events are truly independent. Recognizing dependent events can be less straightforward and often requires a careful analysis of the situation. Educating oneself on these concepts can avert misunderstandings and improve the accuracy of probability assessments in various fields, from legal judgments to scientific research.

Probability in Real-World Scenarios

Probability is not just an abstract mathematical concept; it plays a significant role in everyday decision-making and problem-solving. In real-world scenarios, the application of probability can differ greatly from textbook examples, as complexities and nuances of actual situations must be taken into account.

The parking ticket case highlights the need for a proper understanding of probability in the real-world context. Accurate probability analysis can support legal decisions, medical diagnoses, financial forecasting, and more. This necessitates meticulous analysis and sometimes a cross-disciplinary approach involving statistical expertise alongside domain-specific knowledge.

Real-world applications also involve communicating the implications of probabilistic findings to non-experts, such as judges, jury members, or patients, ensuring that these probabilities are well understood and appropriately used in decision-making processes.