/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 77 "Crime Finds the Never Married" ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

"Crime Finds the Never Married" is the conclusion drawn in an article from USA Today (June 29 , 2001 ). This conclusion is based on data from the Justice Department's National Crime Victimization Survey, which estimated the number of violent crimes per 1000 people, 12 years of age or older, to be 51 for the never married, 42 for the divorced or separated, 13 for married individuals, and 8 for the widowed. Does being single cause an increased risk of violent crime? Describe a potential confounding variable that illustrates why it is unreasonable to conclude that a change in marital status causes a change in crime risk.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Therefore, it is erroneous to conclude that being single causes an increased risk of violent crime based on the given data. It is more reasonable to say that the two factors - being single and violent crime rate - appear to be correlated, not necessarily causally related. The age of individuals is a potential confounding variable which might affect both factors, marital status and crime rate.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Data

The first task is to comprehend the data and the conclusion drawn by the article. The data given in the exercise is crime rates (number of crimes) per 1000 people for different groups of individuals separated by their marital status. The article suggests a correlation, saying that being single potentially increases the risk of violent crime. However, incomplete analysis might lead to this unjust conclusion of direct causality.
02

Identify the Confounding Variable

A confounding variable is an aspect that can influence both the dependent and independent variables, thus giving you the wrong impression of a strong correlation between them. Age can be a potential confounding variable here. Younger people might be more likely to be single and also more likely to be involved in crime. On the other hand, older people, who typically are married or widowed, might be less likely to be involved in violent crime. This suggests that the age of individuals might be an influencing factor on both the marital status and the crime rate variables.
03

Discuss the Difference Between Correlation and Causation

Just because two variables have a correlation, it does not necessarily mean one variable causes the behavior in another. To establish causation, one needs to prove that changing the independent variable directly results in change in the dependent variable. In this case, there must be evidence that changing one's marital status directly changes one's violent crime rate, which seems irrational. This is one main reason why it's important not to conclude causality from mere correlation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation vs Causation
When interpreting statistical data, it's essential to distinguish between correlation and causation. A correlation occurs when two variables are related to each other; yet, this relation doesn't necessarily imply that one variable causes the other. For instance, as found in the National Crime Victimization Survey, never married individuals may experience higher violent crime rates. These findings suggest a correlation, not a cause-and-effect relationship.

To claim causation, one must prove that changes in the independent variable (marital status) directly lead to changes in the dependent variable (crime rates). Without ruling out other factors or establishing a direct link, asserting that being single 'causes' an increased risk of violent crime is simply unjustified. Understanding that correlation does not imply causation helps prevent the misinterpretation of statistical results and the drawing of inaccurate conclusions.
National Crime Victimization Survey
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is a critical tool employed by the Justice Department to estimate the prevalence of crime incidents, primarily focusing on the frequency, characteristics, and consequences of criminal victimization in the United States. The survey covers a range of crime types and is valuable as it offers data that doesn't solely rely on police reports, thus capturing crimes that may not have been reported.

Through this survey, researchers are able to examine trends and patterns such as the crime rates among different marital status groups. However, while the NCVS provides a wealth of data, it is still subject to limitations such as potential biases, inaccuracies in victim recollections, and the existence of confounding variables which can affect the study's findings regarding the relationship between demographic factors and crime victimization.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is the science of collecting, exploring, and presenting large quantities of data to discover underlying patterns and trends. In the context of the NCVS data on marital status and crime victimization rates, statistical analysis can reveal important relationships between variables. It involves applying statistical techniques to make sense of the data, for example, calculating average crime rates for different groups.

However, accurate statistical analysis should also consider the role of confounding variables—other factors that may influence the results and could lead to erroneous interpretations if not accounted for. Sophisticated statistical methods, such as regression analysis, can help control for these variables, allowing researchers to gauge the true impact of the factors under study.
Violent Crime Rates
Violent crime rates are a measure of the occurrence of violent crimes in a given population or area. These rates are valuable indicators for law enforcement and policymakers to allocate resources and shape crime prevention strategies. Findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey, for instance, suggest different rates of violent crime based on marital status. Yet, it is important not to jump to conclusions without considering other influencing factors, such as socio-economic status, urbanization levels, and of course, the age of the individuals.

Furthermore, analyzing crime rates over time and across varying demographics can offer insights into the effectiveness of law enforcement and social programs. When evaluating such data, one must carefully interpret the statistics to avoid attributing causality where there is only correlation, thus maintaining the integrity of the conclusions drawn.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Doctors have expressed concern about young women drinking large amounts of soda and about their decreased consumption of milk (“Teenaged Girls, Carbonated Beverage Consumption, and Bone Fractures," Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine \([2000]: 610-613) .\) In parts \((a)-(d),\) construct two questions that might be included in a survey of teenage girls. Each question should include possible responses from which the respondent can select. (Note: The questions as written are vague. Your task is to clarify the questions for use in a survey, not just to change the syntax!) a. How much "cola" beverage does the respondent consume? b. How much milk (and milk products) is consumed by the respondent? c. How physically active is the respondent? d. What is the respondent's history of bone fractures?

Red wine contains flavonol, an antioxidant thought to have beneficial health effects. But to have an effect, the antioxidant must be absorbed into the blood. The article "Red Wine is a Poor Source of Bioavailable Flavonols in Men" (The journal of Nutrition [2001]: \(745-748\) ) describes a study to investigate three sources of dietary flavonol-red wine, yellow onions, and black tea-to determine the effect of source on absorption. The article included the following statement: We recruited subjects via posters and local newspapers. To ensure that subjects could tolerate the alcohol in the wine, we only allowed men with a consumption of at least seven drinks per week to participate \(\ldots\) Throughout the study, the subjects consumed a diet that was low in flavonols. a. What are the three treatments in this experiment? b. What is the response variable? c. What are three extraneous variables that the researchers chose to control in the experiment?

The article "l'd Like to Buy a Vowel, Drivers Say" (USA Today, August 7, 2001) speculates that young people prefer automobile names that consist of just numbers and/or letters that do not form a word (such as Hyundai's XG300, Mazda's \(626,\) and BMW's \(325 \mathrm{i}\) ). The article goes on to state that Hyundai had planned to identify the car that was eventually marketed as the XG 300 with the name Concerto, until they determined that consumers hated it and that they thought XG300 sounded more "technical" and deserving of a higher price. Do the students at your school feel the same way? Describe how you would go about selecting a sample to answer this question.

The article "High Levels of Mercury Are Found in Californians" (Los Angeles Times, February \(9,2 \mathrm{OO} 6\) ) describes a study in which hair samples were tested for mercury. The hair samples were obtained from more than 6000 people who voluntarily sent hair samples to researchers at Greenpeace and The Sierra Club. The researchers found that nearly one-third of those tested had mercury levels that exceeded the concentration thought to be safe. Is it reasonable to generalize this result to the larger population of U.S. adults? Explain why or why not.

A study of more than 50,000 U.S. nurses found that those who drank just one soda or fruit punch a day tended to gain much more weight and had an \(80 \%\) increased risk in developing diabetes compared to those who drank less than one a month. (The Washington Post, August 25,2004 ). "The message is clear.... Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages," said Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public Health, who helped conduct the study. The sugar and beverage industries said that the study was fundamentally flawed. "These allegations are inflammatory. Women who drink a lot of soda may simply have generally unhealthy lifestyles," said Richard Adamson of the American Beverage Association. a. Do you think that the study described was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that drinking soda or fruit punch causes the observed increased risk of diabetes? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.