/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 The article "Americans are 'Gett... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Americans are 'Getting the Wrong Idea' on Alcohol and Health" (Associated Press, April 19,2005 ) reported that observational studies in recent years that have concluded that moderate drinking is associated with a reduction in the risk of heart disease may be misleading. The article refers to a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that showed that moderate drinkers, as a group, tended to be better educated, wealthier, and more active than nondrinkers. Explain why the existence of these potentially confounding variables prevents drawing the conclusion that moderate drinking is the cause of reduced risk of heart disease.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Confounding variables which include education, wealth, and physical activity levels can falsely show a reduction in heart disease risk among moderate drinkers. These variables can be the actual reasons for reduced heart disease risk instead of the moderate drinking itself, hence we cannot conclude that moderate drinking alone reduces such risk.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Confounding Variables

Confounding variables are external factors that can affect the relationship between the independent variable (in this case, moderate drinking) and dependent variable (reduced risk of heart disease). If these variables are not controlled or adjusted for, they may influence the outcomes and lead to incorrect conclusions.
02

Identify the Confounding Variables in the Study

In the mentioned study, it is stated that moderate drinkers tend to be wealthier, more educated, and active than non-drinkers. These factors - wealth, education, and physical activity - are known to impact health, including heart disease risk.
03

Explain the Impact of the Confounding Variables

Greater education often leads to better knowledge about health and access to healthcare which can reduce heart disease risk. Wealth can allow for healthier lifestyle choices including better diet and preventative healthcare. Regular physical activity is proven to reduce risk of heart diseases. So, these confounding factors could be the actual reasons for the observed reduced risk in heart disease, not the moderate drinking.
04

Conclude with Relevance to the Study

Since the observed group of moderate drinkers had more of these beneficial factors, it would be incorrect to attribute the reduced heart disease risk solely to moderate drinking. The existence of these confounding variables makes it difficult to establish a causative link between moderate drinking and reduced heart disease risk, without considering or adjusting for these variables.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
An observational study is a type of research where outcomes are observed without manipulating the study environment or the participants involved. Instead of intervening, researchers simply record what occurs naturally. This style of study can be incredibly valuable for discovering correlations or associations between variables, such as lifestyle factors and disease outcomes.

For example, in the case of the research on moderate drinking and heart disease, by observing the habits and health outcomes of individuals, the study sought to understand if there's a link between the two. However, observational studies have limitations, mostly due to their susceptibility to confounding variables. These are factors that can influence both the independent variable (like moderate alcohol consumption) and the dependent variable (risk of heart disease), confusing the relationship between the two.

Therefore, while observational studies can suggest possible associations, they are not designed to definitively establish cause and effect. Additional research methods, such as randomized control trials, may be necessary to draw more conclusive causal connections.
Risk Factor Analysis
Risk factor analysis involves identifying and examining variables that might increase the likelihood of a negative health outcome. Understanding risk factors helps in designing prevention strategies and healthcare policies. In the context of the study related to alcohol consumption and heart disease risk, researchers are interested in whether moderate drinking is indeed a protective factor, or if other variables play a more significant role.

When conducting risk factor analysis, it is essential to consider potential confounders like socioeconomic status, education level, and lifestyle habits. These variables can skew the results if not properly accounted for. For instance, if moderate drinkers are more likely to be wealthier and have better access to healthcare, this could falsely appear as if their drinking habits are protective against heart disease. To avoid such situations, researchers use statistical methods to adjust their analysis and attempt to isolate the effect of the primary variable of interest—moderate drinking—on the risk of heart disease.
Statistical Causation
Statistical causation is the concept of identifying a cause-and-effect relationship through statistical methods. By applying various analytical procedures, researchers can estimate to what extent a particular variable, like alcohol consumption, causes an outcome such as a reduction in heart disease risk. However, establishing true causation in observational studies is challenging due to the potential presence of confounding variables.

In the research mentioned, simply finding that moderate drinkers tend to have a lower risk of heart disease is not enough to declare that moderate drinking causes the reduced risk. The confounding variables such as wealth, education, and physical activity levels must be factored in. These confounders can inadvertently mislead researchers and the public if the study's statistical analysis does not adequately control for their influence. When the goal is to establish causality, using methods like multivariable regression analysis can help to account for possible confounders, leading to more reliable conclusions about the statistical causation at play.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The head of the quality control department at a printing company would like to carry out an experiment to determine which of three different glues results in the greatest binding strength. Although they are not of interest in the current investigation, other factors thought to affect binding strength are the number of pages in the book and whether the book is being bound as a paperback or a hardback. a. What is the response variable in this experiment? b. What explanatory variable will determine the experimental conditions? c. What two extraneous variables are mentioned in the problem description? Are there other extraneous variables that should be considered?

Is status related to a student's understanding of science? The article "From Here to Equity: The Influence of Status on Student Access to and Understanding of Science" (Culture and Comparative Studies [1999]: \(577-602\) ) described a study on the effect of group discussions on learning biology concepts. An analysis of the relationship between status and "rate of talk" (the number of on-task speech acts per minute) during group work included gender as a blocking variable. Do you think that gender is a useful blocking variable? Explain.

Swedish researchers concluded that viewing and discussing art soothes the soul and helps relieve medical conditions such as high blood pressure and constipation (AFP International News Agency, October \(14,\) 2005). This conclusion was based on a study in which 20 elderly women gathered once a week to discuss different works of art. The study also included a control group of 20 elderly women who met once a week to discuss their hobbies and interests. At the end of 4 months, the art discussion group was found to have a more positive attitude, to have lower blood pressure, and to use fewer laxatives than the control group. a. Why would it be important to determine if the researchers assigned the women participating in the study at random to one of the two groups? b. Explain why you think that the researchers included a control group in this study.

An article titled “Guard Your Kids Against Allergies: Get Them a Pet" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, August \(28,\) 2002) described a study that led researchers to conclude that "babies raised with two or more animals were about half as likely to have allergies by the time they turned six." a. Do you think this study was an observational study or an experiment? Explain. b. Describe a potential confounding variable that illustrates why it is unreasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

The article “Placebos Are Getting More Effective. Drug Makers Are Desperate to Know Why." (Wired Magazine, August 8,2009 ) states that "according to research, the color of a tablet can boost the effectiveness even of genuine meds - or help convince a patient that a placebo is a potent remedy." Describe how you would design an experiment to investigate if adding color to Tylenol tablets would result in greater perceived pain relief. Be sure to address how you would select subjects, how you would measure pain relief, what colors you would use, and whether or not you would include a control group in your experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.