/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 The effects of grazing animals o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The effects of grazing animals on grasslands have been the focus of numerous investigations by ecologists. One such study, reported in "The Ecology of Plants. Large Mammalian Herbivores, and Drought in Yellowstone National Park" (Ecology [1992]\(: 2043-2058),\) proposed using the simple linear regression model to relate \(y=\) green biomass concentration \(\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\right)\) to \(x=\) elapsed time since snowmelt (days). a. The estimated regression equation was given as \(\hat{y}=\) \(106.3-.640 x\). What is the estimate of average change in biomass concentration associated with a 1-day increase in elapsed time? b. What value of biomass concentration would you predict when elapsed time is 40 days? c. The sample size was \(n=58,\) and the reported value of the coefficient of determination was \(.470 .\) Does this suggest that there is a useful linear relationship between the two variables? Carry out an appropriate test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The average change in biomass concentration associated with a 1-day increase in elapsed time is -0.640 g/cm^3 per day. b. The predicted biomass concentration when elapsed time is 40 days is 74.7 g/cm^3. c. The coefficient of determination is 0.470 which means 47% of the variability in biomass concentration can be explained by elapsed time since snowmelt. The usefulness of this linear relationship can be subjective and would normally require statistical testing for concrete evaluation.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret the Coefficients

In the regression equation \(\hat{y} = 106.3 - 0.640x\), the coefficient of \(x\) is \(-0.640\). This is interpreted as the average change in \(y\) (biomass concentration), for a one unit increase in \(x\) (elapsed time). Therefore, the average change in biomass concentration associated with a 1-day increase in elapsed time is -0.640 g/cm^3 per day.
02

Predict the Value of Biomass Concentration for \(x = 40\)

The estimated regression equation can be used to predict the value of \(y\), given any value of \(x\). For \(x = 40\) days, the predicted biomass concentration \(\hat{y}\) can be calculated as follows: \(\hat{y} = 106.3 - 0.640 * 40 = 74.7\) g/cm^3.
03

Interpret the Coefficient of Determination and Perform the Test

The coefficient of determination, \(R^2 = 0.470\), explains the proportion of the total variation in \(y\) that is explained by the variation in \(x\). Hence, 47% of the variation in the green biomass concentration can be explained by the elapsed time since snowmelt. If this is considered a high enough percentage for a particular context or scientific study, then it may suggest a useful linear relationship. However, performing an F-test or t-test would offer a more statistical proof if there's significant linear relationship. This is not discussed here as it is beyond the scope of this problem's requirement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regression Coefficient Interpretation
Understanding the rate at which changes occur in datasets is fundamental to predictive modeling. In simple linear regression analysis, the regression coefficient represents this rate of change, relating the independent variable to the dependent variable. Specifically, the coefficient tells us how much the dependent variable is expected to increase or decrease for each one-unit increase in the independent variable.

For example, if we have an equation \(\hat{y} = 106.3 - 0.640x\), the coefficient of \(x\) is \-0.640. This means for every additional day after snowmelt, the green biomass concentration decreases by 0.640 grams per cubic centimeter. The negative sign indicates the direction of the relationship—in this case, an inverse relationship: as days increase, the biomass concentration tends to decrease.

Why does this matter? Gauging the impact of time on biomass can help ecologists understand the ecosystem's health and make informed conservation decisions. Hence, interpreting the regression coefficient is a vital step in the analysis.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \(R^2\), plays a pivotal role in assessing the predictive strength of a regression model. It essentially quantifies the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable.

In our example where \(R^2 = 0.470\), it indicates that approximately 47% of the variability in green biomass concentration can be accounted for by the elapsed time since snowmelt. This number ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 implies no explanatory power and 1 signifies perfect prediction capability.

While a \(R^2\) value of 0.470 may not indicate a strong relationship, it does show that a non-negligible portion of change in biomass concentration can be predicted by time. Ecologists should consider whether this level of predictability is sufficiently informative for their purposes, and if so, use it alongside other ecological assessments to form a fuller picture of the ecosystem dynamics.
Biomass Concentration Prediction
Biomass concentration prediction is a crucial aspect for ecologists studying environmental change and its impact on ecosystems. In the context of our regression model, prediction is the process of determining the expected value of green biomass concentration given a specific elapsed time since snowmelt.

Using the simple linear regression equation \(\hat{y} = 106.3 - 0.640x\), we can predict that the biomass concentration after 40 days since snowmelt will be \(74.7\) g/cm3. This prediction is based on the established trend derived from sample data. However, predictions should always be accompanied by assessments of their precision and reliability. Such predictions can be particularly useful in preparing for periods of scarcity or abundance within grazing landscapes, aiding in the management of both animal populations and vegetation.

It is important to note that the accuracy of predictions can be affected by factors beyond the scope of the model. For instance, unanticipated environmental events like extreme weather conditions may disrupt the expected biomass growth patterns. Therefore, while predictions provide valuable insights, they should be interpreted with a level of caution and within the proper context of their application.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) research and development expenditure (thousands of dollars) and \(y=\) growth rate (\% per year) for eight different industries. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}x & 2024 & 5038 & 905 & 3572 & 1157 & 327 & 378 & 191 \\ y & 1.90 & 3.96 & 2.44 & 0.88 & 0.37 & -0.90 & 0.49 & 1.01\end{array}\) a. Would a simple linear regression model provide useful information for predicting growth rate from research and development expenditure? Use a .05 level of significance. b. Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the average change in growth rate associated with a \(\$ 1000\) increase in expenditure. Interpret the resulting interval.

An experiment to study the relationship between \(x=\) time spent exercising (minutes) and \(y=\) amount of oxygen consumed during the exercise period resulted in the following summary statistics. \(n=20 \quad \sum x=50 \quad \sum y=16,705 \quad \sum x^{2}=150\) \(\sum y^{2}=14,194,231 \quad \sum x y=44,194\) a. Estimate the slope and \(y\) intercept of the population regression line. b. One sample observation on oxygen usage was 757 for a 2 -minute exercise period. What amount of oxygen consumption would you predict for this exercise period, and what is the corresponding residual? c. Compute a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the average change in oxygen consumption associated with a 1 minute increase in exercise time.

a. Explain the difference between the line \(y=\) \(\alpha+\beta x\) and the line \(\hat{y}=a+b x\) b. Explain the difference between \(\beta\) and \(b\). c. Let \(x^{*}\) denote a particular value of the independent variable. Explain the difference between \(\alpha+\beta x^{*}\) and \(a+b x^{*}\) d. Explain the difference between \(\sigma\) and \(s_{e}\)

Explain the difference between a confidence interval and a prediction interval. How can a prediction level of \(95 \%\) be interpreted?

A random sample of \(n=347\) students was selected, and each one was asked to complete several questionnaires, from which a Coping Humor Scale value \(x\) and a Depression Scale value \(y\) were determined ("Depression and Sense of Humor." (Psychological Reports \([1994]: 1473-1474)\). The resulting value of the sample correlation coefficient was -.18 . a. The investigators reported that \(P\) -value \(<.05 .\) Do you agree? b. Is the sign of \(r\) consistent with your intuition? Explain. (Higher scale values correspond to more developed sense of humor and greater extent of depression.) c. Would the simple linear regression model give accurate predictions? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.