/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 The paper titled "Music for Pain... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 10: Problem 56

The paper titled "Music for Pain Relief" (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, April 19 , 2006 ) concluded, based on a review of 51 studies of the effect of music on pain intensity, that "Listening to music reduces pain intensity levels ... However, the magnitude of these positive effects is small, the clinical relevance of music for pain relief in clinical practice is unclear." Are the authors of this paper claiming that the pain reduction attributable to listening to music is not statistically significant, not practically significant, or neither statistically nor practically significant? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The authors of the paper imply that the effect of music on pain relief, albeit statistically significant, may not be practically significant due to the small effect size and questionable clinical relevance.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Findings

Understand the given information. The authors of the paper have concluded that listening to music does reduce pain intensity levels. However, they also mention that the magnitude of these effects is small. This leads to uncertainty on the clinical relevance in practice.
02

Define Statistical and Practical Significance

To better interpret the authors' claims, clarifications on what is meant by statistical and practical significance is necessary. Statistical significance refers to the unlikely chance that the research findings happened by coincidence, hence the result matters. Practical significance on the other hand refers to the real world application and usefulness of the research findings.
03

Interpret the Authors' Claim

From the authors' statement, it seems that they have found a statistically significant result since they've observed that music reduces pain intensity based on the reviewed studies. However, they express doubt on its practical significance as they highlight the small magnitude of the effect and questioned its clinical relevance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Clinical Relevance of Research
When researchers dive into a new study, their findings must have meaning and value in the real world, especially in healthcare settings. This is referred to as the clinical relevance of research. It goes beyond the dry percentages and p-values, touching on the actual impact that an intervention or treatment has on patients.

For instance, in the study 'Music for Pain Relief,' while it was found that music did have an effect on pain intensity, the scale of this effect caused scientists to ponder its clinical relevance. Even a statistically significant finding can be of limited use to clinicians if the effect size is so small that it would not alter patient care or improve health outcomes in a noticeable way. To bolster their analysis, researchers might consider factors such as the cost of the intervention, its ease of implementation, and its long-term impact on patient health.
Interpretation of Research Findings
The process of breaking down and understanding research findings is pivotal not only for scientists and clinicians but also for students and the wider community.

To correctly interpret research findings like those in the 'Music for Pain Relief' study, it is important to look at the complete context. It is not only the presence of statistical significance that counts but also what this means for broader applications. Students should be encouraged to ask questions like: What does a reduction in pain intensity really entail? How can this be applied in a clinical setting? Are there any limitations or constraints that might affect the interpretation of the results? By approaching findings with a critical eye and considering both the numbers and the narrative behind them, one can better grasp their significance and utility.
Statistically Significant Results
A result is deemed statistically significant when it is likely not caused by chance. However, statistical significance does not always equate to a large or important effect. It's essential, especially for students, to understand that a small p-value doesn't automatically make a discovery groundbreaking or even useful.

In the context of the 'Music for Pain Relief' research, the authors identified statistically significant results 鈥� music can indeed reduce pain levels. Yet, they noted the overall effect was modest. For educational purposes, it's crucial to clearly communicate that statistical significance merely flags a relationship that is probably real, but it does not provide any information on the magnitude or practical implications of the finding. This distinction is vital in preparing students to critically evaluate research and understand real-world implications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An automobile manufacturer is considering using robots for part of its assembly process. Converting to robots is an expensive process, so it will be undertaken only if there is strong evidence that the proportion of defective installations is lower for the robots than for human assemblers. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of defective installations for the robots. It is known that human assemblers have a defect proportion of .02 . a. Which of the following pairs of hypotheses should the manufacturer test: \(H_{0}: p=.02\) versus \(H_{a}: p<.02\) or \(H_{0}: p=.02\) versus \(H_{a}: p>.02\) Explain your answer. b. In the context of this exercise, describe Type I and Type II errors. c. Would you prefer a test with \(\alpha=.01\) or \(\alpha=.1 ?\) Explain your reasoning.

Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha,\) are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

Suppose that you are an inspector for the Fish and Game Department and that you are given the task of determining whether to prohibit fishing along part of the Oregon coast. You will close an area to fishing if it is determined that fish in that region have an unacceptably high mercury content. a. Assuming that a mercury concentration of \(5 \mathrm{ppm}\) is considered the maximum safe concentration, which of the following pairs of hypotheses would you test: $$ H_{0}: \mu=5 \text { versus } H_{a}: \mu>5 $$ or $$ H_{0}: \mu=5 \text { versus } H_{a}: \mu<5 $$ Give the reasons for your choice. b. Would you prefer a significance level of .1 or .01 for your test? Explain.

Medical personnel are required to report suspected cases of child abuse. Because some diseases have symptoms that mimic those of child abuse, doctors who see a child with these symptoms must decide between two competing hypotheses: \(H_{0}:\) symptoms are due to child abuse \(H_{a}:\) symptoms are due to disease (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) The article "Blurred Line Between Illness, Abuse Creates Problem for Authorities" (Macon Telegraph, February 28,2000 ) included the following quote from a doctor in Atlanta regarding the consequences of making an incorrect decision: "If it's disease, the worst you have is an angry family. If it is abuse, the other kids (in the family) are in deadly danger." a. For the given hypotheses, describe Type I and Type II errors. b. Based on the quote regarding consequences of the two kinds of error, which type of error does the doctor quoted consider more serious? Explain.

The paper "MRI Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer" (New England Journal of Medicine \([2007]: 1295-1303)\) describes a study of the use of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) exams in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The purpose of the study was to determine if MRI exams do a better job than mammograms of determining if women who have recently been diagnosed with cancer in one breast have cancer in the other breast. The study participants were 969 women who had been diagnosed with cancer in one breast and for whom a mammogram did not detect cancer in the other breast. These women had an MRI exam of the other breast, and 121 of those exams indicated possible cancer. After undergoing biopsies, it was determined that 30 of the 121 did in fact have cancer in the other breast, whereas 91 did not. The women were all followed for one year, and three of the women for whom the MRI exam did not indicate cancer in the other breast were subsequently diagnosed with cancer that the MRI did not detect. The accompanying table summarizes this information. Suppose that for women recently diagnosed with cancer in only one breast, the MRI is used to decide between the two "hypotheses" \(H_{0}\) : woman has cancer in the other breast \(H_{a}:\) woman does not have cancer in the other breast (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. One possible error would be deciding that a woman who does have cancer in the other breast is cancerfree. Is this a Type I or a Type II error? Use the information in the table to approximate the probability of this type of error. b. There is a second type of error that is possible in this setting. Describe this error and use the information in the given table to approximate the probability of this type of error.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.