/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Pairs of \(P\) -values and signi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha,\) are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Fail to reject \(H_{0}\) \n b. Fail to reject \(H_{0}\) \n c. Fail to reject \(H_{0}\) \n d. Reject \(H_{0}\) \n e. Fail to reject \(H_{0}\) \n f. Fail to reject \(H_{0}\)

Step by step solution

01

Case a: Comparing P-value and Significance Level

Given that P-value = 0.084 and \(\alpha\) = 0.05. Since 0.084 is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).
02

Case b: Comparing P-value and Significance Level

Given that P-value = 0.003 and \(\alpha\) = 0.001. Since 0.003 is greater than 0.001, we fail to reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).
03

Case c: Comparing P-value and Significance Level

Given that P-value = 0.498 and \(\alpha\) = 0.05. Since 0.498 is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).
04

Case d: Comparing P-value and Significance Level

Given that P-value = 0.084 and \(\alpha\) = 0.1. Since 0.084 is less than 0.1, we reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).
05

Case e: Comparing P-value and Significance Level

Given that P-value = 0.039 and \(\alpha\) = 0.01. Since 0.039 is greater than 0.01, we fail to reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).
06

Case f: Comparing P-value and Significance Level

Given that P-value = 0.218 and \(\alpha\) = 0.1. Since 0.218 is greater than 0.1, we fail to reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the P-Value
The p-value is a crucial concept in hypothesis testing. It helps us make decisions about the null hypothesis. So, what exactly is a p-value? To put it simply, the p-value indicates the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed data, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
For example, if we have a p-value of 0.084, it means there is an 8.4% chance of observing data as extreme as what we have if the null hypothesis \(H_0\) is true.
  • A small p-value (typically ≤ 0.05) suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, leading us to consider rejecting \(H_0\).
  • A large p-value (> 0.05) suggests that the observed data is consistent with the null hypothesis, meaning we fail to reject \(H_0\).
Significance Level Explored
The significance level, often denoted as \( \alpha \), is a threshold researchers set for determining whether the p-value is small enough to reject the null hypothesis. It's the risk level one is willing to take to reject \(H_0\) when it is actually true. Typically, common values for \( \alpha \) are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10.
This means that:
  • An \( \alpha\) of 0.05 indicates a 5% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.
  • If our p-value is less than \( \alpha \), it suggests strong evidence against \(H_0\), so we reject it.
  • If our p-value is greater than \( \alpha \), we do not have sufficient evidence to reject \(H_0\), so we fail to reject it.
The choice of \( \alpha\) depends on the field of study or specific experimental conditions. For high-stakes decisions, like drug approvals, researchers may choose a very low \( \alpha\), such as 0.01, to minimize the risk of incorrect rejection of \(H_0\).
The Role of the Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is the starting assumption for any hypothesis test. It often represents a position of no effect or no difference. For instance, if you're testing whether a new drug is effective, \(H_0\) might state that the drug has no effect.

In hypothesis testing, our goal is typically to see if we have enough evidence to reject \(H_0\) in favor of an alternative hypothesis \(H_1\), which represents an effect or difference. But we need substantial evidence to make such a decision.
  • We always assume \(H_0\) is true until evidence suggests otherwise.
  • The p-value shows how compatible your data is with \(H_0\).
  • Failing to reject \(H_0\) doesn't prove \(H_0\) is true; it only shows that we lack strong evidence against it given our data.
It's important to remember that not rejecting \(H_0\) because of a higher p-value might simply mean we need more data or a different testing setup to make definitive conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following quote from the article "Review Finds No Link Between Vaccine and Autism" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 19,2005 ): "'We found no evidence that giving MMR causes Crohn's disease and/or autism in the children that get the MMR, said Tom Jefferson, one of the authors of The Cochrane Review. 'That does not mean it doesn't cause it. It means we could find no evidence of it." (MMR is a measlesmumps-rubella vaccine.) In the context of a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis being that MMR does not cause autism, explain why the author could not conclude that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism.

The article "Theaters Losing Out to Living Rooms" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, June 17,2005\()\) states that movie attendance declined in \(2005 .\) The Associated Press found that 730 of 1000 randomly selected adult Americans preferred to watch movies at home rather than at a movie theater. Is there convincing evidence that the majority of adult Americans prefer to watch movies at home? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .05 significance level.

Optical fibers are used in telecommunications to transmit light. Suppose current technology allows production of fibers that transmit light about \(50 \mathrm{~km} .\) Researchers are trying to develop a new type of glass fiber that will increase this distance. In evaluating a new fiber, it is of interest to test \(H_{0}: \mu=50\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>50\), with \(\mu\) denoting the mean transmission distance for the new optical fiber. a. Assuming \(\sigma=10\) and \(n=10,\) use Appendix Table 5 to find \(\beta,\) the probability of a Type II error, for each of the given alternative values of \(\mu\) when a test with significance level .05 is employed: i. 52 ii. 55 \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { iii. } 60 & \text { iv. } 70\end{array}\) b. What happens to \(\beta\) in each of the cases in Part (a) if \(\sigma\) is actually larger than 10? Explain your reasoning.

The report "2007 Electronic Monitoring \& Surveillance Survey: Many Companies Monitoring. Recording, Videotaping-and Firing-Employees" (American Management Association, 2007 ) summarized the results of a survey of 304 U.S. businesses. Of these companies, 201 indicated that they monitor employees' web site visits. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample as representative of businesses in the United States. a. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that more than \(60 \%\) of U.S. businesses monitor employees' web site visits? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .01 . b. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of U.S. businesses monitor employees' web site visits? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .01

In a survey of 1000 women age 22 to 35 who work full time, 540 indicated that they would be willing to give up some personal time in order to make more money (USA Today. March 4, 2010 ). The sample was selected in a way that was designed to produce a sample that was representative of women in the targeted age group. a. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). b. Would it be reasonable to generalize the conclusion from Part (a) to all working women? Explain why or why not.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.