/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 51 A credit bureau analysis of unde... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A credit bureau analysis of undergraduate students credit records found that the average number of credit cards in an undergraduate's wallet was 4.09 ("Undergraduate Students and Credit Cards in 2004," Nellie Mae, May 2005\()\). It was also reported that in a random sample of 132 undergraduates, the sample mean number of credit cards that the students said they carried was 2.6. The sample standard deviation was not reported, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that it was 1.2 . Is there convincing evidence that the mean number of credit cards that undergraduates report carrying is less than the credit bureau's figure of \(4.09 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
If the calculated z-score in Step 3 is found to be less than the critical z-value (which corresponds to the chosen significance level) or the p-value is found to be less than the chosen significance level, there is convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean number of credit cards that students report carrying is less than the credit bureau's figure of 4.09.

Step by step solution

01

Hypothesize

First start by formulating the null hypothesis \(H_0\) and the alternative hypothesis \(H_A\). For this case, the null hypothesis is that the mean number of credit cards that students report carrying is the same as the credit bureau's figure, i.e., \(H_0: μ = 4.09\). The alternative hypothesis is that the mean number of credit cards that students report carrying is less than the reported average of 4.09, i.e., \(H_A: μ < 4.09\).
02

Calculate Standard Error

Next, calculate the standard error of the sample mean. The formula for standard error is \(SE = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\), where \(s\) is the sample standard deviation and \(n\) is the sample size. Substitute the given numbers: \(SE = \frac{1.2}{\sqrt{132}}\).
03

Calculate Z-score

Now calculate the z-score, which shows how far and in what direction the sample mean deviates from the population mean. Use the formula \(z = \frac{(\bar{x} - μ)}{SE}\), where \(μ\) is the population mean, \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, and \(SE\) is the standard error. Substitute in the given values: \(z = \frac{(2.6 - 4.09)}{SE}\).
04

Make a Decision

Finally, compare the calculated z-score with the critical z-value for the given significance level (typically 0.05). If the calculated z-score is less than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. Alternatively, compute the p-value associated with the observed z-score. If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level, reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is a foundational concept in hypothesis testing. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference and serves as the default assumption that there is nothing unusual happening. In the exercise, the null hypothesis posits that the mean number of credit cards carried by students is equal to the credit bureau's reported average, specifically \(H_0: \mu = 4.09\). Essentially, it's saying, "Let's assume that nothing has changed from the known average."
The null hypothesis is crucial because it sets the stage for the testing process. By assuming \(H_0\) to be true until evidence suggests otherwise, hypothesis testing maintains an objective standard. For students, it's important to remember: the null hypothesis provides a baseline and is always what you test against. You only reject it if strong evidence emerges that an observed effect or difference truly exists.
Alternative Hypothesis
In any hypothesis test, the alternative hypothesis, symbolized as \(H_A\), challenges the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is an effect or a difference. For our exercise, the alternative hypothesis is that the mean number of credit cards that students carry is less than the reported average of \(4.09\). Mathematically, this is represented as \(H_A: \mu < 4.09\).
Understanding the alternative hypothesis is critical because it represents what you want to test or prove. It is the claim you are interested in establishing over the null hypothesis. When the test results provide enough statistical evidence, the alternative hypothesis is accepted. In our scenario, if the evidence supports it, it means students on average carry fewer credit cards than reported by the credit bureau.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) measures the accuracy with which a sample mean approximates the population mean. It's essentially a measure of variability and is crucial for determining how spread out the sample data points are around the mean.
The formula for standard error is \(SE = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\), where \(s\) is the sample standard deviation and \(n\) is the sample size. In our exercise, to calculate the standard error, we use the sample standard deviation of 1.2 and a sample size of 132. Thus, the calculation would be \(SE = \frac{1.2}{\sqrt{132}}\).
Standard error is important in hypothesis testing because it forms the basis for determining the margin of error. It helps us understand how much the sample mean from a study deviates from the actual population mean, giving us an indication of the reliability of the sample as a representation of the greater population.
Z-score
A z-score quantifies the number of standard deviations a data point (or sample mean) is from the population mean. It is a crucial step when performing hypothesis testing, as it helps us understand the position of the sample mean relative to the hypothesized population mean. In our context, the z-score formula used is \(z = \frac{(\bar{x} - \mu)}{SE}\). Here, \(\bar{x}\) represents the sample mean, \(\mu\) the population mean, and \(SE\) the standard error.
Using this formula, we calculate the z-score to be \(z = \frac{(2.6 - 4.09)}{SE}\). The z-score helps determine whether the observed sample mean is a likely outcome, assuming the null hypothesis is true. If it falls beyond a certain threshold in standard deviation units (the critical value), it suggests that the sample mean is unlikely under the null hypothesis, offering grounds to reject it. Understanding the z-score is key for students as it objectively indicates whether evidence supports maintaining or rejecting the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha,\) are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll, 331 of 502 randomly selected U.S. adults interviewed said they would not be bothered if the National Security Agency collected records of personal telephone calls they had made. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of U.S. adults feel this way? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

In a study of computer use, 1000 randomly selected Canadian Internet users were asked how much time they spend using the Internet in a typical week (Ipsos Reid, August 9,2005 ). The mean of the sample observations was 12.7 hours. a. The sample standard deviation was not reported, but suppose that it was 5 hours. Carry out a hypothesis test with a significance level of .05 to decide if there is convincing evidence that the mean time spent using the Internet by Canadians is greater than 12.5 hours. b. Now suppose that the sample standard deviation was 2 hours. Carry out a hypothesis test with a significance level of .05 to decide if there is convincing evidence that the mean time spent using the Internet by Canadians is greater than 12.5 hours. c. Explain why the null hypothesis was rejected in the test of Part (b) but not in the test of Part (a).

10.52 - Medical research has shown that repeated wrist extension beyond 20 degrees increases the risk of wrist and hand injuries. Each of 24 students at Cornell University used a proposed new computer mouse design, and while using the mouse, each student's wrist extension was recorded. Data consistent with summary values given in the paper "Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" (Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report \(\mathrm{RP} 7992\) ) are given. Use these data to test the hypothesis that the mean wrist extension for people using this new mouse design is greater than 20 degrees. Are any assumptions required in order for it to be appropriate to generalize the results of your test to the population of Cornell students? To the population of all university students? \(\begin{array}{llllllllllll}27 & 28 & 24 & 26 & 27 & 25 & 25 & 24 & 24 & 24 & 25 & 28 \\ 22 & 25 & 24 & 28 & 27 & 26 & 31 & 25 & 28 & 27 & 27 & 25\end{array}\)

In \(2006,\) Boston Scientific sought approval for a new heart stent (a medical device used to open clogged arteries) called the Liberte. This stent was being proposed as an alternative to a stent called the Express that was already on the market. The following excerpt is from an article that appeared in The Wall Street Journal (August 14,2008 ): Boston Scientific wasn't required to prove that the Liberte was 'superior' than a previous treatment, the agency decided - only that it wasn't "inferior' to Express. Boston Scientific proposed - and the FDA okayed - a benchmark in which Liberte could be up to three percentage points worse than Express meaning that if \(6 \%\) of Express patients' arteries reclog, Boston Scientific would have to prove that Liberte's rate of reclogging was less than \(9 \%\). Anything more would be considered 'inferior.'... In the end, after nine months, the Atlas study found that 85 of the patients suffered reclogging. In comparison, historical data on 991 patients implanted with the Express stent show a \(7 \%\) rate. Boston \(S\) cientific then had to answer this question: Could the study have gotten such results if the Liberte were truly inferior to Express?" Assume a \(7 \%\) reclogging rate for the Express stent. Explain why it would be appropriate for Boston Scientific to carry out a hypothesis test using the following hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=.10\) \(H_{a}: p<.10\) where \(p\) is the proportion of patients receiving Liberte stents that suffer reclogging. Be sure to address both the choice of the hypothesized value and the form of the alternative hypothesis in your explanation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.