/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 A manufacturer of hand-held calc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A manufacturer of hand-held calculators receives large shipments of printed circuits from a supplier. It is too costly and time-consuming to inspect all incoming circuits, so when each shipment arrives, a sample is selected for inspection. Information from the sample is then used to test \(H_{0}: p=.01\) versus \(H_{a}: p>.01\), where \(p\) is the actual proportion of defective circuits in the shipment. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, the shipment is accepted, and the circuits are used in the production of calculators. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the entire shipment is returned to the supplier because of inferior quality. (A shipment is defined to be of inferior quality if it contains more than \(1 \%\) defective circuits.) a. In this context, define Type I and Type II errors. b. From the calculator manufacturer's point of view, which type of error is considered more serious? c. From the printed circuit supplier's point of view, which type of error is considered more serious?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A Type I error would happen if the shipment is rejected even though it has less than or equals to 1% of defective circuits. A Type II error would occur if a shipment with more than 1% defective circuits is accepted. The manufacturer would regard Type II errors as more serious as this scenario could lead to faulty calculators. For the supplier, a Type I error is more severe as it would result in the unnecessary rejection of a good shipment.

Step by step solution

01

Defining Type I and Type II errors

A Type I error occurs when we reject a true null hypothesis. In this context, a Type I error would occur if the manufacturer rejects a shipment that actually has less than or equals to 1% of defective circuits. A Type II error occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. Here, a Type II error would occur if the manufacturer accepts a shipment that, in fact, has more than 1% defective circuits.
02

Evaluating manufacturers view

The calculator manufacturer would consider a Type II error as more serious. This is because, in a Type II error, the manufacturer would accept a shipment with more than 1% of defective circuits. This could lead to producing calculators that are faulty which could tarnish the reputation of the manufacturer and may also lead to potential financial losses.
03

Evaluating supplier's view

From the supplier's perspective, a Type I error would be perceived as more serious. This is because, in a Type I error, the shipment is rejected even though it meets the quality standards (i.e., it has less than or equals to 1% defective circuits). This leads to the supplier losing business due to the unjust rejection of the shipment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
A Type I Error happens when you reject the null hypothesis, even though it is actually true. In simpler terms, it's like sending back a shipment of circuits thinking they are defective, when they are actually fine.
This error is also known as a "false positive." In our context of the calculator manufacturer, a Type I Error means rejecting the shipment despite it having 1% or less defectives.
Why is this important? Because if you make a Type I Error, you could be mistakenly assuming a problem exists when it doesn't. For the supplier, this means losing a business opportunity and potential revenue because their shipment met the quality standards but was mistakenly rejected.
  • Misinterprets the actual failure rate
  • Leads to unnecessary extra costs and delays
  • Risk of damaged business relationships due to incorrect assumptions

Being aware of Type I Errors helps in setting the right level of caution needed when testing hypotheses.
Type II Error
Type II Error occurs when you fail to reject the null hypothesis even though it is false. This is the opposite of a Type I Error.
Think of it as keeping a shipment that actually has too many defective circuits, more than 1%. You assume everything is fine when it's not, leading to production problems.
For the manufacturer, a Type II Error is considered more severe because faulty calculators may be produced, impacting quality and sales.
  • False assurance of quality can lead to widespread defects
  • Damages reputation and customer trust
  • Potential costly recalls or rework

It highlights the importance of rigorous testing and accurate interpretation to avoid costly mistakes.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a measure that helps determine if a result is not just due to random chance. It decides if the null hypothesis can be rejected.
In the context of hypothesis testing for defective circuits, statistical significance clarifies whether there is enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of defects is indeed greater than 1%.
To establish statistical significance, you often use a "p-value," which is compared against a threshold (alpha level, often 0.05). When the p-value is below this level, results are considered statistically significant.
  • Provides a standard for decision-making in hypothesis testing
  • Helps in minimizing errors by setting a threshold for evidence
  • Assists in understanding whether observed effects are genuine

Understanding statistical significance aids both the manufacturer and supplier in making informed quality control decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assuming a random sample from a large population, for which of the following null hypotheses and sample sizes \(n\) is the large-sample \(z\) test appropriate: a. \(H_{0}: p=.2, n=25\) b. \(H_{0}: p=.6, n=210\) c. \(H_{0}: p=.9, n=100\) d. \(H_{0}: p=.05, n=75\)

The report "Highest Paying Jobs for \(2009-10\) Bachelor's Degree Graduates" (National Association of Colleges and Employers, February 2010 ) states that the mean yearly salary offer for students graduating with a degree in accounting in 2010 is \(\$ 48,722\). Suppose that a random sample of 50 accounting graduates at a large university who received job offers resulted in a mean offer of \(\$ 49,850\) and a standard deviation of \(\$ 3300 .\) Do the sample data provide strong support for the claim that the mean salary offer for accounting graduates of this university is higher than the 2010 national average of \(\$ 48,722 ?\) Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05 .\)

The paper "Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences and Over-Indebtedness" (Social Science Research Network, Working paper W14808, 2008 ) included analysis of data from a national sample of 1000 Americans. One question on the survey was: "You owe \(\$ 3000\) on your credit card. You pay a minimum payment of \(\$ 30\) each month. At an Annual Percentage Rate of \(12 \%\) (or \(1 \%\) per month), how many years would it take to eliminate your credit card debt if you made no additional charges?" Answer options for this question were: (a) less than 5 years; (b) between 5 and 10 years; (c) between 10 and 15 years; (d) never-you will continue to be in debt; (e) don't know; and (f) prefer not to answer. a. Only 354 of the 1000 respondents chose the correct answer of never. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the sample is representative of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than \(.40(40 \%) ?\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) to test the appropriate hypotheses. b. The paper also reported that \(37.8 \%\) of those in the sample chose one of the wrong answers \((a, b,\) and \(c)\) as their response to this question. Is it reasonable to conclude that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

In a survey conducted by CareerBuilder.com, employers were asked if they had ever sent an employee home because they were dressed inappropriately (June 17 . 2008 , www.careerbuilder.com). A total of 2765 employers responded to the survey, with 968 saying that they had sent an employee home for inappropriate attire. In a press release, CareerBuilder makes the claim that more than one- third of employers have sent an employee home to change clothes. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence in support of this claim? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05 .\) For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample as representative of employers in the United States.

Many older homes have electrical systems that use fuses rather than circuit breakers. A manufacturer of 40 -amp fuses wants to make sure that the mean amperage at which its fuses burn out is in fact \(40 .\) If the mean amperage is lower than \(40,\) customers will complain because the fuses require replacement too often. If the mean amperage is higher than \(40,\) the manufacturer might be liable for damage to an electrical system as a result of fuse malfunction. To verify the mean amperage of the fuses, a sample of fuses is selected and tested. If a hypothesis test is performed using the resulting data, what null and alternative hypotheses would be of interest to the manufacturer?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.