/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 71 The following data on the relati... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following data on the relationship between degree of exposure to \({ }^{242} \mathrm{Cm}\) alpha radiation particles \((x)\) and the percentage of exposed cells without aberrations \((y)\) appeared in the paper "Chromosome Aberrations Induced in Human Lymphocytes by DT Neutrons" (Radiation Research \([1984]: 561-573):\) $$ \begin{array}{rrrrr} x & 0.106 & 0.193 & 0.511 & 0.527 \\ y & 98 & 95 & 87 & 85 \\ x & 1.08 & 1.62 & 1.73 & 2.36 \\ y & 75 & 72 & 64 & 55 \\ x & 2.72 & 3.12 & 3.88 & 4.18 \\ y & 44 & 41 & 37 & 40 \end{array} $$ Summary quantities are $$ \begin{gathered} n=12 \quad \sum x=22.207 \quad \sum y=793 \\ \sum x^{2}=62.600235 \quad \sum x y=1114.5 \quad \sum y^{2}=57,939 \end{gathered} $$ a. Obtain the equation of the least-squares line. b. Calculate SSResid and SSTo. c. What percentage of observed variation in \(y\) can be explained by the approximate linear relationship between the two variables? d. Calculate and interpret the value of \(s_{e}\). e. Using just the results of Parts (a) and (c), what is the value of Pearson's sample correlation coefficient?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The least-squares line equation, SSResid, SSTo, percentage variation, \( s_{e} \), and Pearson's sample correlation coefficient are all needed to complete this problem. They are calculated using summation values provided in the problem and related mathematical formulas, which include a lot of algebra and basic calculus.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the least-squares line

The equation for the least-squared line is given by \( y = a + b*x \) where, \( a = (\sum y * \sum x^2 - \sum x * \sum xy) / (n*\sum x^2 - (\sum x)^2) \) and \( b = (n*\sum xy - \sum x * \sum y) / (n*\sum x^2 - (\sum x)^2) \). Substitute the provided summation values into these equations to obtain values for a and b.
02

Calculate SSResid and SSTo

SSResid (sum of squares of residuals) is given by \( \sum y^2 - b * \sum xy - a * \sum y \). SSTo (total sum of squares) is given by \( \sum y^2 - (\sum y)^2 / n \). Substitute the provided summation values into these equations to obtain values for SSResid and SSTo.
03

Calculate the percentage of observed variation

This is calculated using the formula \( R^2 = 1 - (SSResid/SSTo) \). Here, \( R^2 \) is the coefficient of determination and it indicates the percentage of the variance in the dependent variable that the independent variables explain collectively.
04

Calculate the value of \( s_{e} \)

Once SSResid is calculated, use \( s_{e} = \sqrt{SSResid / (n - 2)} \). This standard error of estimate provides the standard deviation of the residuals or prediction errors.
05

Calculate Pearson's sample correlation coefficient

Given SQRT(SSTo) as denominator and SQRT(SSTo - SSResid) as numerator, use the following formula to calculate Pearson's sample correlation coefficient, \( r = \sqrt{SSTo - SSResid} / \sqrt{SSTo} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Least-Squares Line
The least-squares line, also known as the line of best fit, is crucial in linear regression analysis. It provides a straight line that best represents the data in a scatter plot by minimizing the sum of the squared differences—or residuals—between observed and predicted values. This helps students model the relationship between an independent variable, denoted as \(x\), and a dependent variable, represented as \(y\).
By applying the formulas mentioned above for \(a\) and \(b\), students can find the specific equation of the line, \(y = a + bx\). Here, \(a\) is the y-intercept, indicating where the line crosses the y-axis, while \(b\) is the slope, showing the line's steepness and direction.
Understanding this line is fundamental because it allows predictions about the dependent variable when given values for the independent one. Using the least-squares method ensures that the calculated line minimizes errors and represents the data as accurately as possible.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, represented as \(r\), captures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. Its value ranges from -1 to 1.
- A value near 1 suggests a strong positive linear relationship, where \(y\) tends to increase as \(x\) increases.
- A value near -1 indicates a strong negative linear relationship, where \(y\) tends to decrease as \(x\) increases.
- A value around 0 means there is little to no linear relationship between the variables.
In the context of linear regression, \(r\) not only provides information about the linear association but also serves as a foundation for calculating \(R^2\)—the coefficient of determination. A higher magnitude of \(r\) indicates a stronger linear relationship and greater predictive accuracy.
When students use the given formulas after finding \(SSResid\) and \(SSTo\), they can determine \(r\), gaining insight into how closely the model represents the observed data.
Variation Explained by Linear Relationship
The percentage of variation explained by the linear relationship is quantified as \(R^2\), or the coefficient of determination. This statistical measure indicates the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable.
Specifically, in a linear regression context, \(R^2\) is calculated as \(1-(SSResid/SSTo)\). Here, \(SSResid\) (sum of squares of residuals) measures the error variance, while \(SSTo\) (total sum of squares) measures the total variance in the dependent variable data.
A higher \(R^2\) value, closer to 1, suggests that the linear relationship explains a significant portion of the variance, thus yielding a reliable model. Conversely, an \(R^2\) value closer to 0 implies that the model does not explain much variance, indicating that other factors might influence the dependent variable significantly.
Understanding \(R^2\) can help students discern how well their chosen model fits the data and guides in making better predictions.
Standard Error of Estimate
The standard error of the estimate, denoted as \(s_e\), helps quantify the accuracy of predictions made by a regression line. It represents the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line.
Mathematically, \(s_e\) is calculated using the formula \( s_e = \sqrt{SSResid / (n - 2)} \). In this, \(n\) refers to the number of observations, and \(SSResid\) is the sum of squares of residuals.
- A smaller \(s_e\) value indicates that the data points are closer to the line of best fit, suggesting more reliable and precise predictions.
- Conversely, a larger \(s_e\) implies greater spread of data points and less precise predictions.
By understanding \(s_e\), students can evaluate the goodness-of-fit of their linear model better, assessing how much prediction error exists in their estimates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the study of textiles and fabrics, the strength of a fabric is a very important consideration. Suppose that a significant number of swatches of a certain fabric are subjected to different "loads" or forces applied to the fabric. The data from such an experiment might look as follows: $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Hypothetical Data on Fabric Strength }\\\ &\begin{array}{lccccccc} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Load } \\ \text { (lb/sq in.) } \end{array} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{1 5} & \mathbf{3 5} & \mathbf{5 0} & \mathbf{7 0} & \mathbf{8 0} & \mathbf{9 0} \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Proportion } \\ \text { failing } \end{array} & 0.02 & 0.04 & 0.20 & 0.23 & 0.32 & 0.34 & 0.43 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Make a scatterplot of the proportion failing versus the load on the fabric. b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the loads and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b\) (Load). What is the significance of a positive slope for this line? c. What proportion of the time would you estimate this fabric would fail if a load of \(60 \mathrm{lb} / \mathrm{sq}\) in. were applied? d. In order to avoid a "wardrobe malfunction," one would like to use fabric that has less than a \(5 \%\) chance of failing. Suppose that this fabric is our choice for a new shirt. To have less than a \(5 \%\) chance of failing, what would you estimate to be the maximum "safe" load in \(\mathrm{lb} / \mathrm{sq}\) in.?

The accompanying data were read from graphs that appeared in the article "Bush Timber Proposal Runs Counter to the Record" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, September 22,2002 ). The variables shown are the number of acres burned in forest fires in the western United States and timber sales. $$ \begin{array}{lrr} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Number of } \\ \text { Acres Burned } \\ \text { (thousands) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Timber Sales } \\ \text { (billions of } \\ \text { board feet) } \end{array} \\ \hline 1945 & 200 & 2.0 \\ 1950 & 250 & 3.7 \\ 1955 & 260 & 4.4 \\ 1960 & 380 & 6.8 \\ 1965 & 80 & 9.7 \\ 1970 & 450 & 11.0 \\ 1975 & 180 & 11.0 \\ 1980 & 240 & 10.2 \\ 1985 & 440 & 10.0 \\ 1990 & 400 & 11.0 \\ 1995 & 180 & 3.8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Is there a correlation between timber sales and acres burned in forest fires? Compute and interpret the value of the correlation coefficient. b. The article concludes that "heavier logging led to large forest fires." Do you think this conclusion is justified based on the given data? Explain.

Each individual in a sample was asked to indicate on a quantitative scale how willing he or she was to spend money on the environment and also how strongly he or she believed in God ("Religion and Attitudes Toward the Environment," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion [1993]: \(19-28\) ). The resulting value of the sample correlation coefficient was \(r=-.085\). Would you agree with the stated conclusion that stronger support for environmental spending is associated with a weaker degree of belief in God? Explain your reasoning.

The article "Air Pollution and Medical Care Use by Older Americans" (Health Affairs [2002]: 207-214) gave data on a measure of pollution (in micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter of air) and the cost of medical care per person over age 65 for six geographical regions of the United States: $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Region } & \text { Pollution } & \text { Cost of Medical Care } \\ \hline \text { North } & 30.0 & 915 \\ \text { Upper South } & 31.8 & 891 \\ \text { Deep South } & 32.1 & 968 \\ \text { West South } & 26.8 & 972 \\ \text { Big Sky } & 30.4 & 952 \\ \text { West } & 40.0 & 899 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of the data. Describe any interesting features of the scatterplot. b. Find the equation of the least-squares line describing the relationship between \(y=\) medical cost and \(x=\) pollution. c. Is the slope of the least-squares line positive or negative? Is this consistent with your description of the relationship in Part (a)? d. Do the scatterplot and the equation of the least-squares line support the researchers' conclusion that elderly people who live in more polluted areas have higher medical costs? Explain.

An auction house released a list of 25 recently sold paintings. Eight artists were represented in these sales. The sale price of each painting appears on the list. Would the correlation coefficient be an appropriate way to summarize the relationship between artist \((x)\) and sale price \((y)\) ? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.