/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 70 The paper cited in Exercise \(5.... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper cited in Exercise \(5.69\) gave a scatterplot in which \(x\) values were for anterior teeth. Consider the following representative subset of the data: $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{lllrrl} x & 15 & 19 & 31 & 39 & 41 \\ y & 23 & 52 & 65 & 55 & 32 \\ x & 44 & 47 & 48 & 55 & 65 \\ y & 60 & 78 & 59 & 61 & 60 \\ \sum x=404 & \sum x y=18,448 & \sum y=545 & \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{rl} \sum x=404 & \sum x y=18,448 \quad \sum y=545 \\ a=32.080888 & b=0.554929 \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Calculate the predicted values and residuals. b. Use the results of Part (a) to obtain SSResid and \(r^{2}\). c. Does the least-squares line appear to give accurate predictions? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The predicted values and residuals are computed using y = a+ bx regression equation. Afterwards, the sum of squared residuals, SSResid, is calculated by totalling up the squared residuals. The coefficient of determination, \(r^{2}\), is determined by the formula \(r^{2} = 1- (SSResid/SST)\). The accuracy of the predictions made by the least-squares line can be assessed by examining the amount of spread in the residuals and the value of \(r^{2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the predicted values

Given regression line equation \(y=a+bx\), where \(a=32.080888\) is intercept and \(b = 0.554929\) is the slope. Use this equation to calculate predicted values. With an x-value in the equation to predict the y(values).
02

Calculating residuals

Subtract each predicted y-value from the corresponding observed y-value to obtain the residuals. Residual = Observed y - Predicted y (.i.e a measure of error).
03

Calculate SSResid and \(r^{2}\)

SSResid is the sum of the squares of the residuals, which is computed as \(SSResid= \Sigma (Observed y - Predicted y)^{2}\). The coefficient of Determination \(r^{2}\) can be calculated using the formula \(r^{2} = 1- (SSResid/SST)\), where SST= total sum of squares = \( \Sigma (Observed y - mean of y)^2 \).
04

Interpret the results

Check the value of \(r^{2}\) that indicates the percentage of the data fit by the model, High \(r^{2}\) indicates the regression line fits the data well and can provide more accurate predictions. The residuals (errors) should also be examined; a reliable model should have small (close to 0) and randomly distributed residuals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Predicted Values
To understand predicted values, it's essential to start with the regression line equation. In this exercise, the equation is given as \(y = a + bx\), where \(a = 32.080888\) is the intercept, and \(b = 0.554929\) is the slope. The purpose of this equation is to predict the outcome \(y\) based on a given \(x\) value.
To find a predicted value, substitute the \(x\) value from your dataset into the equation. For example, if \(x = 15\), we calculate \(y = 32.080888 + 0.554929 \times 15\). Repeat this process for each \(x\) value in the dataset to obtain all the predicted \(y\) values.
This gives you a series of points along the regression line, providing an estimate of the dependent variable for each specific value of the independent variable. It’s important because these predicted values help you understand trends and patterns within the data, making them crucial for forecasting and decision-making.
Residuals
Residuals are a key concept in regression analysis. They measure the error in our predictions and are calculated as the difference between the observed \(y\) values and the predicted \(y\) values. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
\[\text{Residual} = \text{Observed y} - \text{Predicted y}\]
Residuals give insight into how well our regression line predicts the actual data. Ideally, these differences should be small, indicating our model is doing a good job. If they are large, it suggests our model may not fit the data well.
Analyzing residuals involves examining both their size and distribution. A good regression model will have residuals that are close to zero and randomly scattered around the regression line. Patterns in a residual plot, such as clustering or a systematic structure, could indicate a poor fit, which may require a re-examination of the model or the consideration of additional variables.
Coefficient of Determination (r²)
The Coefficient of Determination, represented as \(r^2\), is a crucial metric for assessing how well our regression model fits the data. It represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable. The formula used is:
\[ r^{2} = 1 - \frac{SSResid}{SST} \]
where \(SSResid\) is the sum of squares of the residuals, and \(SST\) is the total sum of squares, calculated as \( \Sigma (\text{Observed y} - \text{mean of y})^2 \).
An \(r^2\) value ranges from 0 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong relationship between the variables and implies a good fit for the data. A low \(r^2\) value suggests that the model doesn't explain much of the variance and may need refinement.
Understanding \(r^2\) helps in validating the model's effectiveness. It answers the question of how much of the data's variation is explained by our model, providing reassurance in predictions and assisting in comparisons between different models.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Examined Life: What Stanley H. Kaplan Taught Us About the SAT" (The New Yorker [December 17,2001\(]: 86-92\) ) included a summary of findings regarding the use of SAT I scores, SAT II scores, and high school grade point average (GPA) to predict first-year college GPA. The article states that "among these, SAT II scores are the best predictor, explaining 16 percent of the variance in first-year college grades. GPA was second at \(15.4\) percent, and SAT I was last at \(13.3\) percent." a. If the data from this study were used to fit a leastsquares line with \(y=\) first-year college \(\mathrm{GPA}\) and \(x=\) high school GPA, what would the value of \(r^{2}\) have been? b. The article stated that SAT II was the best predictor of first-year college grades. Do you think that predictions based on a least-squares line with \(y=\) first-year college GPA and \(x=\) SAT II score would have been very accurate? Explain why or why not.

Consider the four \((x, y)\) pairs \((0,0),(1,1),(1,-1)\), and \((2,0)\). a. What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient \(r\) ? b. If a fifth observation is made at the value \(x=6\), find a value of \(y\) for which \(r>.5\). c. If a fifth observation is made at the value \(x=6\), find a value of \(y\) for which \(r<.5\).

Draw two scatterplots, one for which \(r=1\) and a second for which \(r=-1\).

The paper "A Cross-National Relationship Betwee Sugar Consumption and Major Depression?" (Depression and Anxiety [2002]: \(118-120\) ) concluded that there was a correlation between refined sugar consumption (calories per person per day) and annual rate of major depression (cases per 100 people) based on data from 6 countries. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Country } & \text { Consumption Rate } \\ \hline \text { Korea } & 150 & 2.3 \\ \text { United States } & 300 & 3.0 \\ \text { France } & 350 & 4.4 \\ \text { Germany } & 375 & 5.0 \\ \text { Canada } & 390 & 5.2 \\ \text { New Zealand } & 480 & 5.7 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Compute and interpret the correlation coefficient for this data set. b. Is it reasonable to conclude that increasing sugar consumption leads to higher rates of depression? Explain. c. Do you have any concerns about this study that would make you hesitant to generalize these conclusions to other countries?

Explain why the slope \(b\) of the least-squares line always has the same sign (positive or negative) as does the sample correlation coefficient \(r\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.