/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 64 The hypothetical data below are ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The hypothetical data below are from a toxicity study designed to measure the effectiveness of different doses of a pesticide on mosquitoes. The table below summarizes the concentration of the pesticide, the sample sizes, and the number of critters dispatched. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{l} \text { Concentra- } \\ \text { tion }(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cc}) \end{array} & 0.10 & 0.15 & 0.20 & 0.30 & 0.50 & 0.70 & 0.95 \\ &\hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Number of } \\ \text { mosquitoes } \end{array} & 48 & 52 & 56 & 51 & 47 & 53 & 51 \\ &\begin{array}{l} \text { Number } \\ \text { killed } \end{array} & 10 & 13 & 25 & 31 & 39 & 51 & 49 \\ &\hline \end{aligned} $$ a. Make a scatterplot of the proportions of mosquitoes killed versus the pesticide concentration. b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the concentrations and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b\) (Concentration). What is the significance of a positive slope for this line? c. The point at which the dose kills \(50 \%\) of the pests is sometimes called LD50, for "Lethal dose \(50 \% . "\) What would you estimate to be LD50 for this pesticide and for mosquitoes?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The LD50, the concentration of the pesticide that will kill 50% of the mosquitoes, can be calculated from the fitted regression line. The positive slope indicates that as the pesticide concentration increases, the proportion of mosquitoes killed also increases.

Step by step solution

01

Creating a Scatterplot

First, we plot the proportions of mosquitoes killed versus the pesticide concentrations on a scatterplot graph. The x-axis represents the pesticide concentration and the y-axis represents the proportions of mosquitoes killed.
02

Calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\)

Next, we calculate the proportion \(p\) which is \((\text{Number Killed}/\text{Total Number of Mosquitoes})\) for each concentration. We then transform each of these proportions using the logistic transformation \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) to make it suitable for linear regression.
03

Fitting the Line

We then fit a regression line \(y^{\prime}=a+b\,\text{(Concentration)}\), where \(a\) is the y-intercept and \(b\) is the slope.
04

Interpret the Slope

A positive slope means there's a positive relationship between the pesticide concentration and the proportion of mosquitoes killed. The higher the concentration of the pesticide, the higher the proportion of mosquitoes killed.
05

Estimating LD50

LD50 estimates the pesticide concentration that would kill 50% of the mosquitoes. This can be calculated by rearranging the logistic regression equation to solve for concentration when \(y^{\prime} = \ln \left(\frac{0.5}{1-0.5}\right)= 0\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Scatterplots
When we talk about scatterplots, we're referring to a type of graph that's pivotal in statistics for displaying the relationship between two continuous variables. In the context of a toxicity study, a scatterplot can visualize how different concentrations of a substance, like the pesticide in our example, affect a particular outcome—in this case, the number of mosquitoes killed.

Each point on a scatterplot represents an observation from the dataset, with the x-coordinate corresponding to the pesticide concentration and the y-coordinate to the proportion of mosquitoes killed. For students, this is a practical way to see trends or patterns within their data. It could reveal, for instance, a trend that higher concentrations are associated with more frequent mosquito fatalities. Crafting a scatterplot is the first crucial step in data analysis as it can guide us on what type of statistical methods to use going forward.
Logistic Regression Explained
Now, why would we use logistic regression in a toxicity study? Logistic regression is used when the outcome variable (the proportion of mosquitoes killed, in this case) is binary or categorical. It calculates the probability of a certain event occurring, like how likely mosquitoes are to die at each pesticide concentration.

To employ logistic regression, we first need to transform our raw proportions using the logistic function. This step is crucial to ensure the response variable behaves in a linear fashion relative to the independent variable (pesticide concentration), hence making it appropriate for linear regression analysis.

In our example, the logistic transformation makes the relationship linear so that we can fit a regression line of the form y' = a + b(Concentration). Here, a stands for the y-intercept which gives the baseline log-odds of mosquito death when the pesticide concentration is zero, and b stands for the regression coefficient indicating how the log-odds of death increase with each unit increase in pesticide concentration. A positive slope b in this context indicates that as the concentration increases, the likelihood of mosquito death increases.
Estimating the LD50
Understanding the LD50, or 'Lethal Dose, 50%', is crucial for interpreting toxicity studies like the one we've been discussing. LD50 represents the dose at which a substance is lethal to half of the sample population. Estimating the LD50 helps to gauge the potency and potential risk associated with a substance.

In toxicity studies involving pesticides, researchers are particularly interested in this value as it informs them about the dosage required to achieve the desired pest control without posing excessive risks to other organisms.

To estimate LD50 from logistic regression, after performing the necessary data transformation and fitting the linear model, we set the logit (that is the logistic transformed proportion of the outcome) to zero. This corresponds to a 50% kill rate by definition, hence the term LD50. We then solve for the corresponding pesticide concentration. It’s an intricate dance between biology and statistics that yields insights into the impact and safety of substances used in environments shared by pests and humans alike.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study, described in the paper "Prediction of Defibrillation Success from a Single Defibrillation Threshold Measurement" (Circulation [1988]: \(1144-1149\) ) investigated the relationship between defibrillation success and the energy of the defibrillation shock (expressed as a multiple of the defibrillation threshold) and presented the following data: $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { Energy of Shock } & \text { Success (\%) } \\ \hline 0.5 & 33.3 \\ 1.0 & 58.3 \\ 1.5 & 81.8 \\ 2.0 & 96.7 \\ 2.5 & 100.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of \(y=\) success and \(x=\) energy of shock. Does the relationship appear to be linear or nonlinear? b. Fit a least-squares line to the given data, and construct a residual plot. Does the residual plot support your conclusion in Part (a)? Explain. c. Consider transforming the data by leaving \(y\) unchanged and using either \(x^{\prime}=\sqrt{x}\) or \(x^{\prime \prime}=\log (x)\). Which of these transformations would you recommend? Justify your choice by appealing to appropriate graphical displays. d. Using the transformation you recommended in Part (c), find the equation of the least-squares line that describes the relationship between \(y\) and the transformed \(x\). e. What would you predict success to be when the energy of shock is \(1.75\) times the threshold level? When it is \(0.8\) times the threshold level?

The article "Cost-Effectiveness in Public Education" (Chance [1995]: \(38-41\) ) reported that for a regression of \(y=\) average SAT score on \(x=\) expenditure per pupil, based on data from \(n=44\) New Jersey school districts, \(a=766, b=0.015, r^{2}=.160\), and \(s_{e}=53.7\). a. One observation in the sample was (9900, 893). What average SAT score would you predict for this district, and what is the corresponding residual? b. Interpret the value of \(s_{e}\). c. How effectively do you think the least-squares line summarizes the relationship between \(x\) and \(y ?\) Explain your reasoning.

The article "Reduction in Soluble Protein and Chlorophyll Contents in a Few Plants as Indicators of Automobile Exhaust Pollution" (International Journal of Environmental Studies [1983]: 239-244) reported the following data on \(x=\) distance from a highway (in meters) and \(y=\) lead content of soil at that distance (in parts per million): $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrr} x & 0.3 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 15 & 20 \\ y & 62.75 & 37.51 & 29.70 & 20.71 & 17.65 & 15.41 \\ x & 25 & 30 & 40 & 50 & 75 & 100 \\ y & 14.15 & 13.50 & 12.11 & 11.40 & 10.85 & 10.85 \end{array} $$ a. Use a statistical computer package to construct scatterplots of \(y\) versus \(x, y\) versus \(\log (x), \log (y)\) versus \(\log (x)\) and \(\frac{1}{y}\) versus \(\frac{1}{x}\). b. Which transformation considered in Part (a) does the best job of producing an approximately linear relationship? Use the selected transformation to predict lead content when distance is \(25 \mathrm{~m}\).

The article "That's Rich: More You Drink, More You Earn" (Calgary Herald, April 16,2002 ) reported that there was a positive correlation between alcohol consumption and income. Is it reasonable to conclude that increasing alcohol consumption will increase income? Give at least two reasons or examples to support your answer.

Athletes competing in a triathlon participated in a study described in the paper "Myoglobinemia and Endurance Exercise" (American Journal of Sports Medicine [1984]: 113-118). The following data on finishing time \(x\) (in hours) and myoglobin level \(y\) (in nanograms per milliliter) were read from a scatterplot in the paper: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} x & 4.90 & 4.70 & 5.35 & 5.22 & 5.20 \\ y & 1590 & 1550 & 1360 & 895 & 865 \\ x & 5.40 & 5.70 & 6.00 & 6.20 & 6.10 \\ y & 905 & 895 & 910 & 700 & 675 \\ x & 5.60 & 5.35 & 5.75 & 5.35 & 6.00 \\ y & 540 & 540 & 440 & 380 & 300 \end{array} $$ a. Obtain the equation of the least-squares line. b. Interpret the value of \(b\). c. What happens if the line in Part (a) is used to predict the myoglobin level for a finishing time of \(8 \mathrm{hr}\) ? Is this reasonable? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.