/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 Exercise \(5.22\) gave the least... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercise \(5.22\) gave the least-squares regression line for predicting \(y=\) clutch size from \(x=\) snout-vent length ("Reproductive Biology of the Aquatic Salamander \(A m\) phiuma tridactylum in Louisiana," Journal of Herpetology [1999]: \(100-105\) ). The paper also reported \(r^{2}=.7664\) and \(\mathrm{SSTo}=43,951 .\) a. Interpret the value of \(r^{2}\). b. Find and interpret the value of \(s_{e}\) (the sample size was \(n=14)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
\(r^{2}\) value of .7664 indicates that 76.64% of the variation in clutch size is explained by the snout-vent length. The standard error of the estimate \(s_{e}\) is approximately 62.87 which is the average difference between the actual clutch size and the predicted clutch size.

Step by step solution

01

Interpretation of \(r^{2}\)

\(r^{2}\) is known as the coefficient of determination. The given \(r^{2}\) value of .7664 represents the proportion of the variance for the dependent variable (clutch size) that's explained by the independent variable (snout-vent length). Thus, approximately 76.64% of the variation in clutch size can be explained by the linear relationship with snout-vent length.
02

Calculate \(s_{e}\)

The formula to find the standard error of the estimate \(s_{e}\) is \(\sqrt{\frac{{SST}}{{n-2}} - (\frac{{SSR}}{{n-2}})}\). We don't have the sum of squares of regression (SSR), but we can calculate it from SSR = SST - SSE. The formula for \(r^{2}\) is \( \frac{{SSR}}{{SST}}\), thus we can rearrange it to find SSR = \(r^{2} * SST\). Substituting the given values, we get SSR = 0.7664 * 43951 = 33707.3364. Substituting SSR, SST and n into the formula, we calculate: \(s_{e} = \sqrt{\frac{{43951}}{{14-2}} - \frac{{33707.3364}}{{14-2}}}\) yielding \(s_{e}\) = 62.87.
03

Interpretation of \(s_{e}\)

The calculated standard error of the estimate \(s_{e} = 62.87\) is a measure of the differences between predictions made by the regression line and the actual values. The lower the \(s_{e}\), the more precise the forecast. In this case, the average difference between the actual clutch size and the clutch size predicted by the linear regression line is approximately \(s_{e}\) units, i.e., 62.87 units.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Determination
Understanding the coefficient of determination, commonly denoted as r2, is crucial in the realm of statistics, especially when dealing with regression analysis. Essentially, it quantifies the extent to which the variance of the dependent variable is captured by the model. In simpler terms, it tells us what percentage of the dependent variable's fluctuation can be explained by its relationship with the independent variable(s).

In the case of predicting clutch size (that is, the number of offspring produced at one time) from the snout-vent length in salamanders, an r2 value of 0.7664 indicates that approximately 76.64% of the variance in clutch sizes can be accounted for by their relationship with snout-vent length. This suggests a strong association—knowing the snout-vent length affords us a substantial amount of information about the expected clutch size. However, it is important to note that this does not imply causation. The remaining variance, which amounts to roughly 23.36%, is due to other factors not included in the model or possibly random variation.

Moreover, this high r2 signifies a robust predictive power of the regression model. However, one must also consider other metrics to assess a model's accuracy fully, as a high coefficient of determination alone is not the sole indicator of a good model.
Standard Error of the Estimate
The standard error of the estimate, denoted as se, is a measure that provides insight into the precision of predictions made by a regression line. It represents the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. In other words, it gives us an idea of the scatter of the data points around the fitted line—smaller values of se indicate the data points are closer to the line, implying better predictive accuracy.

Calculating se involves determining the square root of the difference between the total sum of squares (SST) and the sum of squares due to regression (SSR), divided by the degrees of freedom (which, in regression analysis, is the number of observations minus the number of parameters being estimated). From the exercise, with an se of 62.87, we understand that, on average, the actual clutch size varies from what the regression line predicts by about 62.87 units. In practical applications, a smaller se is desirable as it demonstrates that the regression line closely follows the actual data points, implying more reliable predictions. It's important to interpret this value in the context of the scale of the dependent variable—a²Ô se of 62.87 might mean differently for clutch size compared to another measure such as body length, depending on their respective scales and variances.
Variance
Variance is a fundamental concept in statistics used to describe the dispersion of a set of data points around their mean value. It is calculated as the average of the squared differences from the mean. A higher variance indicates that data points spread out more broadly from the mean, whereas a lower variance suggests they are closer to the mean, implying less dispersion.

In the context of regression analysis, we often deal with two types of variance—total variance (SST), which is the overall variability in the dependent variable, and explained variance (SSR), which is the portion of the total variance that is explained by the regression model. The difference between these two, unexplained variance (SSE), represents variability that the model fails to account for.

It's imperative to understand that while variance informs us about the distribution of individual data points, it does not provide details on the direction or the nature of the relationship between variables. For this reason, analysts consider both the variance and the regression coefficients to gauge not just how widely the data vary but also to discern patterns and relationships between variables.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Draw two scatterplots, one for which \(r=1\) and a second for which \(r=-1\).

5.56 The article "Organ Transplant Demand Rises Five Times as Fast as Existing Supply" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, February 23,2001 ) included a graph that showed the number of people waiting for organ transplants each year from 1990 to 1999 . The following data are approximate values and were read from the graph in the article: $$ \begin{array}{lc} & \text { Number Waiting } \\ \text { Year } & \begin{array}{c} \text { for Transplant } \\ \text { (in thousands) } \end{array} \\ \hline 1(1990) & 22 \\ 2 & 25 \\ 3 & 29 \\ 4 & 33 \\ 5 & 38 \\ 6 & 44 \\ 7 & 50 \\ 8 & 57 \\ 9 & 64 \\ 10(1999) & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of the data with \(y=\) number waiting for transplant and \(x=\) year. Describe how the number of people waiting for transplants has changed over time from 1990 to 1999 . b. The scatterplot in Part (a) is shaped like segment 2 in Figure \(5.31\). Find a transformation of \(x\) and/or \(y\) that straightens the plot. Construct a scatterplot for your transformed variables. c. Using the transformed variables from Part (b), fit a least-squares line and use it to predict the number waiting for an organ transplant in 2000 (Year 11). d. The prediction made in Part (c) involves prediction for an \(x\) value that is outside the range of the \(x\) values in the sample. What assumption must you be willing to make for this to be reasonable? Do you think this assumption is reasonable in this case? Would your answer be the same if the prediction had been for the year 2010 rather than 2000? Explain.

An accurate assessment of oxygen consumption provides important information for determining energy expenditure requirements for physically demanding tasks. The paper "Oxygen Consumption During Fire Suppression: Error of Heart Rate Estimation" (Ergonomics [1991]: \(1469-1474\) ) reported on a study in which \(x=\) oxygen consumption (in milliliters per kilogram per minute) during a treadmill test was determined for a sample of 10 firefighters. Then \(y=\) oxygen consumption at a comparable heart rate was measured for each of the 10 individuals while they performed a fire-suppression simulation. This resulted in the following data and scatterplot: $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrr} \text { Firefighter } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ x & 51.3 & 34.1 & 41.1 & 36.3 & 36.5 \\ y & 49.3 & 29.5 & 30.6 & 28.2 & 28.0 \\ \text { Firefighter } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ x & 35.4 & 35.4 & 38.6 & 40.6 & 39.5 \\ y & 26.3 & 33.9 & 29.4 & 23.5 & 31.6 \end{array} $$ a. Does the scatterplot suggest an approximate linear relationship? b. The investigators fit a least-squares line. The resulting MINITAB output is given in the following:. Predict fire-simulation consumption when treadmill consumption is 40 . c. How effectively does a straight line summarize the relationship? d. Delete the first observation, \((51.3,49.3)\), and calculate the new equation of the least-squares line and the value of \(r^{2}\). What do you conclude? (Hint: For the original data, \(\sum x=388.8, \Sigma y=310.3, \sum x^{2}=15,338.54, \sum x y=\) \(12,306.58\), and \(\sum y^{2}=10,072.41\).)

The paper "Biomechanical Characteristics of the Final Approach Step, Hurdle, and Take-Off of Elite American Springboard Divers" (Journal of Human Movement Studies [1984]: 189-212) gave the following data on \(y=\) judge's score and \(x=\) length of final step (in meters) for a sample of seven divers performing a forward pike with a single somersault: $$ \begin{array}{cccccccc} y & 7.40 & 9.10 & 7.20 & 7.00 & 7.30 & 7.30 & 7.90 \\ x & 1.17 & 1.17 & 0.93 & 0.89 & 0.68 & 0.74 & 0.95 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot. b. Calculate the slope and intercept of the least-squares line. Draw this line on your scatterplot. c. Calculate and interpret the value of Pearson's sample correlation coefficient.

The relationship between hospital patient-to-nurse ratio and various characteristics of job satisfaction and patient care has been the focus of a number of research studies. Suppose \(x=\) patient-to-nurse ratio is the predictor variable. For each of the following potential dependent variables, indicate whether you expect the slope of the least-squares line to be positive or negative and give a brief explanation for your choice. a. \(y=\) a measure of nurse's job satisfaction (higher values indicate higher satisfaction) b. \(y=\) a measure of patient satisfaction with hospital care (higher values indicate higher satisfaction) c. \(y=\) a measure of patient quality of care.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.