/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 5.56 The article "Organ Transpla... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

5.56 The article "Organ Transplant Demand Rises Five Times as Fast as Existing Supply" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, February 23,2001 ) included a graph that showed the number of people waiting for organ transplants each year from 1990 to 1999 . The following data are approximate values and were read from the graph in the article: $$ \begin{array}{lc} & \text { Number Waiting } \\ \text { Year } & \begin{array}{c} \text { for Transplant } \\ \text { (in thousands) } \end{array} \\ \hline 1(1990) & 22 \\ 2 & 25 \\ 3 & 29 \\ 4 & 33 \\ 5 & 38 \\ 6 & 44 \\ 7 & 50 \\ 8 & 57 \\ 9 & 64 \\ 10(1999) & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of the data with \(y=\) number waiting for transplant and \(x=\) year. Describe how the number of people waiting for transplants has changed over time from 1990 to 1999 . b. The scatterplot in Part (a) is shaped like segment 2 in Figure \(5.31\). Find a transformation of \(x\) and/or \(y\) that straightens the plot. Construct a scatterplot for your transformed variables. c. Using the transformed variables from Part (b), fit a least-squares line and use it to predict the number waiting for an organ transplant in 2000 (Year 11). d. The prediction made in Part (c) involves prediction for an \(x\) value that is outside the range of the \(x\) values in the sample. What assumption must you be willing to make for this to be reasonable? Do you think this assumption is reasonable in this case? Would your answer be the same if the prediction had been for the year 2010 rather than 2000? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The number of people waiting for organ transplants has shown an increasing trend from 1990 to 1999. After transforming the data using a logarithmic function, a least-squares line was fitted to predict future data. The prediction for 2000 would be calculated from this line's equation. It is important to note that this prediction assumes unchanged influencing factors and the continuation of past trends, which may not always be accurate, especially for predictions far into the future.

Step by step solution

01

Construct Scatterplot

Plot data points on a graph with year as the independent variable \(x\) and number waiting for transplant as dependent variable \(y\). Each year value should correspond to the number of people waiting for transplants that year.
02

Describe Trends

Review the scatterplot made. You may notice that the number of people waiting for organ transplants has generally increased over the observed decade.
03

Transform the Scatterplot

Identifying that the scatterplot shows a nonlinear growth trend, we can transform the data using a logarithmic function to straighten the curve into a line. Apply logarithmic function on the \(y\) variables only, creating a new scatterplot with \(x\) = year, \(y' = \ln(y)\) where \(y'\) is the transformed y-variable.
04

Fit a Least-Squares Line and Prediction

Perform a linear regression on the transformed data to fit a least-squares line. The equation of the least-squares line can now be used to predict the number of individuals waiting for organ transplantation in 2000 (Year 11). This could be done by substituting \(x = 11\) into the equation.
05

Discuss Predictive Assumptions

Recognize that the prediction for year 2000 assumes that the past trend will continue into the future. Consequently, it also assumes that the factors influencing the demand for organ transplants over the past years remain the same. Reflect on whether this assumption is reasonable or not. The validity of this prediction would probably decrease for significantly far future years like 2010 since many societal and medical factors can change over a longer period of time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Organ Transplant Statistics
Understanding organ transplant statistics is crucial when analyzing healthcare data and predicting future trends. In our case, we look at the number of people waiting for organ transplants from 1990 to 1999. Through constructing a scatterplot, we can visually discern the trend of this medical necessity. A clear upward trend over this decade indicates a growing gap between supply and demand in organ transplants. This type of data is essential for health care providers, policymakers, and researchers as it helps them to allocate resources, plan for future needs, and assess the effectiveness of public health initiatives.

It's of particular interest to note the social and technical factors contributing to these trends, such as advancements in medical technology, changes in organ donation policies, or public awareness campaigns. The implications of such statistics are profound, potentially influencing legislation and ethical debates surrounding organ donation and transplantation.
Data Transformation
When we talk about data transformation, we refer to the application of a mathematical modification to the data in order to simplify the underlying relationship for analysis. In the context of organ transplant statistics, the data transformation might be used to straighten a nonlinear relationship in a scatterplot. For instance, applying a logarithmic function—which is a common transformation to address exponential growth—transforms curved data into a linear form that is more amenable to analysis with tools like linear regression.

Data transformation is not only a key technique for simplifying the visualization of trends but also for stabilizing variance, normalizing data, and making it suitable for predictive modeling. It's a fundamental skill for anyone delving into statistical analysis, as it can reveal relationships that might otherwise be obscured in the raw data.
Least-Squares Regression
The method of least-squares regression is a statistical procedure used to find the line that best fits a set of data points. This technique minimizes the sum of the squares of the vertical deviations from each data point to the line. In the organ transplant example, after transforming our data, we use least-squares regression on the transformed variables to create a predictable and understandable relationship between years and the number of patients waiting for transplants.

By finding the equation of the best-fit line, we can make predictions about future values—given that the underlying assumptions hold true. Least-squares regression is widely used in various fields, from economics to engineering, making it an indispensable tool for predicting future outcomes based on historical data.
Extrapolation Assumptions
When we project beyond the range of our original data using a predictive model, we engage in extrapolation. This process is based on the assumption that the patterns observed in the past will continue unchanged into the future. In the scenario of predicting the number of individuals waiting for an organ transplant in 2000, which is beyond our dataset's range, we are relying on this assumption.

However, caution is key. The further we extrapolate, the less reliable our predictions become, as unforeseeable changes can alter the trend. Factors such as policy changes, medical advancements, or demographic shifts may invalidate our assumptions. Therefore, while extrapolation is a valuable tool for short-term forecasts, its assumptions must be carefully considered and questioned for long-term predictions, like for the year 2010, in our organ transplant statistics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cost-to-charge ratio (the percentage of the amount billed that represents the actual cost) for inpatient and outpatient services at 11 Oregon hospitals is shown in the following table (Oregon Department of Health Services, 2002). A scatterplot of the data is also shown. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \text { Hospital } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Outpatient } \\ \text { Care } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Inpatient } \\ \text { Care } \end{array} \\ \hline 1 & 62 & 80 \\ 2 & 66 & 76 \\ 3 & 63 & 75 \\ 4 & 51 & 62 \\ 5 & 75 & 100 \\ 6 & 65 & 88 \\ 7 & 56 & 64 \\ 8 & 45 & 50 \\ 9 & 48 & 54 \\ 10 & 71 & 83 \\ 11 & 54 & 100 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The least-squares regression line with \(y=\) inpatient costto-charge ratio and \(x=\) outpatient cost-to-charge ratio is \(\hat{y}=-1.1+1.29 x\). a. Is the observation for Hospital 11 an influential observation? Justify your answer. b. Is the observation for Hospital 11 an outlier? Explain. c. Is the observation for Hospital 5 an influential observation? Justify your answer. d. Is the observation for Hospital 5 an outlier? Explain.

The sales manager of a large company selected a random sample of \(n=10\) salespeople and determined for each one the values of \(x=\) years of sales experience and \(y=\) annual sales (in thousands of dollars). A scatterplot of the resulting \((x, y)\) pairs showed a marked linear pattern. a. Suppose that the sample correlation coefficient is \(r=\) \(.75\) and that the average annual sales is \(\bar{y}=100\). If a particular salesperson is 2 standard deviations above the mean in terms of experience, what would you predict for that person's annual sales? b. If a particular person whose sales experience is \(1.5\) standard deviations below the average experience is predicted to have an annual sales value that is 1 standard deviation below the average annual sales, what is the value of \(r ?\)

The following table gives the number of organ transplants performed in the United States each year from 1990 to 1999 (The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, 2003): $$ \begin{array}{cc} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Number of } \\ \text { Transplants } \\ \text { Year } \end{array} & \text { (in thousands) } \\ \hline 1(1990) & 15.0 \\ 2 & 15.7 \\ 3 & 16.1 \\ 4 & 17.6 \\ 5 & 18.3 \\ 6 & 19.4 \\ 7 & 20.0 \\ 8 & 20.3 \\ 9 & 21.4 \\ 10 \text { (1999) } & 21.8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of these data, and then find the equation of the least-squares regression line that describes the relationship between \(y=\) number of transplants performed and \(x=\) year. Describe how the number of transplants performed has changed over time from 1990 to 1999 . b. Compute the 10 residuals, and construct a residual plot. Are there any features of the residual plot that indicate that the relationship between year and number of transplants performed would be better described by a curve rather than a line? Explain.

The paper "A Cross-National Relationship Betwee Sugar Consumption and Major Depression?" (Depression and Anxiety [2002]: \(118-120\) ) concluded that there was a correlation between refined sugar consumption (calories per person per day) and annual rate of major depression (cases per 100 people) based on data from 6 countries. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Country } & \text { Consumption Rate } \\ \hline \text { Korea } & 150 & 2.3 \\ \text { United States } & 300 & 3.0 \\ \text { France } & 350 & 4.4 \\ \text { Germany } & 375 & 5.0 \\ \text { Canada } & 390 & 5.2 \\ \text { New Zealand } & 480 & 5.7 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Compute and interpret the correlation coefficient for this data set. b. Is it reasonable to conclude that increasing sugar consumption leads to higher rates of depression? Explain. c. Do you have any concerns about this study that would make you hesitant to generalize these conclusions to other countries?

Cost-to-charge ratios (the percentage of the amount billed that represents the actual cost) for 11 Oregon hospitals of similar size were reported separately for inpatient and outpatient services. The data are $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Hospital } & \text { Inpatient } & \text { Outpatient } \\ \hline \text { Blue Mountain } & 80 & 62 \\ \text { Curry General } & 76 & 66 \\ \text { Good Shepherd } & 75 & 63 \\ \text { Grande Ronde } & 62 & 51 \\ \text { Harney District } & 100 & 54 \\ \text { Lake District } & 100 & 75 \\ \text { Pioneer } & 88 & 65 \\ \text { St. Anthony } & 64 & 56 \\ \text { St. Elizabeth } & 50 & 45 \\ \text { Tillamook } & 54 & 48 \\ \text { Wallowa Memorial } & 83 & 71 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Does there appear to be a strong linear relationship between the cost-to- charge ratio for inpatient and outpatient services? Justify your answer based on the value of the correlation coefficient and examination of a scatterplot of the data. b. Are any unusual features of the data evident in the scatterplot? c. Suppose that the observation for Harney District was removed from the data set. Would the correlation coefficient for the new data set be greater than or less than the one computed in Part (a)? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.