/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 58 A study of more than 50,000 U.S.... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A study of more than 50,000 U.S. nurses found that those who drank just one soda or fruit punch a day tended to gain much more weight and had an \(80 \%\) increased risk in developing diabetes compared to those who drank less than one a month. (The Washington Post, August 25 , 2004). "The message is clear.... Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages" said Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public Health who helped conduct the study. The sugar and beverage industries said that the study was fundamentally flawed. "These allegations are inflammatory. Women who drink a lot of soda may simply have generally unhealthy lifestyles" said Richard Adamson of the American Beverage Association. a. Do you think that the study described was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that drinking soda or fruit punch causes the observed increased risk of diabetes? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The described study is an observational study since the researchers did not manipulate any variables but merely observed the outcomes. It is unreasonable to conclude that drinking soda or fruit punch directly causes an increased risk of diabetes, as the given study doesn't control for potential confounding factors. While a correlation is visible, further studies would be necessary to establish a direct causal relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the type of study

To determine whether this was an observational study or an experiment, we need to look at the characteristics of each. If the researchers manipulated a variable (like soda intake) and then measured the outcome, it would be an experiment. According to the provided information, the researchers studied the connections between soda consumption, weight gain, and diabetes risks without directly manipulating the amount of soda the nurses consumed. So, this is an observational study.
02

Determining causal relationships

When interpreting data from an observational study, it's important to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Even though there's a strong association between soda consumption and diabetes risk, a direct cause-effect relationship cannot be confidently inferred from the data of an observational study alone. Other potential confounding variables must be considered, like overall diet or genetic predisposition. In this context, while it is plausible that soda consumption might contribute to diabetes risk, it wouldn't be scientifically rigorous to conclude that soda consumption directly causes diabetes based on this study alone.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation vs Causation
There is a common misconception that if two things are correlated, one must cause the other. However, that's not always the case, especially in observational studies. Imagine you notice that people who carry umbrellas also tend to wear coats. It would be faulty to say that umbrellas cause people to wear coats. Correlation just means there is a relationship or pattern between two variables, not that one must cause the other. In the study about soda consumption and diabetes, researchers found a correlation between the two, meaning they often occur together.
This does not mean soda consumption causes diabetes. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires more rigorous evidence, often through controlled experiments where other variables are ruled out. Hence, even if nurses who drank soda showed higher diabetes risk, the study alone can't prove soda is the cause of diabetes. It highlights a potential link worth exploring further but isn't enough to establish a causative chain.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are pesky elements that can cloud the true relationship between studied variables. They are like invisible threads that may connect the behavior of two factors without a real direct link. Say we find that people who eat more ice cream tend to have higher sunburn rates. Here, the confounding variable is likely summer heat, which boosts ice cream sales and time spent outside, leading to sunburn.
In the soda study, there could be numerous lurking confounders. For example, nurses consuming more sugar-laden drinks might have other common lifestyle habits. Perhaps they also eat more fast food or exercise less often. Genetics may play a role too; some people are more predisposed to diabetes regardless of their soda intake. Such variables need careful consideration when interpreting results since they can severely skew the conclusions if not properly accounted for.
Diabetes Risk Factors
Diabetes is influenced by a multitude of risk factors, not just sugary drinks or poor diets. Recognizing these factors can guide better personal choices and policy decisions. Common risk factors include:
  • Genetics: A family history of diabetes can increase your likelihood significantly.
  • Poor Diet: High consumption of refined sugars and fats can contribute to insulin resistance.
  • Lack of Exercise: Regular physical activity helps regulate weight and blood sugar levels.
  • Obesity: Being overweight, particularly with central obesity (around the waist), is heavily linked to diabetes.
  • Age: Older age increases diabetes risk as the body's ability to process insulin may decline.
In the nurses' study, while sugary drinks might be a risk factor, they are part of a bigger picture. Addressing diabetes requires a comprehensive approach, considering dietary patterns, activity levels, and broader lifestyle habits.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A pollster for the Public Policy Institute of California explains how the Institute selects a sample of California adults ("It's About Quality, Not Quantity," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 21,2000 ): That is done by using computer-generated random residential telephone numbers with all California prefixes, and when there are no answers, calling back repeatedly to the original numbers selected to avoid a bias against hard-to- reach people. Once a call is completed, a second random selection is made by asking for the adult in the household who had the most recent birthday. It is as important to randomize who you speak to in the household as it is to randomize the household you select. If you didn't, you'd primarily get women and older people. Comment on this approach to selecting a sample. How does the sampling procedure attempt to minimize certain types of bias? Are there sources of bias that may still be a concern?

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania suggest that a nasal spray derived from pheromones (chemicals emitted by animals when they are trying to attract a mate) may be beneficial in relieving symptoms of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) (Los Angeles Times, January 17, 2003 ). a. Describe how you might design an experiment using 100 female volunteers who suffer from PMS to determine whether the nasal spray reduces PMS symptoms. b. Does your design from Part (a) include a placebo treatment? Why or why not? c. Does your design from Part (a) involve blinding? Is it single-blind or double-blind? Explain.

Pismo Beach, California, has an annual clam festival that includes a clam chowder contest. Judges rate clam chowders from local restaurants, and the judging is done in such a way that the judges are not aware of which chowder is from which restaurant. One year, much to the dismay of the seafood restaurants on the waterfont, Denny's chowder was declared the winner! (When asked what the ingredients were, the cook at Denny's said he wasn't sure- he just had to add the right amount of nondairy creamer to the soup stock that he got from Denny's distribution center!) a. Do you think that Denny's chowder would have won the contest if the judging had not been "blind"? Explain. b. Although this was not an experiment, your answer to Part (a) helps to explain why those measuring the response in an experiment are often blinded. Using your

Based on a survey of 4113 U.S. adults, researchers at Stanford University concluded that Internet use leads to increased social isolation. The survey was conducted by an Internet-based polling company that selected its samples from a pool of 35,000 potential respondents, all of whom had been given free Internet access and WebTV hardware in exchange for agreeing to regularly participate in surveys conducted by the polling company. Two criticisms of this study were expressed in an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (February 28,2000 ). The first criticism was that increased social isolation was measured by asking respondents if they were talking less to family and friends on the phone. The second criticism was that the sample was selected only from a group that was induced to participate by the offer of free Internet service, yet the results were generalized to all U.S. adults. For each criticism, indicate what type of bias is being described and why it might make you question the conclusion drawn by the researchers.

According to the article "Effect of Preparation Methods on Total Fat Content, Moisture Content, and Sensory Characteristics of Breaded Chicken Nuggets and Beef Steak Fingers" (Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal \([1999]: 18-27)\), sensory tests were conducted using 40 college student volunteers at Texas Women's University. Give three reasons, apart from the relatively small sample size, why this sample may not be ideal as the basis for generalizing to the population of all college students.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.