/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 Consider the accompanying data o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the accompanying data on plant growth after the application of different types of growth hormone. $$ \begin{array}{llrlrl} & \mathbf{1} & 13 & 17 & 7 & 14 \\ & \mathbf{2} & 21 & 13 & 20 & 17 \\ \text { Hormone } & \mathbf{3} & 18 & 14 & 17 & 21 \\ & \mathbf{4} & 7 & 11 & 18 & 10 \\ & \mathbf{5} & 6 & 11 & 15 & 8 \end{array} $$ a. Carry out the \(F\) test at level \(\alpha=.05\). b. What happens when the T-K procedure is applied? (Note: This "contradiction" can occur when \(H_{0}\) is "barely" rejected. It happens because the test and the multiple comparison method are based on different distributions. Consult your friendly neighborhood statistician for more information.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The F test and Tukey-Kramer procedure are used for hypothesis tests related to difference among group means. The results from the F test will indicate if there is evidence to suggest that at least one hormone mean is different from the others, while the T-K procedure acts as a post-hoc test used to identify which specific means are different.

Step by step solution

01

- Calculating Group and Total Means

Compute the mean growth for each hormone type, and the overall mean growth across all the plant observations.
02

- Calculating Sums of Squares

Compute the within-groups sum of squares (SSW) and between-groups sum of squares (SSB) using the hormone means and overall mean.
03

- Calculating Degrees of Freedom

Get the degrees of freedom for the numerator (df1) and the denominator (df2) for the F test. This can be calculated by subtracting 1 from the number of hormone types for df1, and subtracting the number of hormone types from the total number of values for df2.
04

- Performing the F test

Use the SSB, SSW, df1 and df2 to compute the F statistic.\nIf the calculated F statistic is greater than the critical F value (found by looking it up in an F-distribution table with α = .05, df1 and df2), reject the null hypothesis that all the hormones have the same mean effect on plant growth.
05

- Applying the Tukey-Kramer procedure

If the null hypothesis was rejected, perform the T-K procedure to conduct pairwise comparisons between the hormone means to see which ones differ from each other.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F test
The F test is a statistical method used to determine if there are significant differences between group means. In the context of ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), this test evaluates whether the means of different groups (such as the effect of different hormones on plant growth) differ more than expected by random chance.

Here's how the process works:
  • First, we calculate the **between-group variability** and the **within-group variability**. These provide an idea of how much the data vary due to the treatment versus random variation.
  • The F statistic is then calculated by dividing the between-group variability by the within-group variability.
  • If the F statistic is higher than the critical value from the F-distribution table (based on our chosen significance level \(\alpha = 0.05\), and the degrees of freedom), we reject the null hypothesis.
This rejection indicates a significant difference between the group means. In the context of this exercise, you'd use data from plant growth to compute your F statistic.
Tukey-Kramer procedure
After the F test confirms at least one significant difference among the group means, the Tukey-Kramer procedure helps identify which groups differ. This is important because the F test only tells us that a difference exists, not its source.

The Tukey-Kramer method carries out all possible pairwise comparisons between group means while controlling for Type I errors (incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis). Key points of this procedure include:
  • Calculate the difference between each pair of group means.
  • Compare these differences to a critical value that considers the sample sizes involved.
  • If a difference exceeds the critical value, that pair is considered significantly different.
Remember, this procedure is particularly useful because it provides a detailed picture of how group means compare to each other in a multiple comparisons scenario.
Sums of Squares
In ANOVA, the Sums of Squares help quantify the variation in the data, partitioning it into components that help us understand the source of variability. There are two main types of Sums of Squares in this context:
  • **Sum of Squares Between (SSB):** This measures variability due to the interaction between different groups, like the different hormone treatments. It's based on how much each group's mean deviates from the overall mean. The larger this value, the more potential there is that the group means are different.
  • **Sum of Squares Within (SSW):** This measures variability within each group, indicative of natural variation. It checks how individuals deviate from their group mean. Larger values indicate more variation due to factors other than the group intervention.
Together, SSB and SSW are used to formulate the F statistic, providing the foundation for testing the hypothesis of ANOVA.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of Freedom (df) are crucial in statistics for estimating variability, which are particularly important in hypothesis testing. In ANOVA, they determine the specific F distribution you should use to find your critical value.

Here's how to calculate them:
  • **Degrees of Freedom Between (df1):** Calculated as the number of groups minus one. For example, if there are 5 types of hormones, df1 would be 4.
  • **Degrees of Freedom Within (df2):** Calculated as the total number of observations minus the number of groups. If there are 20 observations across the 5 groups, then df2 would be 15.
Degrees of Freedom impact the shape of the F distribution and are imperative in determining whether your F statistic falls in the critical region, allowing you to make inferences about your hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a random sample of size \(n=5\) was selected from the vineyard properties for sale in Sonoma County, California, in each of three years. The following data are consistent with summary information on price per acre (in dollars, rounded to the nearest thousand) for disease-resistant grape vineyards in Sonoma County (Wines and Vines, November 1999). $$ \begin{array}{llllll} 1996 & 30,000 & 34,000 & 36,000 & 38,000 & 40,000 \\ 1997 & 30,000 & 35,000 & 37,000 & 38,000 & 40,000 \\ 1998 & 40,000 & 41,000 & 43,000 & 44,000 & 50,000 \end{array} $$ a. Construct boxplots for each of the three years on a common axis, and label each by year. Comment on the similarities and differences. b. Carry out an ANOVA to determine whether there is evidence to support the claim that the mean price per acre for vineyard land in Sonoma County was not the same for the three years considered. Use a significance level of \(.05\) for your test.

Employees of a certain state university system can choose from among four different health plans. Each plan differs somewhat from the others in terms of hospitalization coverage. Four samples of recently hospitalized individuals were selected, each sample consisting of people covered by a different health plan. The length of the hospital stay (number of days) was determined for each individual selected. a. What hypotheses would you test to decide whether average length of stay was related to health plan? (Note: Carefully define the population characteristics of interest.) b. If each sample consisted of eight individuals and the value of the ANOVA \(F\) statistic was \(F=4.37\), what conclusion would be appropriate for a test with \(\alpha=.01 ?\) c. Answer the question posed in Part (b) if the \(F\) value given there resulted from sample sizes \(n_{1}=9, n_{2}=8\), \(n_{3}=7\), and \(n_{4}=8\).

The nutritional quality of shrubs commonly used for feed by rabbits was the focus of a study summarized in the article "Estimation of Browse by Size Classes for Snowshoe Hare" (Journal of Wildlife Management [1980]: 34-40). The energy content (cal/g) of three sizes ( \(4 \mathrm{~mm}\) or less, \(5-7 \mathrm{~mm}\), and \(8-10 \mathrm{~mm}\) ) of serviceberries was studied. Let \(\mu_{1}, \mu_{2}\), and \(\mu_{3}\) denote the true energy content for the three size classes. Suppose that \(95 \%\) simultaneous confidence intervals for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}, \mu_{1}-\mu_{3}\), and \(\mu_{2}-\mu_{3}\) are \((-10,290),(150,450)\), and \((10,310)\), respectively. How would you interpret these intervals?

15.19 The Gunning Fog index is a measure of reading difficulty based on the average number of words per sentence and the percentage of words with three or more syllables. High values of the Gunning Fog index are associated with difficult reading levels. Independent random samples of six advertisements were taken from three different magazines, and Gunning Fog indices were computed to obtain the data given in the accompanying table ("Readability Levels of Magazine Advertisements"'Journal of Advertising Research [1981]: 45-50). Construct an ANOVA table, and then use a significance level of .01 to test the null hypothesis of no difference between the mean Gunning Fog index levels for advertisements appearing in the three magazines. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \text { Scientific American } & 15.75 & 11.55 & 11.16 & 9.92 & 9.23 & 8.20 \\ \text { Fortune } & 12.63 & 11.46 & 10.77 & 9.93 & 9.87 & 9.42 \\ \text { New Yorker } & 9.27 & 8.28 & 8.15 & 6.37 & 6.37 & 5.66 \end{array} $$

Parents are frequently concerned when their child seems slow to begin walking (although when the child finally walks, the resulting havoc sometimes has the parents wishing they could turn back the clock!). The article "Walking in the Newborn" (Science, 176 [1972]: 314-315) reported on an experiment in which the effects of several different treatments on the age at which a child first walks were compared. Children in the first group were given special walking exercises for 12 min per day beginning at age 1 week and lasting 7 weeks. The second group of children received daily exercises but not the walking exercises administered to the first group. The third and fourth groups were control groups: They received no special treatment and differed only in that the third group's progress was checked weekly, whereas the fourth group's progress was checked just once at the end of the study. Observations on age (in months) when the children first walked are shown in the accompanying table. Also given is the ANOVA table, obtained from the SPSS computer package. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrr} & & \text { Age } & & n & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Treatment 1 } & 9.00 & 9.50 & 9.75 & 6 & 60.75 \\ & 10.00 & 13.00 & 9.50 & & \\ \text { Treatment 2 } & 11.00 & 10.00 & 10.00 & 6 & 68.25 \\ & 11.75 & 10.50 & 15.00 & & \\ \text { Treatment 3 } & 11.50 & 12.00 & 9.00 & 6 & 70.25 \\ & 11.50 & 13.25 & 13.00 & & \\ \text { Treatment 4 } & 13.25 & 11.50 & 12.00 & 5 & 61.75 \\ & 13.50 & 11.50 & & & \\ & & & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Analysis of Variance \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { df } & \text { Sum of sq. } & \text { Mean Sq. } & \text { F Ratio } & \text { F Prob } \\ \text { Between Groups } & 3 & 14.778 & 4.926 & 2.142 & .129 \\ \text { Within Groups } & 19 & 43.690 & 2.299 & & \\ \text { Total } & 22 & 58.467 & & & \end{array}\) a. Verify the entries in the ANOVA table. b. State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.