/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 15.19 The Gunning Fog index is a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

15.19 The Gunning Fog index is a measure of reading difficulty based on the average number of words per sentence and the percentage of words with three or more syllables. High values of the Gunning Fog index are associated with difficult reading levels. Independent random samples of six advertisements were taken from three different magazines, and Gunning Fog indices were computed to obtain the data given in the accompanying table ("Readability Levels of Magazine Advertisements"'Journal of Advertising Research [1981]: 45-50). Construct an ANOVA table, and then use a significance level of .01 to test the null hypothesis of no difference between the mean Gunning Fog index levels for advertisements appearing in the three magazines. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \text { Scientific American } & 15.75 & 11.55 & 11.16 & 9.92 & 9.23 & 8.20 \\ \text { Fortune } & 12.63 & 11.46 & 10.77 & 9.93 & 9.87 & 9.42 \\ \text { New Yorker } & 9.27 & 8.28 & 8.15 & 6.37 & 6.37 & 5.66 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given data, and following the above procedures, the null hypothesis can either be accepted or rejected. The specific result depends on the p-value calculated from the F-statistic, which then gets compared with the given significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Collect & Compute Key Statistics

First, collect all the given values from three magazines and calculate their mean values. \(\bar{X}_{SA} = \frac{15.75 + 11.55 + 11.16 + 9.92 + 9.23 + 8.2}{6} \approx 11.13\), \(\bar{X}_{F} = \frac{12.63 + 11.46 + 10.77 + 9.93 + 9.87 + 9.42}{6} \approx 10.58\) and \(\bar{X}_{NY} = \frac{9.27 + 8.28 + 8.15 + 6.37 + 6.37 + 5.66}{6} \approx 7.35\). Moreover, find the overall mean, \(\bar{X}_{total} = \frac{11.13 + 10.58 + 7.35}{3} \approx 9.68\).
02

Calculate The Sum of Squares

Compute the Sum of Squares Between (SSB) and Sum of Squares Within (SSW). SSB involves the differences of means of each group to the total mean while SSW focuses on the differences within each group. Formulas for these are \(SSB = n_1(\bar{X}_{1} - \bar{X}_{total})^2 + n_2(\bar{X}_{2} - \bar{X}_{total})^2 + n_3(\bar{X}_{3} - \bar{X}_{total})^2\) and \(SSW = \Sigma (X_{i1} - \bar{X}_{1})^2 + \Sigma(X_{i2} - \bar{X}_{2})^2 + \Sigma(X_{i3} - \bar{X}_{3})^2\). Calculate these using the collected means and given samples.
03

Find the Degrees of Freedom and Mean Squares

Find the degrees of freedom, which for Between (dfB) is \(k - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2\) and for Within (dfW) is \(N - k = 18 - 3 = 15\). Later, use these to calculate Mean Square Between (MSB) and Mean Square Within (MSW). These are the ratio of SSB and SSW to their respective degrees of freedom, i.e., \(MSB = SSB/dfB\) and \(MSW = SSW/dfW\).
04

Calculate the F-statistic and Find the P-Value

Calculate the F-statistic by dividing MSB by MSW, i.e., \(F = MSB/MSW\). The F-statistic is the ratio of the variance between groups to the variance within groups. Use this value to find the p-value from an F-distribution table.
05

Decide the Hypothesis Test

Lastly, compare the p-value we got from the F-distribution table with the given significance level (0.01). If the P-value is less than the significance level, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise fail to reject the null hypothesis. That is, if P < 0.01, we conclude that there is a significant difference among the mean Gunning Fog index values of advertisements in the three magazines, else there is no significant difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gunning Fog Index
The Gunning Fog Index is a popular metric used to determine the reading difficulty of a text. This index measures the complexity by taking into account two main factors: the average number of words per sentence and the percentage of complex words, which are words with three or more syllables.
The formula to calculate the Gunning Fog Index is given by: \[ GFI = 0.4 \times \left( \text{Average Sentence Length} + \text{Percentage of Complex Words} \right) \] High values on the Gunning Fog Index indicate text that is difficult to read, suggesting it is best suited for advanced readers. Conversely, lower values indicate that the text is easier to read and comprehend. This metric helps writers and content creators adjust their language to suit their target audience's reading capability.
Reading Difficulty
The concept of reading difficulty refers to how challenging a text is for a reader to understand. Various factors influence reading difficulty, including vocabulary, sentence length, and structure. More complex vocabulary and longer sentences usually increase difficulty, while simpler language and shorter sentences reduce it.
  • **Vocabulary**: Words with three or more syllables are considered complex and can impact a text's readability.
  • **Sentence Length**: Longer sentences can be more challenging to follow since they might contain complex ideas and multiple clauses.
  • **Text Structure**: The organization and flow of a text also contribute to how readable it is, affecting how ideas are connected and understood.
Understanding reading difficulty is essential in fields such as education and communication, ensuring information is accessible to the intended audience.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a method used to make inferences or decisions about a population based on sample data. It involves comparing a null hypothesis, which asserts no effect or no difference, against an alternative hypothesis, which suggests the presence of an effect or a difference. In the context of ANOVA used in the exercise, we are testing if there is no significant difference between means of groups.
**Key Steps Involved in Hypothesis Testing:**
  • **State the Hypotheses**: Define both null and alternative hypotheses. For the exercise, the null hypothesis is that the mean Gunning Fog Index is the same across advertisements from the three magazines.
  • **Choose a Significance Level**: Often represented as \(\alpha\), common levels are 0.05 or 0.01. In this case, 0.01 is used.
  • **Calculate Test Statistic**: Using collected data to compute a value such as \(F\), which can determine the likelihood that any observed differences are due to random chance.
  • **Decision Rule**: Determine whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis by comparing the p-value to the significance level.
By following these steps, conclusions can be drawn about population parameters.
Multiple Group Comparison
When dealing with multiple groups, as in this exercise with advertisement data from three different magazines, comparing their means effectively can reveal significant insights. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) is a statistical tool specifically designed for multiple group comparisons.
**Why Use ANOVA?**
  • **Efficiency**: Instead of performing multiple pairwise tests, ANOVA simultaneously evaluates all group means. This saves time and reduces the likelihood of making a Type I error (false positive).
  • **Statistical Insight**: It helps to understand if at least one group mean significantly differs from the others, without specifying which one.
  • **Complex Analyses**: Ideal for experiments or studies involving multiple factors or treatments to assess their effects.
  • Performing an ANOVA test would involve calculating variances between group means and within group observations and then interpreting the resulting \(F\)-statistic to see if there is a significant difference between groups.

    One App. One Place for Learning.

    All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

    Get started for free

    Most popular questions from this chapter

    Suppose that a random sample of size \(n=5\) was selected from the vineyard properties for sale in Sonoma County, California, in each of three years. The following data are consistent with summary information on price per acre (in dollars, rounded to the nearest thousand) for disease-resistant grape vineyards in Sonoma County (Wines and Vines, November 1999). $$ \begin{array}{llllll} 1996 & 30,000 & 34,000 & 36,000 & 38,000 & 40,000 \\ 1997 & 30,000 & 35,000 & 37,000 & 38,000 & 40,000 \\ 1998 & 40,000 & 41,000 & 43,000 & 44,000 & 50,000 \end{array} $$ a. Construct boxplots for each of the three years on a common axis, and label each by year. Comment on the similarities and differences. b. Carry out an ANOVA to determine whether there is evidence to support the claim that the mean price per acre for vineyard land in Sonoma County was not the same for the three years considered. Use a significance level of \(.05\) for your test.

    Exercise \(15.8\) presented the accompanying summary information on satisfaction levels for employees on three different work schedules: $$ \begin{array}{lll} n_{1}=24 & n_{2}=24 & n_{3}=20 \\ \bar{x}_{1}=6.60 & \bar{x}_{2}=5.37 & \bar{x}_{3}=5.20 \end{array} $$ MSE was computed to be 2.028. Calculate the \(95 \%\) T-K intervals, and identify any significant differences.

    Give as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for an upper-tailed \(F\) test in each of the following situations. a. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15, F=5.37\) b. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15, F=1.90\) c. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15, F=4.89\) d. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20, F=14.48\) e. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20, F=2.69\) f. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=50, F=3.24\)

    Employees of a certain state university system can choose from among four different health plans. Each plan differs somewhat from the others in terms of hospitalization coverage. Four samples of recently hospitalized individuals were selected, each sample consisting of people covered by a different health plan. The length of the hospital stay (number of days) was determined for each individual selected. a. What hypotheses would you test to decide whether average length of stay was related to health plan? (Note: Carefully define the population characteristics of interest.) b. If each sample consisted of eight individuals and the value of the ANOVA \(F\) statistic was \(F=4.37\), what conclusion would be appropriate for a test with \(\alpha=.01 ?\) c. Answer the question posed in Part (b) if the \(F\) value given there resulted from sample sizes \(n_{1}=9, n_{2}=8\), \(n_{3}=7\), and \(n_{4}=8\).

    An investigation carried out to study the toxic effects of mercury was described in the article "Comparative Responses of the Action of Different Mercury Compounds on Barley" (International Journal of Environmental Studies [1983]: 323-327). Ten different concentrations of mercury \((0,1,5,10,50,100,200,300,400\), and \(500 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L})\) were compared with respect to their effects on average dry weight (per 100 seven- day-old seedlings). The basic experiment was replicated four times for a total of 40 dryweight observations (four for each treatment level). The article reported an ANOVA \(F\) statistic value of \(1.895 .\) Using a significance level of \(.05\), test the null hypothesis that the true mean dry weight is the same for all 10 concentration levels.

    See all solutions

    Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

    View all explanations

    What do you think about this solution?

    We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

    Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.