/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 The article "A 'White' Name Foun... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "A 'White' Name Found to Help in Job Search" (Associated Press, January 15,2003 ) described an experiment to investigate if it helps to have a "whitesounding" first name when looking for a job. Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white- sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had 'black-sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. Resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and resumes of the second type only 167 responses. Do these data support the theory that the proportion receiving positive responses is higher for those resumes with "whitesounding first" names?

Short Answer

Expert verified
To conclude whether resumes with 'white-sounding' names receive more positive responses than those with 'black-sounding' names, one needs to calculate the test statistic using the given data, then find the corresponding P-value. If the P-value is less than the level of significance (usually 0.05), the evidence would support the theory that 'white-sounding' names receive more responses. The exact answer would require calculation of the test statistic and the P-value.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Hypotheses

The first step in conducting a hypothesis test is to formulate the null and alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the proportion of positive responses for resumes with 'white-sounding' first names is the same as the proportion for 'black-sounding' names. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that the proportion of positive responses is higher for resumes with 'white-sounding' names. Therefore: \(H_0: P_{white} = P_{black}\) and \(H_1: P_{white} > P_{black}\) where \(P_{white}\) is the proportion of positive responses for 'white-sounding' names and \(P_{black}\) is the proportion of positive responses for 'black-sounding' names.
02

Calculating Sample Proportions

Given the data in the exercise, the proportion of 'white-sounding' names that received positive responses is \(P_{white} = 250 / 2500 = 0.10\) and for 'black-sounding' names is \(P_{black} = 167 / 2500 = 0.0668\).
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for hypothesis testing for two population proportions is given by: \[Z = \frac {(P_{white} - P_{black}) - 0} {\sqrt {P(1-P) (1/n1 + 1/n2)}}\], where \(P = \frac {x1 + x2} {n1 + n2}\), \(n1\) and \(n2\) are the size of both groups, and \(x1\) and \(x2\) are the successes of both groups. In this case, \(n1 = n2 = 2500\), \(x1 = 250\), \(x2 = 167\). Therefore, \(P = \frac {250 + 167} {2500 + 2500} = 0.0834\), So, the Z value can be computed.
04

Find the P-value and Make Decision

The P-value is the probability that the test statistic is at least as extreme as the one calculated, given that the null hypothesis is true. Here, since the alternative is that \(P_{white} > P_{black}\), the P-value corresponds to the area to the right of the calculated test statistic on the standard normal curve. If the P-value is less than the level of significance (usually 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis serves as the starting point of our statistical inquiry. Simply put, it is the assumption that there is no effect or no difference in a given situation. For this exercise, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), suggests that there is no difference in the proportions of positive responses to job resumes with "white-sounding" first names versus those with "black-sounding" names.

This means under the null hypothesis, the proportions are equal: \(P_{white} = P_{black}\). What this conveys is the notion of "innocent until proven guilty", where no discrimination is assumed unless evidence clearly states otherwise. Establishing \(H_0\) is an essential step in hypothesis testing as it sets the benchmark against which the real-world data will be compared.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis is the opposite of the null hypothesis. It presents the statement that the researcher aims to provide evidence for. In our sample exercise, it's expressed as \(H_1\), asserting that the proportion of positive responses is higher for resumes with "white-sounding" first names.

The mathematical representation of this is given by \(P_{white} > P_{black}\). That equation implies a directional hypothesis where we're specifically testing if "white-sounding" names receive a more favorable response. Unlike the null hypothesis, which assumes no effect, \(H_1\) embodies the change or effect being investigated. This is crucial because if evidence strongly supports \(H_1\), it leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, offering new insights into the research question being studied.
Test Statistic
A test statistic is a standardized value that is calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. It helps in determining how far our sample statistics deviate from the null hypothesis. The formula used in this exercise is specific to comparing two proportions:
  • \[Z = \frac {(P_{white} - P_{black}) - 0} {\sqrt {P(1-P) (1/n_1 + 1/n_2)}}\]
Here, \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sizes of the groups (both 2500 resumes), and \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are the successes (responses received) for the "white-sounding" and "black-sounding" names respectively.

The pooled proportion \(P\) is computed as \(P = \frac {x_1 + x_2} {n_1 + n_2}\), representing the overall success rate of both groups together. The test statistic allows us to quantify the evidence against the null hypothesis. A higher test statistic value indicates a greater deviation from the hypothesized parameter, which can lead to rejecting the null hypothesis if it's 'extreme' enough given the study context.
P-value
The P-value is a crucial component in hypothesis testing, as it describes the probability of obtaining a test result at least as extreme as the observed data, assuming the null hypothesis is true. It quantifies the evidence against the null hypothesis.

In our example, the P-value corresponds to the area to the right of the calculated Z-value on the standard normal distribution curve, reflecting the probability that a sample as or more extreme than our current dataset occurs by random chance.

If the P-value is less than the significance level (commonly 0.05), it suggests the sample data is not consistent with the null hypothesis, leading to its rejection in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, a high P-value means there isn't enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the P-value aids researchers in making data-driven decisions regarding the validity of their hypotheses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that you were interested in investigating the effect of a drug that is to be used in the treatment of patients who have glaucoma in both eyes. A comparison between the mean reduction in eye pressure for this drug and for a standard treatment is desired. Both treatments are applied directly to the eye. a. Describe how you would go about collecting data for your investigation. b. Does your method result in paired data? c. Can you think of a reasonable method of collecting data that would result in independent samples? Would such an experiment be as informative as a paired experiment? Comment.

An Associated Press article (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 23,1995 ) examined the changing attitudes of Catholic priests. National surveys of priests aged 26 to 35 were conducted in 1985 and again in 1993\. The priests surveyed were asked whether they agreed with the following statement: Celibacy should be a matter of personal choice for priests. In \(1985,69 \%\) of those surveyed agreed; in \(1993,38 \%\) agreed. Suppose that the samples were randomly selected and that the sample sizes were both 200 . Is there evidence that the proportion of priests who agreed that celibacy should be a matter of personal choice declined from 1985 to 1993 ? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: \(1322-1326\) ) gave the following data on total body bone mineral content \((\mathrm{g})\) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during breast feeding by more than \(25 \mathrm{~g}\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). \(\begin{array}{lllllll}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \text { B } & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \text { P } & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\ \text { B } & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \text { P } & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

Do teachers find their work rewarding and satisfying? The article "Work- Related Attitudes" (Psychological Reports \([1991]: 443-450\) ) reported the results of a survey of random samples of 395 elementary school teachers and 266 high school teachers. Of the elementary school teachers, 224 said they were very satisfied with their jobs, whereas 126 of the high school teachers were very satisfied with their work. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion very satisfied is different for elementary school teachers than it is for high school teachers? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a \(.05\) significance level.

In a study of malpractice claims where a settlement had been reached, two random samples were selected: random sample of 515 closed malpractice claims that were found not to involve medical errors and a random sample 0 889 claims that were found to involve errors (New England Journal of Medicine [2006]: 2024-2033). The following statement appeared in the referenced paper: "When claims not involving errors were compensated, payments were sig. nificantly lower on average than were payments for claims involving errors \((\$ 313,205\) vs. \(\$ 521,560, P=0.004)\)." a. What hypotheses must the researchers have tested in order to reach the stated conclusion? b.__________

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.